Effect of example weights on prediction of protein-protein interactions

Computational Biology and Chemistry

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 386-392

  Li, Ming Hui ^a   Wang, Xiao Long ^a   Lin, Lei ^a   Liu, Tao ^a  

^a Bioinformatics Research Group   (China)

Author keywords

Attraction repulsion (AR) weight model; Example weighting; Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE); Protein protein interaction; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ATTRACTION-REPULSION (AR) WEIGHT MODELS; EXAMPLE WEIGHTING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MICROORGANISMS;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33748791172     PISSN: 14769271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2006.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Apweiler R., et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 37-40
2. Bader G.D., et al. BIND-the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 242-245
3. Bairoch A., et al. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) D154-D159
4. Ben-Hur A., and Noble W.S. Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics. 7 (2006) S2
5. Ben-Hur A., and Noble W.S. Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) i38-i46
6. Bock J.R., and Gough D.A. Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 455-460
7. Chen X.-W., and Liu M. Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 4394-4400
8. Dandekar T., et al. Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23 (1998) 324-328
9. Deng M., et al. Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12 (2002) 1540-1548
10. Enright A.J., et al. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 402 (1999) 86-90
11. Goh C.-S., et al. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299 (2000) 283-293
12. Gomez S.M., et al. Learning to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1875-1881
13. Gribskov M., and Robinson N.L. Use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Comput. Chem. 20 (1996) 25-33
14. Hanley J.A., and McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143 (1982) 29-36
15. Jansen R., et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302 (2003) 449-453
16. Lo S.L., et al. Effect of training datasets on support vector machine prediction of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics 5 (2005) 876-884
17. Marcotte E.M., et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285 (1999) 751-753
18. Marcotte E.M., et al. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402 (1999) 83-86
19. Martin S., et al. Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 218-226
20. Mewes H.W., et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) D41-D44
21. Overbeek R., et al. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96 (1999) 2896-2901
22. Pazos F., and Valencia A. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 14 (2001) 609-614
23. Pazos F., and Valencia A. In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins 47 (2002) 219-227
24. Pellegrini M., et al. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96 (1999) 4285-4288
25. Qi Y., et al. Random forest similarity for protein-protein interaction prediction from multiple sources. Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) (2005) 531-542
26. Ramani A.K., and Marcotte E.M. Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 327 (2003) 273-284
27. Sprinzak E., and Margalit H. Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 311 (2001) 681-692
28. von Mering C., et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417 (2002) 399-403
29. Xenarios I., et al. DIP, the database of interacting proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) 303-305