The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 609-625

  Naveh Benjamin, Moshe ^a,b   Craik, Fergus I M ^c   Perretta, James G ^c   Tonev, Simon T ^c  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0034252048     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755914     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, N.D., Craik, F.I.M., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology and Aging, 13, 405-423.
2. Baddeley, A.D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 518-540.
3. Carrier, M.L., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
4. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1986). Memory for proper names: Age differences in retrieval. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 187-197.
5. Craik, F.I.M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In F. Klix, J. Hoffman, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 152-161). Berlin: FRG.
6. Craik, F.I.M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 302, 341-359.
7. Craik, F.I.M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N.D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
8. Craik, F.I.M., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N.D. (1998). Encoding and retrieval processes: Similarities and differences. In M.A. Conway, C. Cornoldi, & S.E. Gathercole (Eds.), Theories of memory II (pp. 61-86). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Dehn, D.M., & Engelkamp, J. (1997). Process dissociation procedure: Double dissociations following divided attention and speeded responding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 318-336.
10. Dodson, C.S., & Johnson, M.K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
11. Fernandes, M.A., & Moscovitch, M. (in press). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects both at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
12. Griffith, D. (1976). The attentional demands of mnemonic control processes. Memory and Cognition, 4, 103-108.
13. Johnston, W.A., Greenberg, S.N., Fisher, R.P., & Martin, D.W. (1970). Divided attention: A vehicle for monitoring memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 164-171.
14. Johnston, W.A., Griffith, D., & Wagstaff, R.R. (1972). Speed, accuracy, and ease of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 512-520.
15. Kellog, R.T., Cocklin, T., & Bourne, L.E. Jr. (1982). Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 183-198.
16. Kolers, P.A. (1973). Remembering operations. Memory and Cognition, 1, 347-355.
17. Mishkin, M., & Appenzeller, T. (1987). The anatomy of memory. Scientific American, 256, 80-89.
18. Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
19. Moscovitch, M. (1992). Memory and working-with-memory: A component process model based on modules and central systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 257-267.
20. Murdock, B.B., Jr. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 413-419.
21. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 595-605.
22. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity. Memory and Cognition, 16, 437-445.
23. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1990). Coding of temporal order information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 117-126.
24. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F.I.M., Guez, J., & Dori, H. (1998). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1091-1104.
25. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Guez, J. (1999). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Jonides, J. (1986). On the automaticity of frequency coding: Effects of competing task load, encoding strategy, and intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 378-386.
27. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L., & Schreiber, T.A. (1993). The University of Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript.
28. Shaw, R.J., & Craik, F.I.M. (1989). Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task. Psychology and Aging, 4, 131-135.
29. Squire, L.R. (1992). Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.