Academic publishing: Best practice for editors, guest editors, authors and reviewers

European Business Review

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 468-478

  Gilmore, Audrey ^a   Carson, David ^a   Perry, Chad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Best practice; Publishing; Research; Serials

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750259614     PISSN: 0955534X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09555340610711094     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Armstrong, J.S. (1997), "Peer review for journals: evidence on quality control, fairness and innovation", Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 3, pp. 63-84, available at: www-marketing,wharton.upenn.edu/people/faculty/ armstrong2.htm.
2. Carson, D. and Gilmore, A. (1998), "Editorial", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 32 Nos 3/4, pp. 180-3, see also the editorials in issues1/2, 5/6, 11/12, Vol. 32.
3. Day, A. (1996), How to Get Research Published in Journals, Gower, Aldershot.
4. Huff, A.S. (1999), Writing for Scholarly Publication, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
5. Perry, C., Carson, D. and Gilmore, A. (2003), "Joining a conversation: how to get published", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37 Nos 5/6, pp. 652-67, Commentary.
6. Stewart, D.W. (2002), "Getting published: reflections of an old editor", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66 No. 4, pp. 405-15.
7. Anonymous (2002), "The peer review process", Literati Club, Emerald, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/literaticlub/authors/articles10. htm.
8. Armstrong, J.S. (1980), "Unintelligible management research and academic prestige", Interfaces, Vol. 10, pp. 80-6.
9. Armstrong, J.S. (1982), "Research in scientific journals: implications for editors and authors", Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 83-104.
10. Brown, R. (1996), "Key skills for publishing research articles", WriteWay Consulting, Sunnybank, Kardinia St.
11. Brown, R.F., Rogers, D.J. and Pressland, A.J. (1994), "Create a clear focus: the 'big picture' about writing better research articles", American Entomologist, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 144-5.
12. Chandy, R.K. (2003), "Research as innovation: rewards, perils, and guideposts for research and reviews in marketing", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 351-5.
13. Chandy, R.K., Homburg, C., MacInnis, D., MacKenzie, S.B., Nakata, C., Ostrom, A.L., Parasuraman, A., Singh, J., Smith, D.C., Taylor, S., Voss, G.B. and Woodruff, R.B. (2003), "Reflections on research in marketing and reviewing for scholarly journals invited essays by JAMS 2000-2003 outstanding reviewer award recipients: introduction to special section", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 312-3.
14. Fiske, D.W. and Fogg, L. (1990), "But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper Diversity and uniqueness in reviewers' comments", American Psychologist, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 591-8.
15. Gottlieb, N. and Brown, R. (1994), "Supervising the writing process in the humanities and social sciences", in Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.), Second Manual for Conducting Workshops on Postgraduate Supervision, The Tertiary Education Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
16. Griseri, P. (2002), Management Knowledge: A Critical View, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
17. Heath, T. (1992), "Writing up research in the sciences", in Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.), Manual for Conducting Workshops on Postgraduate Supervision, The Tertiary Education Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
18. Homburg, C. (2003), "Publishing processes in the academic marketing discipline in the United States: a German perspective", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 348-50.
19. Hult, G., Tomas, M., Neese, W.T. and Bashaw, R.E. (1997), "Faculty perceptions of marketing journals", Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 37-52.
20. Joint NHRMV/AVCC Statement and Guidelines on Research Practice (1987), available at: www.avcc.edu.au/about%5Favcc/committees/research/glrespra.htm.
21. Leedy, P. (1989), Practical Research, Macmillan, New York, NY.
22. Lindsay, D. (1995), A Guide to Scientific Writing, Longman, Melbourne.
23. MacInnis, D. (2003), "Responsibilities of a good reviewer: lessons learned from Kindergarten", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 344-5.
24. MacKenzie, S.B. (2003), "The dangers of poor construct conceptualization", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 323-6.
25. Nakata, C. (2003), "A philosophy of reviewing: taking cues from Henry James", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 346-7.
26. Nightingale, P. (1992), "Writing about research in the humanities and social sciences", in Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.), Manual for Conducting Workshops on Postgraduate Supervision, The Tertiary Education Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
27. Ostrom, A.L. (2003), "Achieving 'reviewer readiness'", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 337-40.
28. Parasuraman, A. (2003), "Reflections on contributing to a discipline through research and writing", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 314-8.
29. Perry, C. (1997), "How can I write a journal article in two days? A book review of Day, A. (1997), 'How to get research published in journals'", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 Nos 11/12, pp. 896-901.
30. Perry, C. (1998), "A structured approach for presenting theses", Australasian Marketing Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 63-85, an updated 2002 version is at the action resources, available at: www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/art/cperry.pdf.
31. Peters, D.P. and Ceci, S.J. (1982), "Peer review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again, and its open peer commentary", The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, pp. 187-255.
32. Phillips, E.M. and Pugh, D.S. (1987), How to Get a PhD, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
33. Polonsky, M., Lawson, R., Uncles, M., Johnson, L.W., Wilkinson, I. and Alpert, F. (1998), "Perspectives on academic publishing; advice for those just starting", Australasian Marketing Journal, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 63-80.
34. Saunders, J. and Hirst, A. (2000), "And you thought it was bad: the editorial process of journals", AM 2000 Proceedings, Academy of Marketing Conference, 5-7 July, University of Derby, Nottingham.
35. Singh, J. (2003), "A reviewer's gold", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 331-6.
36. Smith, D.C. (2003), "The importance and challenges of being interesting", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 319-22.
37. Summers, J.O. (2002), "Guidelines for conducting research and publishing in marketing: from conceptualisation through the review process", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 405-15.
38. Sutton, R.I. and Rafaeli, A. (1992), "Journey 4. How we untangled the relationship between displayed emotion and organisational ales: a tale of bickering and optimism", in Frost, P. and Stablein, R. (Eds), Doing Exemplary Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
39. Swales, J. (1984), "Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing", in Williams, R. and Swales, J. (Eds), Common Ground: Shared Interests in ESP and Communication Studies, Pergamon, Oxford.
40. Taylor, S. (2003), "Big R (versus little R) reviewers: the anonymous coauthor", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 341-3.
41. Theoharakis, V. and Hirst, A. (2002), "Perceptual differences of marketing journals: a worldwide perspective", Marketing Letters, Vol. 13 No. 4.
42. Vadrajan, P.R. (1996), "From the editor: reflections on research and publishing", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, p. 306.
43. Voss, G.B. (2003), "Formulating interesting research questions", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science., Vol. 31, pp. 356-9.
44. Woodruff, R.B. (2003), "Serving the marketing discipline through journal reviews", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 327-30.
45. Zinkhan, G.M. (2003), "A look to the future of JAMS: three years out, thirty years out", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, pp. 225-8.