Staging Aristotle and Natural Observation against Galileo and (Stacked) Scientific Experiment or Physics Lectures as Rhetorical Events

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 135-157

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a   Tobin, Kenneth ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Dept of Curriculum and Instruction ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542396212     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199602)33:2<135::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amann, K., & Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1988). The fixation of (visual) evidence. Human Studies, 11, 133-169.
2. Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas.
4. Barrow, D. (1993). Restructuring college level physics for prospective elementary school teachers: A sociocultural analysis of the roles the instructor plays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
5. Bastide, F. (1990). The iconography of scientific texts: principles of analysis. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 187-229). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Brush, S. (1993). A case study of learning chemistry in a college physical science course developed for prospective elementary teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
7. Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66-71.
8. Drake, S. (1978). Galileo at work: His scientific biography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Drake, S. (1990). Galileo: Pioneer scientist. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
10. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1991). Cardboard computers: Mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 169-195). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
11. Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., & de Jong, T. (1993). Does physics instruction foster university students' cognitive processes? A descriptive study of teacher activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 681-696.
12. Galileo, G. (1960/1590). On motion and on mechanics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
14. Gooding, D. (1990). Mapping experiment as learning process: How the first electromagnetic motor was invented. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 165-201.
15. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 65-112). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Gregory, B. (1990). Inventing reality: Physics as language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Cuba, E., & Lincoln, Y.S (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D. (1987). Modelling instruction in mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 55, 444-454.
19. Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55, 455-462.
20. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-103.
21. Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1992). The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: On the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 113-138). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Kuhn, T.S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
24. Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K.D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 141-170). London: Sage Publications.
25. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
26. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Lemke, J.L. (in press). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Martin (ed.), Scientific discourse. New York: Longmans.
30. Lühl, J. (1992). Teaching of social and philosophical background to atomic theory. Science & Education, 1, 193-204.
31. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32. Lynch, M. (1990). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 153-186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Roschelle, J. (1994). Designing for cognitive communication: Epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry? The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture [On-line serial], 2. [anonymous ftp byrd.mu.wvnet.edu]
36. Roth, W.-M. (1993). Problem-centered learning or the integration of mathematics and science in a constructivist laboratory: A case study. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 113-122.
37. Roth, W.-M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197-223.
38. ™. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 329-347.
39. Roth, W.-M. (in press-a). Knowledge diffusion* in a Grade 4/5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices. Cognition and Instruction.
40. Roth, W.-M. (in press-b). The co-evolution of situated language and physics knowing. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
41. Roth, W.-M. (in press-c). Where is the context in contextual word problems? Mathematical practices and products in Grade 8 students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction.
42. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G.M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a Grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 73-128.
43. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: New perspectives for the science teacher. International Journal for Science Education, 16, 437-455.
44. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Shaw, K. (1995). Integration or separation of mathematics and science? Problems in establishing the isomorphism of fundamental structure and mathematical form. Manuscript submitted for publication.
45. Schecker, H.P. (1992). The paradigmatic change in mechanics: Implications of historical processes for physics education. Science & Education, 1, 71-76.
46. Suzuki, D. (1989). Inventing the future: Reflections on science, technology, and nature. Toronto: Stoddart.
47. Tobin, K., Roth, W.-M., & Brush, S. (1995). Teaching physics to prospective elementary teachers: Bridging gaps or widening chasms? Research in Science Education, 25.
48. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Philosophical remarks. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50. Woolgar, S. (Ed.). (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage Publications.
51. Woolgar, S. (1990). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 123-152), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Ueno, N. (1993). Reconsidering p-prims theory from the viewpoint of situated cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 239-248.