The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 259-278

  Gruppuso, Vincenza ^a   Lindsay, D Stephen ^a,c   Kelley, Colleen M ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b MACALESTER COLLEGE   (United States)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031535628     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.259     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abra, J. C. (1972). List differentiation and forgetting. In C. P. Duncan, L. Sechrest, & A. W. Melton (Eds.), Human memory: Festschrift for Benton J. Underwood (pp. 25-57). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
3. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
4. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
5. Chandler, C. (1994). Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test. Memory & Cognition, 22, 273-280.
6. Craik, F. I. M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In F. Klix, J. Hoffman, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 152-161). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
7. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 531-547.
8. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1997). Consequences and causes of correlation in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 496-504.
9. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
10. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
11. Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori-, post hoc-, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University.
12. Fisher, R. P., & Cuervo, A. (1983). Memory for physical features of discourse as a function of their relevance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 130-138.
13. Galbraith, R. C. (1975). On the independence of attributes of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 23-30.
14. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
15. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 19, 617-623.
16. Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114-122.
17. Gardiner, J. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 579-583.
18. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
19. Graf, P. (1995). Defining the opposition procedure: A reply to Toth, Reingold, and Jacoby's (1995) response to Graf and Komatsu (1994). European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 225-231.
20. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
21. Hayman, G. C. A., & Rickards, C. (1995). A dissociation in the effects of study modality on tests of implicit and explicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 23, 95-112.
22. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
23. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
24. Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled effects of study/test compatibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 35-52.
25. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defence of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 484-495.
26. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
27. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 505-510.
29. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
30. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Yonelinas, A. P., & Debner, J. A. (1994). The relationship between conscious and unconscious influences: Independence or redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 216-219.
31. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
32. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1996). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the question of consciousness (pp. 13-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
34. Johnson, M. K. (1983). A multiple-entry, modular memory system. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 81-123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Johnson, M. K. (1990). Functional forms of human memory. In J. L. McGaugh, N. M. Weinberger, & G. Lynch (Eds.), Brain organization and memory: Cells, systems and circuits (pp. 176-197). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Johnson, M. K. (1992). MEM: Mechanisms of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 268-280.
37. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
38. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
39. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
40. Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 157-175.
41. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1-24.
42. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1996). Conscious and unconscious forms of memory. In R. Bjork & E. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory (Vol. 10, pp. 31-63). New York: Academic Press.
43. Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425-449.
44. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
45. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-333.
46. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
47. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980, February 1). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
48. Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197-211.
49. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
50. Mandler, G. (1991). Your face looks familiar but I can't remember your name: A review of dual process theory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays in human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdoch (pp. 207-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. S. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure to stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648.
52. McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1994). Effects of imagery on perceptual implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1379-1390.
53. Mensink, G. J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455.
54. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851-864.
55. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
56. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
57. Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1993). The story of the two-store model of memory: Past criticisms, current status, and future directions. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 467-488). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 352-374.
59. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, R. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-451.
60. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations, and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 62-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
62. Roediger, H. L., III, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 355-389). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro-Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
64. Schwanz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1074-1083.
65. Srinivas, K., & Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 389-412.
66. Toth, J. P. (1995). Unintentional influences and opposition: A reply to Graf. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 233-237.
67. Toth, J. P., Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1992). Awareness, automaticity, and memory dissociations. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (2nd ed., pp. 46-57). New York: Guilford.
68. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). A response to Graf and Komatsu's (1994) critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 113-130.
69. Wagner, A. D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Verfaellie, M. (1997). Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit-recognition and implicit-perceptual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 305-323.
70. Watkins, M. J. (1990). Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist, 45, 328-335.
71. Webster's New World Dictionary of American English (3rd ed.). (1991). New York: Prentice Hall.
72. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-1253.
73. Witherspoon, D., & Moscovitch, M. (1989). Stochastic independence between two implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 22-30.
74. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996a). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.
75. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996b). Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.
76. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating-response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 821-835.