Tobacco Denormalization and Industry Beliefs Among Smokers from Four Countries

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 225-232

  Hammond, David ^a   Fong, Geoffrey T ^a   Zanna, Mark P ^a   Thrasher, James F ^b   Borland, Ron ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WORKPLACE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL ALIENATION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746833710     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among young people. a report of the Surgeon General, 1994 (1994), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA
2. Mayhew K.P., Flay B.R., and Mott J.A. Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 59 suppl 1 (2000) S61-S81
3. Flay B.R., Hu F.B., and Richardson J. Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Prev Med 27 (1998) A9-A18
4. Pollay R.W. Targeting youth and concerned smokers. evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 9 (2000) 136-147
5. Cummings K.M., Morley C.P., Horan J.K., Steger C., and Leavell N.R. Marketing to America's youth. evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control 11 suppl 1 (2002) 15-17
6. Ling P.M., and Glantz S.A. Using tobacco-industry marketing research to design more effective tobacco-control campaigns. JAMA 287 (2002) 2983-2989
7. Ling P.M., and Glantz S.A. Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults. evidence from industry documents. Am J Public Health 92 (2002) 908-916
8. Tobacco Control Section. A model for change. the California experience in tobacco control (1998), California Department of Health Services, Sacramento October 3
9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A historical review of efforts to reduce smoking in the United States. Reducing tobacco use. a report of the Surgeon General (2000), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA 29-52
10. Blum A. Medicine vs. Madison Avenue. Fighting smoke with smoke. JAMA 243 (1980) 739-740
11. Blum A. Paid counter-advertising. proven strategy to combat tobacco use and promotion. Am J Prev Med 10 suppl 3 (1994) 8-10
12. Tobacco Control Section. A model for change. the California experience in tobacco control (1998), California Department of Health Services, Sacramento October 23
13. Evans D., Wasserman J., Bertolotti E., and Martino S. Branding behavior. the strategy behind the truth campaign. Social Marketing Q 3 (2002) 17-29
14. Hersey J.C., Niederdeppe J., Evans W.D., et al. The theory of "truth". how counter-industry campaigns affect smoking behavior among teens. Health Psychol 24 (2005) 22-31
15. Bal D.G., Kizer K.W., Felten P.G., Mozar H.N., and Niemeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. JAMA 264 (1990) 1570-1574
16. Dorfman L., and Wallack L. Advertising health. the case for counter-ads. Public Health Rep 108 (1993) 716-726
17. Wakefield M., and Chaloupka F.J. Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tob Control 9 (2000) 177-186
18. Goldman L.K., and Glantz S.A. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 279 (1998) 772-777
19. Siegel M., and Biener L. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking. results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health 90 (2000) 380-386
20. Sly D.F., Heald G.R., and Ray S. The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation. design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control 10 (2001) 9-15
21. Farrelly M.C., Healton C.G., Davis K.C., Messeri P., Hersey J.C., and Haviland M.L. Getting to the truth. evaluating national tobacco coutermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 92 (2002) 901-907
22. Popham W.J., Potter L.D., Bal D.G., Johnson M.D., Duerr J.M., and Quinn V. Do anti-smoking media campaigns help smokers quit?. Public Health Rep 108 (1993) 510-513
23. Steering Committee of the National Strategy to Reduce Tobacco Use in Canada. New direction for tobacco control in Canada. a national strategy (1999), Health Canada, Ottawa. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/alt_formats/cmcd-dcmc/rtf/media/releases-communique/1999/99picebk6.rtf Available at: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/alt_formats/cmcd-dcmc/rtf/media/releases-communique/1999/99picebk6.rtf. Accessed January 18, 2006.
24. Balbach E.D., and Glantz S.A. Tobacco control advocates must demand high-quality media campaigns. the California experience. Tob Control 7 (1998) 397-408
25. Ibrahim J.K., and Glantz S.A. Tobacco industry litigation strategies to oppose tobacco control media campaigns. Tob Control 15 (2006) 50-58
26. Hersey J.C., Niederdeppe J., Evans W.D., et al. The effects of state counter-industry media campaigns on beliefs, attitudes, and smoking status among teens and young adults. Prev Med 37 (2003) 544-552
27. Arheart K.L., Sly D.F., Trapido E.J., Rodriguez R.D., and Ellestad A.J. Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy. Prev Med 39 (2004) 909-918
28. Wakefield M., Morley C., Horan J.K., and Cummings K.M. The cigarette pack as image. new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 11 suppl 1 (2002) I73-I80
29. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing tobacco use. a report of the Surgeon General (2000), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA
30. Binson D., Canchola J.A., and Catania J.A. Random selection in a national telephone survey. a comparison of the Kish, next-birthday, and last-birthday methods. J Off Stat 16 (2000) 53-60
31. Singer E., van Hoewyk J., and Maher M.P. Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. Public Opin Q 64 (2000) 171-188
32. Heatherton T.F., Koslowski L.T., Frecker R.C., Rickert W.S., and Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict 84 (1989) 791-800
33. Hyland A., Borland R., Li Q., et al. Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviors among participants in the International Tobacco Control Collaboration Policy Evaluation Study. Tob Control 15 Suppl 3 (2006) iii83-iii94
34. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables (1989), John Wiley & Sons, New York
35. Fong G.T., Hammond D., Laux F.L., et al. The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries. findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 6 (2004) S341-S352
36. Slovic P. Cigarette smokers. rational actors or rational fools. In: Slovic P. (Ed). Smoking. risk, perception, and policy (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks CA 97-126
37. Siahpush M., McNeill A., Borland R., and Fong G. Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy and intention to quit across four countries. findings from the International Policy Evaluation Survey. Tob Control 15 Suppl 3 (2006) iii71-iii75
38. Netemeyer R.G., Andrews J.C., and Burton S. Effects of antismoking advertising-based beliefs on adult smokers' consideration of quitting. Am J Public Health 95 (2005) 1062-1066
39. Ashley M.J., and Cohen J.E. What the public thinks about the tobacco industry and its products. Tob Control 12 (2003) 396-400
40. Borland R., Fong G.T., Cummings K.M., Hastings G., and Hammond D. Attitudes toward the tobacco industry and government interventions across four countries. findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (2004), Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Conference, Scottsdale AZ February 18-21
41. Tang H., Cowling D.W., Lloyd J.C., et al. Changes of attitudes and patronage behaviors in response to a smoke-free bar law. Am J Public Health 93 (2003) 611-617
42. Laforge R.F., Velicer W.F., Levesque D.A., et al. Measuring support for tobacco control policy in selected areas of six countries. Tob Control 7 (1998) 241-246
43. Gottlieb N.H., Eriksen M.P., Lovato C.Y., Weinstein R.P., and Green L.W. Impact of a restrictive work site smoking policy on smoking behavior, attitudes, and norms. J Occup Med 32 (1990) 16-23
44. Hammond D., Fong G.T., McDonald P.W., Cameron R., and Brown K.S. The impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking. Tob Control 12 (2003) 391-395
45. Hammond D., Fong G.T., Borland R., McNeill A., Cummings K.M., and Hastings G. Health knowledge and tobacco labeling policy. findings from the International Tobacco Control Evaluation Survey. Tob Control 15 Suppl 3 (2006) iii19-iii25