Technology and technology education: Views of some solomon island primary teachers and curriculum development officers

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 87-114

  Sade, David ^a   Coll, Richard K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Primary science teachers; Solomon Islands; Technology; Technology education

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844367469     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026155003835     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. (Translated by M. Holquist and C. Emerson.) Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Burns, J. (1992). Student perceptions and implications for an empowering curriculum. Research in Science Education, 22, 72-80.
3. Bybee, R. (2000). Achieving technology literacy: A national imperative. A presentation for a government industry dialogue. Washington, DC: The Technological Literacy and Workforce Imperative.
4. Cajas, F. & Gallagher, J.J. (2001). Preface: The interdependence of scientific and technological literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 713-714.
5. Claxton, G. & Carr, M.D. (1991). Understanding change: The personal perspective. In B. Bell (Ed.), SAME papers (pp. 1-14). Hamilton, New Zealand: Longman Paul.
6. Curriculum Development Centre (1983). Policy Documents relating to Solomon Islands education; Education policy 1975-1979. Honiara, Solomon Islands: Curriculum Development Centre.
7. Dyrenfurth, M.J. (1984). Literacy for technological world. Information Series No. 266. Columbus, OH: The National Centre for Vocational Education.
8. France, B. & Davies, J. (2001). Asking the 'right' questions: Identifying issues in developing a technological solution. Research in Science and Technology Education, 31, 137-153.
9. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers' College Press.
10. Gardner, P. (1994). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical relations. Part 1. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(2), 123-153.
11. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.
14. Hennessy, S. & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9, 1-36.
15. Hill, A.M. & Anning, A. (2001). Primary teachers' and students' understanding of school situated design in Canada and England. Research in Science and Technology Education, 31(1), 117-135.
16. Honan, M. & Harcombe, D. (1997). Solomon Islands. Victoria, Australia: Lonely Planet.
17. International Technology Education Association and Technology for All Americans. (2000). Standard for technological literacy. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
18. Jarvis, T. & Rennie, L. (1996). Perceptions about technology held by primary teachers in England. Research in Science and Technology Education, 14, 43-54.
19. Jenkins, E. (1994). The Relationship between science and technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Educational Forum.
20. Jones, A. (1997). Recent research in learning technological concepts and processes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), 83-96.
21. Jones, A. (2001). Theme issue: Developing research in technology education, Research in Science Education, 31, 3-14.
22. Jones, A. (in press). The role and place of technology in science education. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: Contemporary issues in practice. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Association for the Education of Teachers of Science.
23. Jones, A. & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of technology education: Implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22, 230-239.
24. Jones, A. & Carr, M. (1993a). Analysis of student capability. Vol. 2: Working Papers of the Learning in Technology Project. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science & Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
25. Jones, A. & Carr, M. (1993b). Towards technology education. Vol. 1: Working Papers of the Learning in Technology Project. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science & Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
26. Jones, A., Mather, V. & Carr, M. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education: Volume 3: Working Papers of Learning in Technology Education Project. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science & Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
27. Kii, L. (1994). Issues and problems pertinent to our education system. Paper presented at an education summit organised by the Ministry of Education and Training. Honiara, Solomon Islands.
28. Kudu, D. (2001). Population trends and their impacts on human resource development and planning. A paper presented at the leaders seminar. Ministry of National Planning and Human Resources Development. Downloaded February 2002 from: hpp://www.peoplesfirst.net.sb/General/Population%20Seminer.htm.
29. Layton, D. (1991). Science education and praxis: The relationship of school science to practical action. Studies in Science Education, 19, 43-49.
30. Leggett, M. & Robertson, S. (1996). Curriculum fragmentation impedes students understanding of technology and the environment. Education Policy, 11, 681-691.
31. McCormick, R. (1992). The evolution of current practice in technology education. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and learning technology (pp. 3-14). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
32. McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Hennessey, S. (1994). Problem solving processes in technology education: A pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(1), 5-34.
33. McRobbie, C.J. & Tobin, K. (1995). Restraints to reform: The congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 373-385.
34. Moreland, J., Jones, A. & Northover, A. (2001). Enhancing teachers' technological knowledge and assessment practices to enhance student learning in technology: A two-year classroom study. Research in Science and Technology Education, 31, 155-176.
35. Ministry of Education (1995). Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
36. Pacey, A. (1993). The culture of technology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
37. Paechter, C. (1992). Subject subcultures and tie negotiation of open work: Conflict ind co-operation in cross-curricular coursework. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and learning technology (pp. 279-288). Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley, Open University Press.
38. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury, CA: Sage.
39. Perkins, D. & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 16-25.
40. Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the Journal of Technology Education Volumes 1-8. Journal of Technology Education, 10, 27-57.
41. Rennie, L.J. (1987). Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of technology and the implication for curriculum. Research in Science and Technology Education, 5, 121-133.
42. Rennie, L.J. (2001). Teacher collaboration in curriculum change: The implementation of technology education in the primary school. Research in Science and Technology Education, 31(1), 49-69.
43. Rennie, L.J. & Jarvis, T. (1995). Three approaches to measuring children's perceptions about technology. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 755-774.
44. Stables, K. & Kimbell, R. (2001). Technology education in South Africa: Evaluating an innovative pilot project. Research in Science and Technology Education, 31, 71-90.
45. Symington, D.J. (1987). Technology in the primary school curriculum: Teachers' ideas. Research in Science and Technological Education, 5, 167-172.
46. Vries, M. de (2001). The history of industrial research laboratories as a resource for teaching about science-technology relationships. Research in Science and Technology Education, 31, 15-28.
47. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. (Translated by A. Kozulin.) Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
48. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasly (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49. World Bank. (1996). Pacific island economies: Building a resilient economic base for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: World Bank.