German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route?

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 313-360

  Hahn, Ulrike ^a,c   Nakisa, Ramin Charles ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d NCR Financial Systems Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS;

EID: 0034567171     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0737     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. Petrov & F. Csáki (Eds.), 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
2. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
3. Augst, G. (1979). Neuere Forschung zur Substantivflexion. Zeitscrift fuer germanistische Linguistik, 7, 220-232.
4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Bullinaria, J. (1997). Modelling, reading, spelling and past tense learning with artificial neural networks. Brain and Language, 59, 236-266.
6. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
7. Bybee, J., & Moder, C. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251-270.
8. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of german inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1010.
10. Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3-71.
11. Hahn, U., & Chater, N. (1998). Rules and similarity: Distinct? Exhaustive? Empirically distinguishable? Cognition, 65, 197-230.
12. Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. (in preparation). On the notion of "regular" or "default."
13. Hahn, U., Nakisa, R., Bailey, T., Holmes, M., Kemp, D., & Palmer, L. (1998). Experimental evidence against the dual-route account of inflectional morphology: Frequency and similarity. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 472-477). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Hahn, U., Nakisa, R., & Plunkett, K. (1997). The dual-route model of the english past-tense: Another case where defaults don't help. In Proceedings of the GALA '97 Conference on Language Acquisition. Human Communications Research Centre: The University of Edinburgh.
15. Kim, J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15, 173-218.
16. Köpcke, K. (1988). Schemas in german plural formation. Lingua, 74, 303-335.
17. Köpcke, K. (1993). Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
18. Lee, B. (1996). On the processing of regular and irregular inflections: The symbolist-connectionist debate revisited. In C. Koster & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Groningen Assembly on Language Acquisition.
19. MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40, 121-157.
20. Marcus, G. (1998). Can connectionism save constructivism? Cognition, 66, 153-182.
21. Marcus, G., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., Woest, A., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
22. Mugdan, J. (1977). Flexionsmorphologie und Psycholinguistik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
23. Nakisa, R. C., Plunkett, K., & Hahn, U. (2000). A cross-linguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. In P. Broeder & J. Murre, (Eds.), Cognitive models of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Nakisa, R., & Hahn, U. (1996). Where defaults don't help: The case of the german plural system. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Nosofsky, R. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
26. Nosofsky, R. (1988a). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 700-708.
27. Nosofsky, R. (1988b). Similarity, frequency and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 54-65.
28. Nosofsky, R., Clark, S., & Shin, H. (1989). Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 282-304.
29. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-535.
30. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193.
31. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43-102.
32. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building. Cognition, 48, 21-69.
33. Plunkett, K., & Nakisa, R. (1997). A connectionist model of the arabic plural system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 807-836.
34. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56.
35. Quinlan, R. (1992). C4.5 software: Programs for machine learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
36. Rueckl, J., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
37. Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning past tenses of english verbs. In J. McClelland & D. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Russ, C. (1989). Die pluralbildung im deutschen. Zeitschrift für germanische Linguistik, 17, 58-67.
39. Seidenberg, M., & Bruck, M. (1990). Consistency effects in the generation of past tense morphology. Paper presented at the 31st Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
40. Sereno, J., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of english inflectional morphology. Memory & Cognition, 25, 425-437.
41. Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-74.
42. Stanners, R., Neiser, J., Hernon, W., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
43. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the wordfrequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272.
44. Wurzel, W. (1981). Grundzuege einer deutschen Grammatik chapter: Phonologie: Segmentale Struktur (pp. 898-990). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.