The nature of anterior negativities caused by misapplications of morphological rules

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1616-1630

  Krott, Andrea ^a   Baayen, R Harald ^b,c,d   Hagoort, Peter ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HAIRDRESSER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 33749442343     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1616     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., & Boland, J. E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112-130.
2. Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. Analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90, 119-161.
3. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
4. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route modes. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
5. Baayen, R. H., & Martin, F. M. D. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81, 666-698.
6. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gullikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Krott, A. (2002). Dutch inflection: The rules that prove the exception. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 61-92). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
8. Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. NeuroReport, 15, 545-548.
9. Bartke, S., Rösler, F., Streb, J., & Wiese, R. (2005). An ERP-study of German "irregular" morphology. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 29-55.
10. Bentin, S. (1987). Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain and Language, 31, 308-327.
11. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
12. Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyona, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13-B25.
13. Bird, H., Ralph, M. A. L., Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2003). Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 502-526.
14. Braber, N., Patterson, K., Ellis, K., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2005). The relationship between phonological and morphological deficits in Broca's aphasia: Further evidence from errors in verb inflection. Brain and Language, 92, 278-287.
15. Bybee, J. L., & Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251-270.
16. Bybee, J. L., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265-289.
17. Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
18. De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81, 555-567.
19. Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60-74.
20. Dressler, W. U. (1999). Why collapse morphological concepts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1021.
21. Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time-course of syntactic activation during language processing - A model-based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259-281.
22. Friederici, A. D., Gunter, T. C., Hahne, A., & Mauth, K. (2004). The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport, 15, 165-169.
23. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
24. Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing - Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192.
25. Gross, M., Say, T., Kleingers, M., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1998). Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters, 241, 83-86.
26. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
27. Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. A. (2003). Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 38-50.
28. Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. C. (2000). German inflection: Single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology, 41, 313-360.
29. Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing - An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 35, 66-85.
30. Indefrey, P. (1999). Some problems with the lexical status of nondefault inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1025.
31. Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 96, 7592-7597.
32. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993a). Bridging the gap - Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
33. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993b). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 573-633.
34. Krott, A., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39, 51-93.
35. Krott, A., Hagoort, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 453-471.
36. Krott, A., Krebbers, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). Semantic influence on linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. Folia Linguistica, 36, 7-22.
37. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2002a). Analogical hierarchy: Examplar-based modeling of linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. In R. Skousen, D. Londsdale, & D. B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling: An examplar-based approach to language (pp. 181-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2002b). Linking elements in Dutch noun-noun compounds: Constituent families as analogical predictors for response latencies. Brain and Language, 81, 723-735.
39. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences - Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
40. Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. K. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83-143). San Diego: Academic Press.
41. Köpcke, K. M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25, 293-319.
42. Köster, D., Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1647-1668.
43. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50-64.
44. Marcus, G. F., Brinkman, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
45. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 428-435.
46. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2003). Capturing underlying differentiation in the human language system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 62-63.
47. Mattens, W. H. M. (1984). De voorspelbaarheid van tussenklanken in nominale samenstellingen [The predictability of linking phonemes in nominal compounds]. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 7, 333-343.
48. Miozzo, M. (2003). On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition, 87, 101-127.
49. Münte, T. F., & Heinze, H. J. (1994). ERP negativities during syntactic processing of written words. In H. J. Heinze, T. F. Münte, & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), Cognitive electrophysiology. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
50. Münte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., & Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335-344.
51. Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes - Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
52. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Segui, J., Ferrand, L., & Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 568-585.
53. Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Language-related ERPs - Scalp distributions and modulation by word type and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 233-255.
54. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
55. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
56. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 171-215). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences - Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786-803.
58. Palolahti, M., Leino, S., Jokela, M., Kopra, K., & Paavilainen, P. (2005). Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension. Neuroscience Letters, 384, 222-227.
59. Patterson, K., Ralph, M. A. L., Hodges, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 39, 709-724.
60. Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T. F., & Clahsen, H. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inf lections. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 37-52.
61. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
62. Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456-463.
63. Pothos, E. M. (2005). The rules versus similarity distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 1-14.
64. Ralph, M. A. L., Braber, N., McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2005). What underlies the neuropsychological pattern of irregular > regular past-tense verb production? Brain and Language, 93, 106-119.
65. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleo, C., Zaake, W., & Münte, T. F. (2001). Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 47-58.
66. Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). When word category information encounters morphosyntax: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 384, 228-233.
67. Rugg, M. D. (1987). Dissociation of semantic priming, word and non-word repetition effects by event-related potentials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Series A, Human Experimental Psychology, 39, 123-148.
68. Rugg, M. D., & Nagy, M. E. (1987). Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects - Evidence from event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 15, 473-481.
69. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 216-271). Cambridge: MIT Press.
70. Rösler, F., Putz, P., Friederici, A., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345-362.
71. Schreuder, R., de Jong, N., Krott, A., & Baayen, R. H. (1999). Rules and rote: Beyond the linguistic either-or fallacy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1038-1039.
72. Schreuder, R., Neijt, A., van der Weide, F., & Baayen, R. H. (1998). Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: Linking graphemes or morphemes? Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 551-573.
73. Seidenberg, M. S., & Joanisse, M. F. (2003). Show us the model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 106-107.
74. Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory & Cognition, 25, 425-437.
75. Tyler, L. K., Randall, B., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Phonology and neuropsychology of the English past tense. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1154-1166.
76. Ullman, M. T. (1999). Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 47-67.
77. Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 717-726.
78. Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231-270.
79. Ullman, M. T., Bergida, R., & O'Craven, K. M. (1997). Distinct fMRI activation patterns for regular and irregular past tense. Neuroimage, 5, S549.
80. van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwisterlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701-718.
81. van den Toorn, M. C. (1982a). Tendenzen bij de beregeling van de verbindingsklank in nominale samenstellingen i [Tendencies for the regulation of linking phonemes in nominal compounds i]. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 75, 24-33.
82. van den Toorn, M. C. (1982b). Tendenzen bij de beregeling van de verbindingsklank in nominale samenstellingen ii [tendencies for the regulation of linking phonemes in nominal compounds]. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 75, 153-160.
83. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word-frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393.
84. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41-63.
85. Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8, 957-962.