Amino acid residues that determine functional specificity of NADP- and NAD-dependent isocitrate and isopropylmalate dehydrogenases

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1001-1009

  Kalinina, Olga V ^a   Gelfand, Mikhail S ^a,b  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Isocitrate dehydrogenase; Protein function; Specificity determinants; Specificity determining positions (SDP)

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; OXIDOREDUCTASE; 3 ISOPROPYLMALATE DEHYDROGENASE;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELL METABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

3-ISOPROPYLMALATE DEHYDROGENASE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; DIMERIZATION; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE; NAD; NADP; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33748461246     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21027     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cozzone AJ. Regulation of acetate metabolism by protein phosphorylation in enteric bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 1998;52:127-164.
2. Hurley JH, Thorness PE, Ramalingam V, Helmers NH, Koshland DE Jr, Stroud RM. Structure of a bacterial enzyme regulated by phosphorylation, isocitrate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:8635-8639.
3. Cupp JR, McAlister-Henn L. NAD(+)-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. Clonong, nucleotide sequence, and disruption of the IDH2 gene from Saccharomyces cereviviae. J Biol Chem 1991;266:22199-22205.
4. Zhu G, Golding GB, Dean AM. The selective cause of an ancient adaptation. Science 2005;307:1279-1282.
5. Zhang T, Koshland DE Jr. Modeling substrate binding in Thermus thermophilus isopropylmalate dehydrogenase. Protein Sci 1995;4:84-92.
6. Imada K, Sato M, Katsube Y, Matsuura Y, Oshima T. Three-dimensional structure of a highly thermostable enzyme, 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase of Thermus thermophilus at 2.2 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1991;222:725-738.
7. Chen R, Greer A, Dean AM. A highly active decarboxylating dehydrogenase with rationally inverted coenzyme specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:11666-11670.
8. Dean AM, Shiau AK, Koshland DE Jr. Determinants of performance in the isocitrate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli. Protein Sci 1996;5:341-347.
9. Doyle SA, Fung S-YF, Koshland DE Jr. Redesigning the substrate specificity of an enzyme: isocitrate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 2000;39:14348-14355.
10. Steen IH, Lien T, Madsen MS, Birkeland N-K. Identification of the cofactor discrimination sites in NAD-isocitrate dehydrogenase from Pyrococcus furiosus. Arch Microbiol 2002;178:297-300.
11. Fujita M, Tamegai H, Eguchi T, Kakanuma K. Novel substrate specificity of designer 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2001;65:2695-2700.
12. Lee P, Colman R. Implication by site-directed mutagenesis of Arg314 and Tyr316 in the coenzyme site of pig mitochondrial NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. Arch Biochem Biophys 2002;401:81-90.
13. Soundar S, Park J-H, Huh T-L, Colman RF. Evaluation by mutagenesis of the importance of 3 arginines in alpha, beta and gamma subunits of human NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 2003;278:52146-52153.
14. Dean AM, Golding GB. Protein engineering reveals ancient adaptive replacements in isocitrate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:3104-3109.
15. Chen R, Greer A, Dean AM. Redesigning secondary structure to invert coenzyme specificity in isopropylmalate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:12171-12176.
16. Doyle SA, Beernink PT, Koshland DE Jr. Structural basis for a change in substrate specificity: crystal structure of S113E isocitrate dehydrogenase in a complex with isoporpylmalate, Mg2+ and NADP. Biochemistry 2001;40:4234-4241.
17. Hurley JH, Chen R, Dean AM. Determinants of cofactor specificity in isocitrate dehydrogenase: structure of an engineered NADP+→NAD+ specificity-reversal mutant. Biochemistry 1996;35:5670-5678.
18. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:4876-4882.
19. Felsenstein J. Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Methods Enzymol 1996;266:418-427.
20. Kalinina OV, Novichkov PS, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS, Rakhmaninova AB. SDPpred: a tool for prediction of amino acid residues that determine differences in functional specificity of homologous proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W424-W428.
21. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257:342-358.
22. Lichtarge O, Yamamoto KR, Cohen FE. Identification of functional surfaces of the zinc binding domains of intracellular receptors. J Mol Biol 1997;274:325-337.
23. Hannenhalli SS, Russell RB. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 2000;303:61-76.
24. Mirny LA, Gelfand MS. Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity-determining residues in bacterial transcription factors. J Mol Biol 2002;321:7-20.
25. Valencia A, Pazos F. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:368-373.
26. Donald JE, Shakhnovich EI. Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:4455-4465.
27. Bernstein HJ. Recent changes to RasMol, recombining the variants. Trends Biochem Sci 2000;25:353-355.
28. Lunzer M, Miller SP, Felsheim R, Dean AM. The biochemical architecture of an ancient adaptive landscape. Science 2005;310:499-501.
29. Xu X, Zhao J, Peng B, Huang Q, Arnold E, Ding J. Structure of human cytosolic NADP-dependent dehydrogenase reveals a novel self-regulatory mechanism of activity. J Biol Chem 2004;279:22946-33957.
30. Kalinina OV, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS, Rakhmaninova AB. Automated selection of positions determining functional specificity of proteins by comparative analysis of orthologous groups in protein families. Protein Sci 2004;13:443-456.
31. Kalinina OV, Gelfand MS, Mironov AA, Rakhmaninova AB. Amino acid residues forming specific contacts between subunits in tetramers of the membrane channel GlpF. Biophysics (Moscow) 2003;48:S141-S145.
32. Imada K, Inagaki K, Matsunami H, Kawaguchi H, Tanaka H, Tanaka N, Namba K. Structure of 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase at 2.0 A resolution: the role of Glu88 in the unique substrate-recognition mechanism. Structure 1998;6:971-982.
33. Dean AM, Dvorak L. The role of glutamate 87 in the kinetic mechanism of Thermus thermiphilus isopropylmalate dehydrogenase. Protein Sci 1995;4:2156-2167.
34. Miyazaki K, Yaoi T, Oshima T. Expression, purification, and substrate specificity of isocitrate dehydrogenase from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Eur J Biochem 1994;221:899-903.
35. Ceccarelli C, Grodsky NB, Ariyarante N, Colman RF, Bahson BJ. Crystal structure of the porcine mitochondrial NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase complexed with Mn2+ and isocitrate. J Biol Chem 2002;277:43454-434362.