How do we compare hundreds of bacterial genomes?

Current Opinion in Microbiology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 499-504

  Field, Dawn ^a   Wilson, Gareth ^a   van der Gast, Christopher ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL GENOME; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER MODEL; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE;

BACTERIA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DATABASES, GENETIC; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 33748696962     PISSN: 13695274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.08.008     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Field D., Feil E., and Wilson G. Databases and software for the comparisons of prokaryotic genomes. Microbiology 151 (2005) 2125-2132
2. Binnewies T.T., Motro Y., Hallin P.F., Lund O., David Dunn D., La T., Hampson D.J., Bellgard M., Wassenaar T.M., and Ussery D.W. Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: 10 comparative-genomics-based discoveries. Funct Integr Genomics 6 (2006) 165-185. A rich overview of the outcomes of comparative genomic studies over the past years.
3. Overbeek R., Begley T., Butler R.M., Choudhuri J.V., Chuang H.Y., Cohoon M., de Crecy-Lagard V., Diaz N., Disz T., Edwards R., et al. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33 (2005) 5691-5702. This database represents a new chapter in the way in which we annotate genomes. Annotations in the SEED database are the result of expert curations of single 'subsystems' (a pathway or particular function) across all available genomes.
4. Shendure J., Porreca G.J., Reppas N.B., Lin X., McCutcheon J.P., Rosenbaum A.M., Wang M.D., Zhang K., Mitra R.D., and Church G.M. Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science 309 (2005) 1728-1732. Proof of principle of one of the ultra-high-throughput sequencing technologies applied to the sequencing of a strain of E. coli, which was shown to diverge from its last sequenced ancestor by a mere 200 generations.
5. Clarke S.C. Pyrosequencing: nucleotide sequencing technology with bacterial genotyping applications. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 5 (2005) 947-953
6. Edwards R.A., Rodriguez-Brito B., Wegley L., Haynes M., Breitbart M., Peterson D.M., Saar M.O., Alexander S., Alexander Jr. E.C., and Rohwer F. Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial ecology under extreme hydrogeologic conditions. BMC Genomics 7 (2006) 57. The first application of pyrosequencing technology for the characterization of the metagenomes of two microbial communities.
7. Martiny J.B.H., and Field D. Ecological perspectives on our complete genome collection. Ecol Lett 8 (2005) 1334-1345
8. Venter J.C., Remington K., Heidelberg J.F., Halpern A.L., Rusch D., Eisen J.A., Wu D.Y., Paulsen I., Nelson K.E., Nelson W., et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304 (2004) 66-74. Landmark study that opened the doors to the investigation of natural microbial communities using shotgun sequencing. It includes attempted reconstructions of genomes from dominant species.
9. Xu J. Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: concepts, tools, and recent advances. Mol Ecol 15 (2006) 1713-1731
10. Furrie E. A molecular revolution in the study of intestinal microflora. Gut 55 (2006) 141-143
11. 14 microorganisms whose collective genome (or 'microbiome') contains at least 100 times as many genes as our own genome. Metagenomic characterization of the gut community, as well as comparison to our bacterial genome collection, shows that humans are a 'super-organism' made up of eukaryotic and bacterial metabolic potential that is enriched for the production of amino acids, xenobiotics, methanogenesis, vitamins and other metabolites.
12. Tettelin H., Masignani V., Cieslewicz M.J., Donati C., Medini D., Ward N.L., Angiuoli S.V., Crabtree J., Jones A.L., Durkin A.S., et al. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial 'pan-genome'. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 13950-13955. In a comparison of seven S. agalactiae genomes it was found that each new strain contributed on average 33 new genes, thus firmly establishing the concept of the pan-genome.
13. Chen S.L., Hung C.S., Xu J., Reigstad C.S., Magrini V., Sabo A., Blasiar D., Bieri T., Meyer R.R., Ozersky P., et al. Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: a comparative genomics approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 (2006) 5977-5982. Good illustration of the power of comparative genomics to detect genes under selection. By analyzing seven E. coli genomes, it was also confirmed that the pan-genome of this species is vast - on average each new isolate contributes 441 new genes.
14. Medini D., Donati C., Tettelin H., Masignani V., and Rappuoli R. The microbial pan-genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15 (2005) 589-594. Useful review of the pan-genome concept and the mathematical models for calculating the extent of the pan-genome for different species on the basis of the availability of multiple genomes.
15. Purdy A., Rohwer F., Edwards R., Azam F., and Bartlett D.H. A glimpse into the expanded genome content of Vibrio cholerae through identification of genes present in environmental strains. J Bacteriol 187 (2005) 2992-3001
16. Velicer G.J., Raddatz G., Keller H., Deiss S., Lanz C., Dinkelacker I., and Schuster S.C. Comprehensive mutation identification in an evolved bacterial cooperator and its cheating ancestor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 (2006) 8107-8112
17. Fiegna F., Yu Y.T., Kadam S.V., and Velicer G.J. Evolution of an obligate social cheater to a superior cooperator. Nature 441 (2006) 310-314
18. van der Gast C.J., Lilley A.K., Ager D., and Thompson I.P. Island size and bacterial diversity in an archipelago of engineering machines. Environ Microbiol 7 (2005) 1220-1226
19. Bell T., Ager D., Song J.I., Newman J.A., Thompson I.P., Lilley A.K., and van der Gast C.J. Larger islands house more bacterial taxa. Science 308 (2005) 1884
20. Powell B.C., and Hutchison III C.A. Similarity-based gene detection: using COGs to find evolutionarily-conserved ORFs. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 31. This paper describes the use of clusters of orthologous genes to detect and correct unannotated genes in complete genomes.
21. Suhre K., Claverie J.M., and Fusion D.B. A database for in-depth analysis of prokaryotic gene fusion events. Nucleic Acids Res 32 (2004) D273-D276
22. Toh H., Weiss B.L., Perkin S.A., Yamashita A., Oshima K., Hattori M., and Aksoy S. Massive genome erosion and functional adaptations provide insights into the symbiotic lifestyle of Sodalis glossinidius in the tsetse host. Genome Res 16 (2006) 149-156
23. Pichon C., and Felden B. Small RNA genes expressed from Staphylococcus aureus genomic and pathogenicity islands with specific expression among pathogenic strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 14249-14254
24. Wilson G.A., Bertrand N., Patel Y., Hughes J.B., Feil E.J., and Field D. Orphans as taxonomically restricted and ecologically important genes. Microbiology 151 (2005) 2499-2501
25. Fukuchi S., and Nishikawa K. Estimation of the number of authentic orphan genes in bacterial genomes. DNA Res 11 (2004) 219-231 311-313
26. Raskin D.M., Seshadri R., Pukatzki S.U., and Mekalanos J.J. Bacterial genomics and pathogen evolution. Cell 124 (2006) 703-714
27. Ussery D.W., and Hallin P.F. Genome update: annotation quality in sequenced microbial genomes. Microbiology 150 (2004) 2015-2017
28. Sterk P., Kersey P.J., and Apweiler R. Genome reviews: standardising content and representation of information about complete genomes. OMICS 10 (2006) 114-118
29. Haft D.H., Selengut J.D., Brinkac L.M., Zafar N., and White O. Genome properties: a system for the investigation of prokaryotic genetic content for microbiology, genome annotation and comparative genomics. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 293-306. A database of 'assertions' about genomes derived from automated analysis of pathways and a variety of other traits. Curated information from the literature is also included.
30. Markowitz V.M., Korzeniewski F., Palaniappan K., Szeto E., Werner G., Padki A., Zhao X., Dubchak I., Hugenholtz P., Anderson I., et al. The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (2006) D344-D348. The Joint Genome Institute's IMG system (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/) is a major effort to provide an integrative environment that facilitates the genomic analysis of isolate organisms on a comparative level. Data can be organized by, for example, phylogeny, phenotypic or ecotypic properties.
31. Roberts R.J., Karp P., Kasif S., Linn S., and Buckley M.R. An Experimental Approach to Genome Annotation. Critical Issues Colloquia Report (2005), American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. Call for the systematic annotation of hypothetical and orphan genes using empirical methods.
32. Kolker E., Picone A.F., Galperin M.Y., Romine M.F., Higdon R., Makarova K.S., Kolker N., Anderson G.A., Qiu X., Auberry K.J., et al. Global profiling of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: expression of hypothetical genes and improved functional annotations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 2099-2104. Excellent demonstration of the use of transcriptomic approaches to the validation of genomic annotation.
33. Cochrane G., Bates K., Apweiler R., Tateno Y., Mashima J., Kosuge T., Mizrachi I.K., Schafer S., and Fetchko M. Evidence standards in experimental and inferential INSDC Third Party Annotation data. OMICS 10 (2006) 105-113
34. Vallenet D., Labarre L., Rouy Z., Barbe V., Bocs S., Cruveiller S., Lajus A., Pascal G., Scarpelli C., and Medigue C. MaGe: a microbial genome annotation system supported by synteny results. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (2006) 53-65
35. Ye Y., Osterman A., Overbeek R., and Godzik A. Automatic detection of subsystem/pathway variants in genome analysis. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) i478-i486
36. Rodriguez-Brito B., Rohwer F., and Edwards R.A. An application of statistics to comparative metagenomic. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 162. Statistical method for testing the significance of metabolic differences between two datasets for protein-function assignments.
37. Liolios K., Tavernarakis N., Hugenholtz P., and Kyrpides N.C. The genomes on line database (GOLD) v. 2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (2006) D332-D334. This updated version of GOLD contains a wide range of searchable, viewable and downloadable descriptive information about genomes curated from the literature.
38. Zhang K., Martiny A., Reppas N.B., Barry K.W., Malek J., Chisholm S.W., and Church G.M. Sequencing genomes from single cells by polymerase cloning. Nat Biotechnol 24 (2006) 680-686. Demonstration that genome sequencing can be accomplished from single cells without the need for cultivation.
39. Field D., and Hughes J. Cataloguing our current genome collection. Microbiology 151 (2005) 1016-1019
40. Field D., Morrison N., Selengut J.D., and Sterk P. Cataloguing our Current Genome Collection II. OMICS 10 (2006) 100-104
41. Hallin P.F., and Ussery D.W. CBS genome atlas database: a dynamic storage for bioinformatic results and sequence data. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) 3682-3686. Content continues to accumulate in this genomic database from the authors of the 'Genome Update' monthly column in Microbiology.
42. Knight C.G., Kassen R., Hebestreit H., and Rainey P.B. Global analysis of predicted proteomes: functional adaptation of physical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 (2004) 8390-8395
43. Ussery D.W., Binnewies T.T., Gouveia-Oliveira R., Jarmer H., and Hallin P.F. Genome update: DNA repeats in bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150 (2004) 3519-3521
44. Kiil K., Ferchaud J.B., David C., Binnewies T.T., Wu H., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Willenbrock H., and Ussery D.W. Genome update: distribution of two-component transduction systems in 250 bacterial genomes. Microbiology 151 (2005) 3447-3452
45. Rocha E.P. Inference and analysis of the relative stability of bacterial chromosomes. Mol Biol Evo 23 (2006) 513-522. Study of the loss of synteny in bacterial chromosomes.
46. Konstantinidis K.T., and Tiedje J.M. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 187 (2005) 6258-6264. Comparisons of shared gene content show that taxonomic classifications of these genomes might need to be revised in light of whole proteome information.
47. Ciccarelli F.D., Doerks T., von Mering C., Creevey C.J., Snel B., and Bork P. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311 (2006) 1283-1287. Genomes are an excellent source of phylogenetic markers. This study uses 31 orthologous loci, pruned for any cases of horizontal gene transfer from 191 genomes, to build the tree of life across all three domains.
48. Konstantinidis K.T., and Tiedje J.M. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 2567-2572. The concept of a species is notoriously difficult to apply to bacteria. This study compared the gene content of 70 closely related and fully sequenced bacterial genomes. The results suggest that species boundaries do appear to exist, but are more conservative than current species definitions, and are better drawn on the basis of both ecology on shared gene content (evolutionary distance).
49. Sturino J.M., and Klaenhammer T.R. Engineered bacteriophage-defence systems in bioprocessing. Nat Rev Microbiol 4 (2006) 395-404
50. Ward N., and Fraser C.M. How genomics has affected the concept of microbiology. Curr Opin Microbiol 8 (2005) 564-571. An excellent overview of how the comparison of microbial genomes with the genomes from fungi and viruses (such as the mimivirus, which has a genome size more than double than that of the smallest bacteria and contains tRNA genes) is changing our concept of what it means to be a bacterium.