Towards model-driven end-user development in CALL

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 19, Issue 2-3, 2006, Pages 149-191

  Farmer, Rod ^a   Gruba, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747611989     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220600821529     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Ackerman, M. S. (2000). The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2/3), 179-203.
2. Alavi, M. (1985). Some thoughts on quality issues of end-user developed systems. In J. C. Wetherbe (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference on Computer Personnel Research (pp. 200-207). Minneapolis, MN: ACM Press.
3. Ambler, S. W. (2003). Agile model driven development is good enough. IEEE Software, 20(5), 71-73.
4. Amoroso, D. L., & Cheney, P. H. (1992). Quality end user-developed applications: Some essential ingredients. ACM SIGMIS DATABASE, 23(1), 1-11.
5. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1995). Goal Question Metric paradigm. In Encyclopaedia of software engineering, Volume 1 (pp. 527-532). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Beck, K., & Andres, C. (2004). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. London: Addison-Wesley.
7. Beringer, J. (2004). Reducing expertise tension. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 39-40.
8. Berti, S., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2004). Natural development of ubiquitous interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 63-64.
9. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1999). Contextual design. Interactions, 6(1), 32-42.
11. Boehm, B. W., Clark, B., Horowitz, E., Westland, C., Madachy, R., & Selby, R. (1995). Cost models for future software life cycle processes: COCOMO 2.0. In J. Arthur & S. Henry (Eds.), Special issue on software process and product measurement, annals of software engineering. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Baltzer AG Science Publishers.
12. Bødker, S., & Iversen, O. (2002). Staging a professional participatory design practice: Moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In O. W. Bertelsen, S. Bødker, & K. Kuuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI 2002) (pp. 11-18). New York, NY: ACM Press.
13. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1992). Enacting design for the workplace. In P. S. Adler, & T. Winograd (Eds.), Usability: Turning technology into tools (pp. 164-197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Brusilovsky, P., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 156-169.
15. Burnett, M., Cook, C., & Rothermel, G. (2004). End-user software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 53-58.
16. Büscher, M., Gill, S., Mogensen, P., & Shapiro, D. (2001). Landscapes of practice: Bricolage as a method for situated design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 1-28.
17. Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2004). Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(3), 333-356.
18. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for testing, teaching and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Constantine, L. L., & Lockwood, L. A. D. (1999). Software for use: A practical guide to the models and methods of usage centred design. New York, NY: ACM Press.
20. Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Macmillan.
21. Costabile, M. F., Fogli, D., Fresta, G., Mussio, P., & Piccinno, A. (2003). Building environments for end-user development and tailoring. In J. Hosking, & P. Cox (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, Auckland, New Zealand (pp. 31-38). New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society Press.
22. Costabile, M. F., Fogli, D., Mussio, P., & Piccinno, A. (2005). A meta-design approach to end-user development. In M. Erwig, & A. Schürr (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'05) (pp. 308-310). Dallas, TX: IEEE Computer Society Press.
23. Costabile, M. F., Fogli, D., Mussio, P., & Piccinno, A. (2006). End-user development: The software shaping workshop approach. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End user development: Empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer/Springer.
24. Crabtree, A. (1998). Ethnography in participatory design. In R. Chatfield, S. Kuhn, & M. Muller (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Participatory Design (pp. 93-105). Seattle: Computer Professionals Social Responsibility.
25. Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
26. Donato, R., & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 453-464.
27. Edgington, T., Choi, B., Henson, K., Raghu, T. S., & Vinze, A. (2004). Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing. Communications of the ACM, 47(11), 85-90.
28. Euzenat, J., Loup, D., Touzani, M., & Valtchev, P. (2004). Ontology alignment with OLA. In S. A. McIlraith, D. Plexousakis, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based tools (ISWC-EON) (pp. 59-68). Hiroshima: CEUR-WS. Retrieved September 16, 2005, from http://www. ceur-ws.org
29. Farmer, R. A. (2006). Situated task analysis in learner-centred call. In P. Zaphiris, & G. Zacharia (Eds.), User-centred computer aided language learning (pp. 44-73). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
30. Farmer, R. A., & Gruba, P. (2004). Critical realism: A philosophical foundation for research in integrative CALL. In J. Colpaert, W. Decoo, M. Simons, & S. Van Beuren (Eds.), CALL and research methodologies: Proceedings of the Eleventh International conference on CALL (pp. 93-102). Belgium: University of Antwerp.
31. Farmer, R. A., & Gruba, P. (2006). Understanding the nature of task analysis in Web design. In P. Zaphiris, & S. Kurniawan (Eds.), Advances in universal web design and evaluation: Research, trends and opportunities. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
32. Farmer, R. A., & Hughes, B. (2005a). CASE: A framework for evaluating learner-computer interaction in computer-assisted language learning. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of SIGCHI-NZ (CHINZ 2005) (pp. 67-74). Auckland, New Zealand: ACM Press.
33. Farmer, R. A., & Hughes, B. (2005b). A classification-based framework for learning object assembly. In P. Goodyear, D. Sampson, D. Yang, Kinshuk, T. Okamoto, R. Hartley, & N-S. Chen. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technology (ICALT 2005) (pp. 4-6). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society Press.
34. Farmer, R. A., & Hughes, B. (2005c). A situated learning perspective on learning object design. In P. Goodyear, D. Sampson, D. Yang, Kinshuk, T. Okamoto, R. Hartley, & N-S. Chen. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technology (ICALT 2005) (pp. 72-74). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society Press.
35. Farmer, R. A., & Hughes, B. (2006). Pattern-based end-user development with learning objects. In Kinshuk & R. Koper (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Kerkrade, The Netherlands: IEEE Computer Society.
36. Farmer, R. A., & Hughes, B. (in press). Towards a personal cost model for end-user development. In M. Billinghurst (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of SIGCHI-NZ (CHINZ 2006). Auckland, New Zealand: ACM Press.
37. Farmer, R. A., Gruba, P., & Hughes, B. (2004). Towards principles for call software quality improvement. In J. Colpaert, W. Decoo, M. Simons, & S. Van Beuren (Eds.), CALL and research methodologies: Proceedings of the Eleventh International conference on CALL (pp. 103-113). Belgium: University of Antwerp.
38. Fischer, G. (2002). Beyond 'couch potatoes': From consumers to designers and active contributors. FirstMonday, 7(12). Retrieved January 12, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_12/ fischer
39. Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006). Meta-design: A framework for the future of end user development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End-User development-empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer/Springer Academic.
40. Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Ye, Y., Sutcliffe, A. G., & Mehandjiev, N. (2004). Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 33-37.
41. Frosch-Wilke, D. (2004). An extended and adaptable information model for learning objects. In Kinshuk, C.-K. Looi, E. Sutinen, D.G. Sampson, I. Aedo, L. Uden, & E. Kähkönen (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004). Joensuu, Finland: IEEE Computer Society.
42. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns. Elements of reusable object-oriented software. London: Addison-Wesley.
43. Gould, J. D., Boies, S. J., Levy, S., Richards, J. T., & Schoonard, J. (1987). The 1984 Olympic message systems: A test of behavioural principles of systems design. Communications of the ACM, 30(09), 758-769.
44. Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
45. Hoffman, R. R., & Palermo, D. S. (Eds.). (1991). Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
46. Howard, G. S. (1987). An agenda for research in end user computing. In L. Hutchinson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services. Kansas City, MO: ACM Press.
47. Hughes, B., & Farmer, R. A. (in press). Meta-data challenges for situational properties of learning objects. In Kinshuk & R. Koper (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Kerkrade, The Netherlands: IEEE Computer Society.
48. Humphrey, W. (1997). The personal software process. Reading, CA: Addison-Wesley.
49. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2002). IEEE standard for learning object meta-data. Technical report. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society Press.
50. Kroll, P., & Kruchten, P. (2003). The rational unified process made easy: A practitioner's guide to rational unified process. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
51. Lave, J., & Wenger, I. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Law, A., & Charron, R. (2005). Effects of agile practices on social factors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Workshop on Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering (HSSE) (pp. 1-5). St Louis: IEEE Computer Society.
53. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
54. Lieberman, H. (2000). Programming by example. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 72-74.
55. Lieberman, H. (2001a). Interfaces that given and take advice. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 475-485). London: Addison-Wesley.
56. Lieberman, H. (Ed.). (2001b). Your wish is my command: Programming by example. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann.
57. Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2006). End-user development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer/Springer.
58. Lowyck, J., & Pöysä, J. (2001). Design of collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17, 507-516.
59. Marra, R. (2005). Teacher beliefs: The impact of the design of constructivist learning environments on instructor epistemologies. Learning Environments Research, 8, 135-155.
60. McInerney, P., & Maurer, F. (2005). UCD in agile projects: Dream team or odd couple? Interactions, 12(6), 19-23.
61. Meservy, T. O., & Fenstermacher, K. D. (2005). Transforming software development: An MDA road map. Computer, 38(9), 52-58.
62. Mørch, A. I. (1998). Tailoring tools for system developments. Journal of End User Computing, 10(2), 22-30.
63. Myers, B. A. (2005). End-users in end-user software engineering: Where HCI cross cuts SE. In S. Erlbaum, & G. Rothermel (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on End-User Software Engineering (WEUSE), ICSE. St Louis, MO: ACM Press.
64. Naur, P., & Randell, B. (Eds.). (1968). Software engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO science committee. Gramisch: NATO Science Affairs Division. Retrieved March 3, 2002, from http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/ brian.randell/NATO
65. O'Connor, R., & Coleman, G. (2002). Strategies for personal software process improvement: A comparison. In 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'02) (pp. 1036-1040). New York: ACM Press.
66. OMG. (2001). Model-driven architecture. (Architecture Board, ORMSC/2001-07-01). Object Management Group.
67. Paternò, F. (2003). Towards a research agenda in end user development. In G. Cockton, & P. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI'03), Workshop on end-user development (pp. 69-73). Fort Lauderdale: ACM Press.
68. Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2003). Lean software development. London: Addison-Wesley.
69. Richmond, I. M. (1999). Is your CALL connected: Dedicated vs. integrated CALL. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design and applications (pp. 295-314). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
70. Rittel, H. (1984). Second-generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 317-327). New York, NY: Wiley.
71. Rivard, S., & Huff, S. L. (1988). Factors of success for end-user computing. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 552-561.
72. Rockhart, J., & Flannery, L. (1983). The management of end-user computing. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 776-784.
73. Rosengard, J.-M., & Ursu, M. F. (2004). Ontological representations of software patterns. In M. G. Negoita, R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (LNAI), Volume 3215 (pp. 31-37). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
74. Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (1993). Extending the task-artifact framework. In H. R. Hartson, & D. Hix (Eds.), Advanced in human-computer interaction (pp. 31-57). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
75. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (1999). The unified modelling language: User guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
76. Schach, S. R. (1999). Classical and object-oriented software engineering: With UML and Java. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International.
77. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with scrum. Redmond: Microsoft Press.
79. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
80. Sutcliffe, A. (2005). Evaluating the costs and benefits of end-user development. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on End-User Software Engineering (WEUSE), ICSE. St Louis: ACM Press.
81. Sutcliffe, A., & Mehandjiev, N. (2004). End-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 31-32.
82. Thomas, D. (2004). MDA: Revenge of the modelers or UML utopia. IEEE Software, 23(3), 15-17.
83. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84. Warschauer, M., & Kerns, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
85. Wiley, D. A. (Ed.). (2002). Instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington: Agency for Instructional Design.
86. Wilson, A., et al. (2003). Harnessing curiosity to increase correctness in end-user programming. In G. Cockton & P. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp 305-312). Fort Lauderdale: ACM Press.
87. Wulf, V., & Jarke, M. (2004). The economics of end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 41-42.