Investigating first-year chemistry learning difficulties in the South Pacific: A case study from Fiji

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 365-390

  Coll, Richard Kevin ^a   Ali, Sadaquat ^a   Bonato, John ^a   Rohindra, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Chemistry; Learning difficulties; South Pacific; Tertiary education

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750574804     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-005-9007-6     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Alsina, C. (2002). Too much is not enough: Teaching maths through useful applications with local and global perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(2), 239-250.
2. Banerjee, A.C. (1995). Teaching chemical equilibrium and thermodynamics in undergraduate general chemistry classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(10), 879-881.
3. Bar, V. (1990). The development of the concept of evaporation, Jerusalem: Hebrew University Press.
4. Bar, V. & Travis, A.S. (1991). Children's views concerning phase change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382.
5. Barrow, G.M. (1994). General chemistry and the basis for change. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(10), 874-878.
6. Ben-Zvi, R. & Hofstein, A. (1996). Strategies for reediting learning difficulties in chemistry. In D.F. Treagust, R. Duit & B.J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning (pp. 109-119). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Berlin, D.F. & White, A.L. (1998). Integrated science and mathematics education: Evolution and implications of a theoretical model. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 499-512). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Bliss, J. (1995). Piaget and after: The case of learning science. Studies in Science Education, 25, 139-172.
9. Bodner, G.M. (1991). I have found you an argument: The conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 385-388.
10. Boo, H.K. (1998). Students' understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 569-581.
11. BouJaoude, S.B. (1992). The relationship between students' learning strategies and the change in their understanding during a high school chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 687-699.
12. Brahier, D.J. (2001). Understanding mathematcis and basic skills. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(1), 8-9.
13. Buntting, C., Coll, R.K. & Campbell, A. (in press). Student views of concept mapping use in introductory tertiary biology classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
14. Carlson, C. (2000). Scientific literacy for all. Science Teacher, 67(3), 48-52.
15. Carmichael, P., Driver, R., Holding, B., Phillips, I., Twigger, D. & Watts, M. (1990). Research on students ' conceptions in science: A bibliography. Children's learning in science project. Leeds, England: University of Leeds.
16. Chapman, A. & Pyvis, D. (2000). Literacy and numeracy needs and priorities: A case study of regional TAPE courses in Western Australia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rural Communities & Identities in the Global Millennium. Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
17. Cobern, W.W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Coll, R.K. & Treagust, D.F. (2002). Learners' use of analogy and alterative conceptions for chemical bonding: A cross-age study. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 48(1), 24-32.
19. Coll, R.K. & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Learners' mental models of metallic bonding: A cross-age study. Science Education, 87, 685-707.
20. Coll, R.K., Taylor, N. & Fisher, D.L. (2002). An application of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction and College and University Classroom Environment Inventory in a multicultural tertiary context. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 165-183.
21. Dalgety, J., Coll, R.K. & Jones, A. (2003). The development of the Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649-668.
22. Driver, R. (1981). Pupil's alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93-101.
23. Driver, R. (1989a). Changing conceptions. In P. Adley (Ed.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 79-99). London: Falmer.
24. Driver, R. (1989b). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481-490.
25. Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
26. Driver, R. & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
27. Europa World Yearbook. (1994). London: Europa Publications.
28. Fensham, P.J. (1992). Science education at first degree level. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 505-514.
29. Gerber, B.L., Cavallo, A.M.L. & Marek, E.A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549.
30. Gifford, R. (1997). The role of language in primary science. Primary Science Review, 48, 14-17.
31. Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C.J. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53-66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
32. Gilbert, J.K. & Watts, D.M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98.
33. Good, R.G., Wandersee, J.H. & St. Julien, J. (1993). Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new 'ism' (constructivism) in science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 71-87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Grayson, D.J., Anderson, T.R. & Crossley, L.G. (2001). A four-level framework for identifying and classifying student conceptual and reasoning difficulties. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 611-622.
35. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E. & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822.
36. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Hogan, K. & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687.
39. Horton, P.B. (1992). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111.
40. Johnstone, A.H. & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited. Chemical Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(1), 19-29.
41. Kogut, L.S. (1996). Critical thinking in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 218-221.
42. Laugksch, R.C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
43. Laws, P.M. (1996). Undergraduate science education: A review of research. Studies in Science Education, 28, 1-85.
44. Lawson, A.E. (1992). Using reasoning ability as the basis for assigning laboratory partners in nonmajors biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 729-741.
45. Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 265-294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
46. Lorenzo, M. (2005). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a problem solving heuristic, international Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 33-58.
47. Matthews, B. (2003). Public policy in mathematics education: A hidden agenda. Education Canada, 43(2), 13-15.
48. Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49. Metz, K.E. (1998). Scientific inquiry within reach of young children. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 81-96). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
50. Miller, K.W. & Davison, D.M. (2001). A cultural and linguistic approach to teaching science and mathematics to Native American students. Science Educator, 10(1), 38-42.
51. Mugler, F. & Landbeck, R. (2000). Learning, memorisation and understanding among distance learners in the South Pacific. Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 179-202.
52. Mulligan, D. & Kirkpatrick, A. (2000). How much do they understand? Lectures, students and comprehension. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 311-336.
53. Muralidhar, S. (1989). An exploratory study of a science curriculum in action: Basic Science in Fiji. Unpublished PhD thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
54. Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
55. Nussbaum, J. & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11(3), 183-200.
56. Osborne, R. & Cosgrove, M.R. (1983). Children's conceptions of the of changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838.
57. Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (Eds.). (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
58. Paulston, C.B. (1988). Bilingualism and bilingual education. In C.B. Paulston (Ed.), International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education (pp. 1-15). New York: Greenwood.
59. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education, 3rd edn. Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
60. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1997). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education, 4th edn. Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
61. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education, 5th edn. Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
62. Pitkethly, A. & Presser, M. (2000). The first year experience project: A model for university-wide change. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(2), 185-199.
63. Pittman, K.M. (1999). Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 1-22.
64. Prophet, B. & Twose, P. (1999). Pupils' understanding of some non-technical words in science. School Science Review, 81(295), 79-86.
65. Roth, W.-M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). Using vee and concept maps in collaborative settings: Elementary education majors construct leaning in physical science courses. School Science and Mathematics, 93(5), 237-244.
66. Sade, D. & Coll, R.K. (2003). Technology and technology education: Views of some Solomon Island primary teachers and curriculum development officers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 87-114.
67. Scott, P.H., Asoko, H.M. & Driver, R.H. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an International Workshop. University of Bremen, Kiel: Institute for Science Education.
68. Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 49-59.
69. Solomon, J. (1995). Higher level understanding of the nature of science. School Science Review, 76(276), 15-22.
70. Sutherland, D., Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 1-25.
71. Taber, K.S. & Coll, R.K. (2002). Bonding. In J.K., Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D.F. Treagust & J.H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 213-234). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
72. Tavola, H. (1992). Race is not the only issue in education in Fiji. Directions: Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 34-40.
73. Taylor, N.T. (1991). The Fiji junior certificate basic science examination: Its implications for the teaching of science in Fiji. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 14(2), 73-78.
74. Taylor, N. (1993). Teaching science at the University of the South Pacific: Its special problems. Journal of Indian Education, 18(5), 18-23.
75. Taylor, N.T. & Coll, R.K. (1999). The science learning environment: Some views from Fiji pre-service primary school teachers. Pacific-Asian Education, 11(2), 47-58.
76. Taylor, N. & Lucas, K. (1997). The trial of an innovative science program for pre-service primary teachers in Fiji. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(3), 325-343.
77. Tobin, K. & Roth, M.W. (1996). Staging Aristotle and natural observation against Galileo and (stacked) scientific experiment or physics lectures as rhetorical events. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 135-157.
78. Tobin, K. & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism: A paradigm for the practice of science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum.
79. Tomlin, A. (2002). Literacy approaches in the numeracy classroom. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 1(2), 9-24.
80. Treagust, D.F. (1995). Diagnostic assessment of students' science knowledge. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 327-346). Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Treagust, D.F., Chittleborough, G. & Mamiala, T.L. (2002). Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-368.
82. Trochim, W.M.K. (2001). The research methods knowledge base, 2nd edn. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
83. Viiri, J. (1996). Teaching the force concept: A constructivist teaching experiment in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 55-63.
84. Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning in knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 413-437). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
85. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
86. Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
87. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Translated by A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Ward, R.E. & Wandersee, J.H. (2002). Struggling to understand abstract science topics: A roundhouse diagram-based study. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 575-591.
89. Wheatley, G.H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21.
90. Wilson, V.L., Ackerman, C. & Malave, C. (2000). Cross-time attitudes, concept formation and achievement in college freshman physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1112-1120.
91. World Bank. (1996). Pacific island economies: Building a resilient economic base for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: World Bank.
92. Zack, V. (1999). Everyday and mathematical language in children's argumentation about proof. Educational Review, 51(2), 129-146.
93. Zohar, A. & Tamir, P. (1991). Assessing students' difficulties in causal reasoning biology - a diagnostic instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 25(4), 302-307.
94. Zoller, U. (1990). Students' misunderstandings and misconceptions in college freshman chemistry (general and organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1053-1065.