The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents

Tobacco Control

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL.1, 2002, Pages

  Wakefield, M ^a   Morley, C ^b   Horan, J K ^b   Cummings, K M ^b  

^a CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

^b ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PACKAGING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; STANDARD; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADVERTISING; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0002837575     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Armstrong G, Kotler P. Marketing: an introduction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000
2. Solomon M, Bamossy G, Askegaard S. Consumer behaviour a European perspective. New Jersey. Prentice Hall, 1999
3. Shimp T. Advertising, promotion and supplemental aspects of integrated marketing communications, 5 ed. Dryden Press, 2000
4. McCarthy EJ. Basic marketing: a managerial approach Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1960
5. Slade J. The pack as an advertisement. Tobacco Control 1997;6:169-70.
6. Koten J. Tobacco marketer's success formula make cigarettes in smoker's own image Wall Street Journal 1980; February 29: p 22.
7. Pollay RW. Is outdoor advertising FAIR to children? Expert opinion in FAIR vs City of Chicago (97C7619) TIPS Working Paper 98.1. History of Advertising Archives, Faculty of Commerce, University of British Columbia, April 1998.
8. Cummings KM, Hyland A, Lewit E, Shopland D Discrepancies in cigarette brand sales and adult market share, are new teen smokers filling the gap? Tobacco Control 1997;6(suppl).538-43
9. DiFranza JR, Eddy JJ, Brown LF, et al. Tobacco acquisition and cigarette brand selection among youth Tobacco Control 1994;3:334-8.
10. Pollay RW Targeting youth and concerned smokers, evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents Tobacco Control 2000;9-136-47.
11. Thiboudeau M, Martin J Smoke gets in your eyes: branding and cigarette design in cigarette packaging New York: Abbeville Press, 2000.
12. Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer. Health warnings and product labelling on tobacco products. Melbourne: Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria, 1992.
13. Borland R. Tobacco health warnings and smoking-related beliefs and behaviours Addiction 1997;92:1427-35.
14. Borland R, Hill D The path to Australia's tobacco health warnings. Addiction 1997;92:1151-7.
15. Environics Research Group Limited. Health warnings testing: final report. Prepared for Health Canada Ottawa, June 24, 1999.
16. Environics Research Group Limited. Testing new health warning messages for cigarette packages: a summary of three phases of focus group research. Final Report prepared for Health Canada. May, 2000.
17. Centre for Health Promotion. Effects of plain packaging on the image of tobacco products among youth. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto, November 30, 1993
18. Beede P, Lawson R. Brand image attraction: the promotional impact of cigarette packaging NZ Family Physician 1991;18 175-7.
19. Beede P, Lawson R. The effect of plain packages on the perception of cigarette health warnings. Public Health 1992;106:315-22.
20. Mahood G. Warnings that tell the truth: breaking new ground in Canada Tobacco Control 1999;8:356-62.
21. Anon. Marlboro advertising brief for Leo Burnett Australia, 23 July, 1984 Bates 2023265680-2023265683. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2023265680/5683
22. Myers HM, Lubliner MJ. The marketer's guide to successful package design. Chicago, Illinois: NTC Business Books, 1998
23. Cheskin L. Philip Morris launches an expansion program Secrets of Marketing Success. New York. Trident Press, 1967.
24. Lyon DG. Off Madison Avenue. New York: GP Putnam, 1966:65-6
25. Ferris R. The influence of brand identification and imagery on subjective evaluation of cigarettes British-American Tobacco Co Ltd Group, July 18, 1980 Access date: 13 September 2001 Bates No 400235714-400235752. URL: http://outside.cdc.gov:8080/BASIS/ncctld/web/mnimages/EDW?W=DETAILSID=26302
26. Miller A. Arthur D Little Inc. Development of Cigarette Packaging, Liggett and Myers, #194, p, 17. October 14, 1963. Originally acquired from http://www.gate.net/-jcannon/liggett/#top (website no longer active). Presently available in the Roswell Pack Youth and Marketing Collection linked through http://roswell.tobaccodocuments.org, document # 194
27. Philip Morris, Marketing New Products in a Restrictive Environment June 1990. Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No 2044762173-2364. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2044762173/2364
28. Miller L Principles of measurement of visual standout in pack design. Report No. RD 2039 Restricted Group Research & Development Centre, British American Tobacco Co Ltd, May 23, 1986. Bates No 102699347-102699500
29. Bogie JC Approval recommendation - Lucky Strike Package Design Exploratory, Memo to RE Smith, January 7, 1991, American Tobacco Company Bates No. 970530514-970530521
30. Anon Product communication in the context of varying degree of ad restrictions, Behavioural Re search/Smoker Studies Seminar, Viking Inn, Canada, 1980 Brown & Williamson, Bates No 542003674-542003684.
31. Anon. The Pack the People Picked Philip Morris. July, 1970. Access date: September 3, 2001 Bates No. 2501265559-5565. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getollimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2501265559/5565
32. Kuhn F Pack Recognition Research Philip Morris December 17, 1987. Access date September 3, 2001. Bates 2040214382-2040214387. http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2040214382/4387
33. Bogie C Approval recommendation - Lucky Strike Package Design Exploratory, Memo to RE Smith, October 23, 1990, American Tobacco Company, Bates No 970135576-970135580.
34. Kozlowski LT, Pillitteri JL Compensation for nicotine by smokers of lower-yield cigarettes. In The FTC cigarette test method for determining tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of US cigarettes: report of the NCI expert committee Bethesda' Maryland: National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and human Services, 1996:161-72
35. Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tobacco Control 2002;11 (suppl 1):i18-31.
36. Etzel E Consumer research proposal Camel Filter revised packaging Test Study. RJ Reynolds. March 2, 1979 Access date: September 17, 2001. Bates No 500566627-500566632. URL: http://www.rjrtdocs.com/rjrtdocs/image_viewer.dms? DOC_RANGE=500566627+-6632&SEARCH=486&CAMEFROM= 1 &PS=1
37. Phillip Morris. Morlboro Ultra Light Pack Study Top-line Results. February 9, 1981. Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No. 2048718182-8194. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2048718182/8194
38. Isaacs J. Identified HTI test of Marlboro Ultra Lights in a blue pack versus Marlboro Ultra Lights in a red pack Philip Morris. July, 1981 Access date. 17 September 2001 Bates No. 204387079-204387089. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2047387079/7089
39. Dennis D Memo to CP Loh. The effects of soft pack versus box packaging of test cigarettes on consumer perceptions. Philip Morris. August 26, 1982. Access date September 17, 2001 Bates No 1000409218/9239 URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2051989496
40. Martin PG. Two pastel green menthol field tests. Philip Morris. September 1973. Access No September 17, 2001. Bates No. 1000352340-1000354495. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2062951967/2115
41. Howes R National Test Ranking: Saratoga Menthol, More Menthol, Saratoga Menthol with Green Paper Philip Morris. July 1976. Access Date: September 3, 2001. Bates No. 1000361781-1794 URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?it=avpidx&DOCID=1000361781/1794
42. Greene R. Green (chlorophyll coated) wrapper menthol cigarettes. Philip Morris. April 4, 1978 Access date: September 17, 2001 Bates No 1000368490/8507 URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=1000368490/8507
43. Martin P. Two national POL mailout tests: Philip Morris. March 27, 1973. Access date: September 17, 2001. Bates 1000724909-1000724911 http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=1000724909/4911
44. Freeservers, Inc. Growth of menthol cigarettes. Access date. October 18, 2001 URL: http://goodhealth.freeservers.com/ mentholCigGrowth.htm
45. Belch GE, Belch MA. Advertising and promotion: an integrated marketing communications perspective. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1998.
46. Anon. Opportunities in packaging innovation Philip Morris March 1992 Access date September 17, 2001. Bates No.2023162454-2023162473. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2048976191/6208
47. Philip Morris, Marketing perceptions [Untitled research report on marketing perceptions]. April 1992. Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No. 2060037883-7936. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2051989072/9123
48. Jones, J Results of the 1985 alternate packaging study Philip Morris November 1, 1985. Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No. 2051989072-9325. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2051989072/9123
49. Lancaster, W. Zack Tracking/attitude research request Lorillard August 15, 1974. Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No: 91260420. URL: http://www.lorillarddocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avlidx&DOCID=91260420
50. Don, Will Graham Company. Confidential: Memo to Will, Frank, Linda, Bill, Norman, Bob and Pat]. Lorrillard. February 3, 1975 Access date: September 3, 2001 Bates No. 91257214-7216 URL: http://www.lorillarddocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avlidx&DOCID=91257214/7216
51. Standen C. Product and packaging: recommended next steps "Turk" test market. RJ Reynolds. May 25, 1973. Access date: 18 September 2001. Bates No. 500725191. URL: http://www.rjrtdocs.com/rjrtdocs/ ImageDownloader.dms?DOC_RANGE=500354766+-4766&PDF=true
52. Shostak JR Topline: Camel Lights new pack focus groups (RIO) October 17, 1980, Bates 500684272-500684288
53. Ricci E Newport Lights box basis for interest. Lorillard Tobacco Company January 5, 1979 Access date: September 17,2001 Bates No 85087247-850872454. URL: http://www.lorillarddocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avlidx&DOCID=85087247/7254
54. Jones J, Johnston M. Packaging preference among smokers of 85mm menthol brands. Philip Morris. July 26, 1985 Access date: Bates No 2051989326-9363. URL:http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2051989326/9363
55. Unisearch. A qualitative investigation of Old Gold Filters, December 1978, Bates 85395177-85395183
56. Cohen C. Virginia Slims King Size packaging/plans. Philip Morris. April 23, 1992 Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No. 2054865625-5628. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2054865625
57. Colmar Bruntan Research. Qualitative Research Alpine Creative Presentation Philip Morris, March 1994. Access date: September 3, 2001. Bates No. 2504102678-2701. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=2504102678/2701
58. Opinion Research Corporation. Smoking behavior and smoker motivation, their Implications for Packaging. Philip Morris November 1961 Access date: September 17, 2001. Bates No. 100811426-1001811544. URL: http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=1001811426/1544
59. US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress A report of the Surgeon General, 1989 Rockville, Maryland: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Office on Smoking and Health, 1989 [DHHS Publication No (CDC) 898411]
60. Saffer H Economic issues in cigarette and alcohol advertising J Drug Issues 1998;28:781-93
61. Hastings GB, MacFadyen L. A day in the life of an advertising man: review of internal documents from the UK tobacco industry's principal advertising agencies. BMJ 2000;321 366-71.
62. Saffer H, Chaloupka F The effect of tobacco advertising on tobacco consumption. Journal of Health Economics 2000;19:1117-37
63. Chaloupka F, Slater S, Wakefield M. USA price cuts and point of sale ads follow tax rise. Tobacco Control 1999;8:242-6.
64. Slater S, Chaloupka F, Wakefield M. State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes Tobacco Control 2001;10:337-9.
65. Wakefield M, Terry Y, Chaloupka F, et al Tobacco industry marketing at the point-of-purchase after the 1998 MSA billboard advertising ban Am J Public Health (in press)
66. Beardi C. RJR extends Winston line. Advertising Age May 21, 2001.
67. Rossel S. Special cigarette packaging: new shapes could set a benchmark. Interview between Stephanie Rossel and Professor Peter Zac Tobacco Journal International 2001, April 4 www.tobaccojournal.com
68. Barnsley K, Jacobs M Tobacco advertising and display of tobacco products at point of sale: Tasmania, Australia. Tobacco Control 2000;9:230-2.
69. Framework Convention Alliance. Packaging and labelling in the FCTC: Recommended text. Briefing papers INB3. URL: http://www.fctc.org/INB3brief_label.pdf
70. Kozlowski LT, Yost B, Stine MM, et al. Massachusetts' advertising against light cigarettes appears to change beliefs and behavior. Am J Prey Med 2000;18:339-42.
71. Kozlowski LT, Palmer R, Stine MM, et al Persistent effects of a message counter-marketing light cigarettes results of a randomized controlled trial. Addict Behav 2001;26:447-52