Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour

Tobacco Control

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 391-395

  Hammond, D ^a   Fong, G T ^a,b   McDonald, P W ^a,c   Cameron, R ^a,c   Brown, K S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ONTARIO TOBACCO RESEARCH UNIT   (Canada)

^c Societe canadienne du cancer   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CANADA; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COGNITION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; POLICY; POPULATION; PREDICTION; PUBLIC OPINION; READING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THINKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; ONTARIO; PRODUCT LABELING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE;

EID: 2442458317     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.4.391     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jah P, Chaloupka FJ, eds. Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington DC: World Bank, 1999.
2. Strahan EJ, Fabrigar LR, Fong GT, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of message labels on tobacco packaging: a social psychological perspective. Tobacco Control 2002;11:183-90.
3. Tandemar Research. Cigarette packaging study: the evaluation of new health warning messages. Report for Health Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada, 1996.
4. Environics Research Group. Baseline surveys: The health effects of tobacco and health warning messages on cigarette packages. Report for Health Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada, 2001.
5. Hill D. New cigarette-packet warnings: are they getting through? Med J Aust 1988;148:478-80.
6. Borland R. Tobacco health warnings and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours. Addiction 1997;92:1427-35.
7. Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Statistical Assoc 1978;73:40-6.
8. O'Rourke D, Blair J. Improving random respondent selection in telephone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 1983;20:428-32.
9. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Best practices for survey and public opinion research and survey practices that AAPOR condemns. AAPOR, 2001.
10. Anderson, JR. Cognitive psychology and its implications, 3rd ed. New York: WH Freedman, 1990.
11. Health Canada. Trends in smoking 2000. Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey (CTUMS). Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada, 2001.
12. Krugman DM, Fox RJ, Fletcher JE, et al. Do adolescents attend to warnings in cigarette advertising? An eye tracking approach. Journal of Advertising Research 1994;Nov/Dec:39-52.
13. Fischer PM, Richards EJB, Krugman DM. Recall and eye tracking study of adolescents viewing tobacco advertisements. JAMA 1989;261:84-9.
14. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, et al. Graphic cigarette warning labels do not lead to adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. Am J Public Health (in press).
15. Fong GT, Cameron AJR, Brown KS, et al. Effects of the Canadian graphic warning labels among high school students: a quasi-experimental longitudinal survey. Paper presented at the 2002 National Conference on Tobacco or Health: San Francisco, California, 2002.