Situated task analysis in learner-centred CALL

User-Centered Computer Aided Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 44-72

  Farmer, Roderick A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899369645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-750-8.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Ackerman, M. S. (2000). The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 179-203.
2. Albers, M. J. (1998). Goal-driven task analysis: Improving situation awareness for complex problem solving. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 234-242). Quebec, Canada: ACM Publishing.
3. Balbo, S., Ozkan, N., & Paris, C. (2004). Choosing the right task-modelling notation: A taxonomy. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 435-465). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bardram, J. E. (1998). Plans as situated action: an activity theory approach to workflow systems. In J. A. Hughes, W. Prinz, T. Rodden, & K. I. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 17-32). Lancaster, UK: Kluwer.
5. Barnard, P. J., May, J., Duke, D., & Duce, D. (2000). Systems, interactions and macrotheory. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 7, 222-262.
6. Barson, J., & Debski, R. (1996). Calling back CALL: Technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency, and goal-oriented activity. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 49-68). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.
7. Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer-mediated change. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and humancomputer interaction (pp. 123-146). Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1999). Contextual design. Interactions, 6(1), 32-42.
10. Bødker, S. (2000). Scenarios in user-centred design: Setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with computers, 13, 61-75.
11. Bødker, S., Grønbæk, K., & Kyng, M. (1993). Cooperative design: Techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. 157-176). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Bødker, S., Petersen, M., & Nielsen, C. (2000). Creativity, cooperation and interactive design. In S. Bødker, C. Nielsen, & M. G. Petersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on DesigningInteractive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 252-261). New York: ACM Press.
13. Boehm, B., Egyed, A., Kwan, J., Port, D., Shah, A., & Madachy, R. (1998). Using the Win/Win Spiral Model: A case study. IEEE Computer, July, 33-44.
14. Brna, P., & Cox, R. (1998). Adding intelligence to a learning environment: Learner-centred design. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 14(4), 268-278.
15. Carroll, J. M. (1994). Making use a design representation. Communications of the ACM, 37, 29-35.
16. Carroll, J. M. (Ed.) (1995). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Carroll, J. M. (1996). Becoming social: Expanding scenario-based approaches in HCI. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(4), 266-275.
18. Carroll, J. M. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 501-522.
19. Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13, 43-60.
20. Carroll, J. M. (2002). Making use is more than a matter of task analysis. Interacting with Computers, 14, 619-627.
21. Carroll, J. M., Kellogg, W. A., & Rosson, M. B. (1991). The task-artifact cycle. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 74-102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Chapelle, C. (1994). CALL activities: Are they all the same? System, 22, 33-45.
23. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for testing, teaching and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Checkland, P. (1999). Soft systems methodology in action. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. th International Conference on CALL. Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen.
27. Costabile, M. F. (2001). Usability in the software life cycle. In S. K. Chang (Ed.), Handbook of software engineering and knowledge engineering (vol. 1, pp. 179-192). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
28. Crabtree, A. (1998). Ethnography in participatory design. In R. Chatfield, S. Kuhn, & M. Muller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Participatory Design Conference (pp 93-105). Palo Alto, CA: Computer Professionals as Social Responsibility.
29. Debski, R. (2003). Analysis of research in CALL (1988-2000) with a reflection on CALL as an academic discipline. ReCALL, 15(2), 177-188.
30. Diaper, D. (2004). Understanding task analysis for human-computer interaction. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 5-49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Donato, R., & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 453-464.
32. Ellis, R. (1996). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Endsley, M. R. (2000). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In M. R. Endsley & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 3-33). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
35. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrøm, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-39). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. A. (2001). Social translucence: Designing systems that support social processes. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 324-336). London: Addison-Wesley.
37. Farmer, R. A. (2005). Multimodal speech recognition errors and second language acquisition: An activity theoretic account. Sixième colloque des Usages des Nouvelles Technologies dans l'Enseignement des Langues Etrangères (UNTELE 2005). Compiègne: Université de Technologie de Compiègne.
38. Farmer, R. A., & Gruba, P. (2004). Critical realism: A philosophical foundation for research in integrative CALL. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on CALL. (pp. 93-102). Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen.
39. th International Conference on CALL (pp. 103-113). Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen.
40. rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05). Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society Press.
41. rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05). Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society Press.
42. Flor, N., & Hutchins, E. (1991). Analysing distributed cognition in software teams: A case study of team programming during perfective software maintenance. In J. Koenemann-Belliveau et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers (pp. 36-59). Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
43. Gasson, S. (1999). A social action model of situated information systems design. The DATA BASE for Advanced in Information Systems, 30(2), 82-97.
44. Go, K., & Carroll, J.M. (2004). Scenario-based task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of tasks analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 117-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Gruba, P. (2004). Computer-assisted language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 623-648). Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Hémard, D. (1999). A methodology for designing student-centred hypermedia CALL. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computerassisted language learning (pp. 215-229). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
47. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2001). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 77-94). London: Addison-Wesley.
48. Holtzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. (1993). Making customer-centred design work for teams. Communications of the ACM, 36(10), 93-103.
49. Hoven, D. (1999). CALL-ing the learner into focus: Towards a learner-centred model. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 149-169). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
50. Hubbard, P. (1992). A methodological framework for CALL courseware development. In M. C. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective (pp. 39-66). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
51. Hubbard, P. (1996). Elements of CALL methodology: Development, evaluation, and implementation. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 15-33). Houston, TX: Athelstan Publications.
52. Hutchins, E. (1995a).Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
54. Kaptelinin, V. (1996a). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103-116). Cambridge: MIT Press.
55. Kaptelinin, V. (1996b). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-69). Cambridge: MIT Press.
56. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., & Macaulay, C. (1999, July/August). The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions, 27-39.
57. Kieras, D. (2004). GOMS models for task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 83-116). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Kroll, P., & Kruchten, P. (2003). The rational unified process made easy: A practitioner's guide to rational unified process. New York: Addison-Wesley.
59. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993). The name of the task and the task of naming: Methodological aspects of task-based pedagogy. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 69-96). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
60. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Lave, J. (1998). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Lave, J., & Wegner, I. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall.
64. Leont'ev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress.
65. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
66. Moran, T.P., & Carroll, J.M. (1996). Overview of design rationale. In T.P. Moran & J.M. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques and use (pp. 1-20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Nardi, B.A. (1996a). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7-16). Cambridge: MIT Press.
68. Nardi, B.A. (1996b). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge: MIT Press.
69. Nardi, B.A. (Ed.) (1996c). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
70. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
71. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Preece, Y., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (Eds.) (1994). Human-computer interaction. London: Addison-Wesley.
73. Quintana, C., Carra, A., Krjcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2001). Learner-centred design: Reflections and new directions. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 607-626). London: Addison-Wesley.
74. Raeithel, A., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (1996). Joint attention and co-construction of tasks: New ways to foster user-designer collaboration. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 199-234). Cambridge: MIT Press.
75. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
76. Richmond, I. M. (1999). Is your CALL connected: Dedicated vs. integrated CALL. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design and applications (pp. 295-314). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
77. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources and second language syllabus design: A triadic theory of task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and decond language instruction (pp. 285-317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Rosenberg, D., Foley, S., Lievonen, M., Kammas, S., & Crisp, M.J. (2005). Interaction spaces in computer-mediated communication. AI & Society, 19, 22-33.
79. th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 328-338). New York: IEEE Computing Society.
80. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (1999). The unified modelling language: User guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
81. Sanderson, P. M. (1998). Cognitive work analysis and the analysis, design and evaluation of human-computer interactive systems. Proceedings of the Australalian Conference on Computer Human Interaction (pp. 220-227). New York: IEEE Computer Society.
82. Sanderson, P. M. (2003). Cognitive work analysis. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories and framework: Toward an interdisciplinary science. New York: Morgan Kaufman.
83. th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill International.
84. Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. (Eds.) (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.
86. Soloway, E., Jackson, S. L., Klein, J., Quintana, C., Reed, J., Spitulnik, J., Stratford, S. J., Studer, S., Jul, S., Eng, J., & Scala, N. (1996). Learning theory in practice: Case studies of learner-centered design. In M. J. Tauber (Ed.), Proceedings of CHI'96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 189-196). New York: Addison-Wesley.
87. Stanton, N. (2004). The psychology of task analysis today. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 569-584). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Stevens, V. (1989). A direction for CALL: From behavioristic to humanistic courseware. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Teaching languages with computers (pp. 29-43). La Jolla, CA: Athelstan Publications.
89. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-computer communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
90. Turner, P., & McEwan, T. (2004). Activity theory: Another perspective on task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for humancomputer interaction (pp. 423-440). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91. Velichkovsky, B. M. (1990). The vertical dimension of mental functioning. Psychological Research, 52, 282-293.
92. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
93. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
94. Watts, L. A., & Monk, A. F. (1998). Reasoning about tasks, activities and technology to support collaboration. Ergonomics, 4(11), 1583-1606.
95. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L. & Nardi, B. A. (2000). Let's stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: A reference task agenda for HCI. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 75-106.