A holistic pedagogical view of learning objects: Future directions for reuse

Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 43-64

  Van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748658473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613684     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Achtenhagen, F. (2001). Criteria for the development of complex teaching-learning environments. Instructional Science, 29, 361-380.
2. Ackermann, P. (1996). Developing object-oriented multimedia software. Heidelberg, Germany: Verlag fur digitale Technologie GmbH.
3. ADL Technical Team. (2001). Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORMT™) Version 1.2. The SCORM overview. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://www.adlnet.org
4. Anderson, L.W.,&Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
5. Arlow, J., & Neustadt, I. (2002). UML and the unified process: Practical object-oriented analysis and design. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson Education.
6. Barnett, R. (1997a). Towards a higher education for a new century. London: University of London, Institute of Education.
7. Barnett, R. (1997b). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
8. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D. L., Patel-Schneider, P. F., & Lynn, A. S. (2003). OWL web ontology language reference. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref
9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
10. Booch, G. (1994). Object-oriented analysis and design with applications. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
11. Boot, E.W.,&Veerman, A. L. (2003). Support tools for e-learning from a user perspective. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education, 7-9 July 2003, Marrakech, Morocco.
12. Boot, E.W., Veerman, A. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (submitted). Instructional development templates for domain experts.
13. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
14. CISCO White Paper. (2000). Reusable learning object strategy: Definition, creation process, and guidelines for building. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://www.digitalpipe.com/pdf/dp/white_papers/e_learning/Cisco_rlo_roi.pdf
15. Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Tech. Rep. No. 6899). Cambridge, MA: BBN Labs, Inc.
16. Collins, A., Brown, J. S.,&Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-493). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. de Croock, M. B. M., Paas, F., Schlanbusch, H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). ADAPTit: Tools for training design and evaluation. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(4), 47-58.
18. Descartes, R. (1960). Discourse on the method for rightly conducting the reason and seeking truth in the sciences (Trans. L. J. Lafleur). New York: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1637)
19. Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C.,&Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2), 55-72.
20. Fletcher, J., & Dodds, P. (2000). All about ADL. ASTD Learning Circuits, May 2000. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/may2000/fletcher.html
21. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
23. Hamel, C. J., & Ryan-Jones, D. (2002). Designing instruction with learning objects. International Journal of Educational Technology [online], 3(1). Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://www.ao.uiuc.edu/ijet/v3n1/hamel/index.html
24. Jochems,W., van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,&Koper, E. J. R. (Eds.). (2003). Integrated E-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology, and organization. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
25. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 371-396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (2001). Web-based training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
27. Koper, E. J. R. (2003). Combining re-usable learning resources and services to pedagogical purposeful units of learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to eLearning (pp. 46-59). London: Kogan Page.
28. Koper, E. J. R., & Manderveld, J. M. (2004). Educational modelling language: Modelling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 537-552.
29. Koper, E. J. R., Olivier, B.,&Anderson, T. (2002). IMS learning design information model: Final. Boston: IMS.
30. Leshin, C. B., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
31. Locatis, C.,&Al-Nuaim, H. (1999). Interactive technology and authoring tools: A historical reviewand analysis. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(3), 63-76.
32. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 278-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
34. Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1990a). Limitations of first generation instructional design (ID1). Educational Technology, 30(1), 7-11.
35. Merrill, M. D., Li, Z.,&Jones, M. K. (1990b). Second generation instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(2), 7-14.
36. Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1992). An introduction to instructional transaction theory. In S. Dijkstra, H. P. M. Krammer, & J. J. G. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Instructional models in computer-based learning environments (NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 104, pp. 15-41). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
37. Miller, E. (1998). An introduction to the Resource Description Framework. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(1), 15-19.
38. Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 241-267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Norman, G. R.,&Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557-565.
40. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Rosenberg, M. J. (2000). E-learning, strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 161-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Spector, J. M. (2001a). Tools and principles for the design of collaborative learning environments for complex domains. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(4), 483-510.
44. Spector, J. M. (2001b). Philosophical implications for the design of instruction. Instructional Science, 29, 381-402.
45. Spector, J. M.,&Anderson, T. M. (2000). Holistic and integrated perspectives on learning, technology, and instruction: Understanding complexity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J.,&Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441). Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
47. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J.,&Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33.
48. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,&Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
49. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
50. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID*-model. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(2), 39-64.
51. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Three worlds of instructional design: State of the art and future directions. Instructional Science, 29, 429-441.
52. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A.,&Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load of a learners' mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5-13.
53. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (Eds.). (2002). Computer-based tools for instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(4), special issue.
54. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Seel, N. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Mental models as a new foundation for instructional design. Educational Technology, 42(2), 60-66.
55. von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 294-754).
56. Wiley, D. A. (1999). Learning objects and the new CAI: So what do I do with a learning object? [Online]. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/instruct-arch.pdf
57. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A.Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/
58. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.