Technology-based new product development partnerships

Decision Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 117-147

  Ettlie, John E ^a   Pavlou, Paul A ^b  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Codevelopment Process Models; Competitive Capabilities; Field Studies; Innovation Process; New Product Development; Partial Least Squares; Survey Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746237883     PISSN: 00117315     EISSN: 15405915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2006.00119.x     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Adler, P. S., Mandelbaum, A., Nguyen, V., & Schwerer, E. (1996). Getting the most out of your new product development. Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 134-147.
2. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning-A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 107-136.
3. Armstrong, J. (2004a). Ford caves in on contracts. Automotive News, July 19, 42.
4. Armstrong, J. (2004b). European suppliers thrive on high-tech, high margins. Automotive News, August 23, 16.
5. Balasubramanian, R., & Baumgardner, S. (2004). Good supplier management aids new product launch. Quality Progress, 37(6), 49-63.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
7. Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Science, 41(9), 1471-1492.
8. Beth, S., Burt, D. N., & Copacino, W. (2003). Supply chain challenges: Building relationships. Harvard Business Review, 181(1), 64.
9. Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2002). Financial management: Theory and practice. New York: Thomson Learning, Inc.
10. Brownlie, D. T. (1987). The strategic management of technology: A new wave of market-led pragmatism or a return to product orientation? European Journal of Marketing, 21(9), 45-65.
11. Calabrese, G. (2002). Small-medium car suppliers and behavioural models in innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(2), 217-226.
12. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
13. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
14. Choi, T. Y., Budny, J., & Wank, N. (2004). Intellectual property management: A knowledge supply chain perspective. Business Horizons, 47(1), 37-44.
15. Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
16. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
17. Crowston, K. (1997). A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science, 8(2), 157-175.
18. Crowston, K., & Kammerer, E. E. (1998). Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems Journal, 37(2), 227-245.
19. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamic of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121.
20. D'Aveni, R. A., & Ravenscraft, D. J. (1994). Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance? Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1167-1206.
21. De Boer, M., Van de Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-418.
22. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
23. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O'Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716-737.
24. Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535.
25. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
26. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. (1999). Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 72-82.
27. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 27(10/11), 1105-1121.
28. Ellram, L. M., & Zsidisin, G. A. (2002). Factors that drive purchasing and supply management's use of information technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 269-281.
29. Ettlie, J. E. (1995). Product-process development integration in manufacturing. Management Science, 41(7), 1224-1237.
30. Ettlie, J. E. (1997). Integrated design and new product success. Journal of Operations Management, 15(1), 33-55.
31. Ettlie, J. E. (2000). Managing technological innovation. New York: Wiley.
32. Ettlie, J. E., & Perotti, V. (2002). The information processing view of innovation and NPD. Working paper, Technology Management Center, College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology.
33. Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 795-827.
34. Ettlie, J. E., & Sethuraman, K. (2002). Locus of supply and global manufacturing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(3), 349-370.
35. Ettlie, J. E., & Stoll, H. (1990). Managing the design-manufacturing process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Finkelstein, S. (1997). Inter-industry merger patterns and resource dependence: A replication and extension of Pfeffer (1972). Strategic Management Journal, 18(10), 787-810.
37. Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 109-122.
38. Handfield, R. B., Ragatz, G. B., Petersen, K. J., & Monczka, R. M. (1999). Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review, 42(1), 59-82.
39. Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
40. Helfat, C., & Raubitschek, R. (2000). Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10/11), 961-979.
41. Henderson, J. C., & Clark, H. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
42. Henderson, J., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 42(1), 63-84.
43. Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 22-42.
44. Hoovers. (2006). Multiple company searches, accessed March 13-17, 2006, [available at http://www.hoovers.com].
45. lansiti, M., & Clark, K. B. (1994). Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 557-605.
46. Jennings, D. (2002). Strategic sourcing: Benefits, problems and a contextual model. Management Decision, 40(1/2), 26-35.
47. Joglekar, N. R., Yassine, A. A., Eppinger, S. D., & Whitney, D. E. (2001). Performance of coupled product development activities with deadlines. Management Science, 47(12), 1605-1620.
48. Kimzey, C. H., & Kurokawa, S. (2002). Technology outsourcing in the U.S. and Japan. Research Technology Management, 45(4), 36-42.
49. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences, 56(1), 97-133.
50. Kuk, G. (2004). Effectiveness of vendor-managed inventory in the electronics industry: Determinants and outcomes. Information & Management, 41(5), 645-654.
51. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 111-125.
52. Lieberman, M. B., & Dhawan, R. (2005). Assessing the resource base of Japanese and U.S. auto producers: A stochastic frontier production function approach. Management Science, 51(7), 1060-1075.
53. Loch, C., & Terwiesch, C. (1998). Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Science, 44(8), 1032-1048.
54. McDermott, C., & Handfield, R. (2000). Concurrent development and strategic outsourcing: Do the rules change in breakthrough innovation? Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1), 35-57.
55. Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 1-18.
56. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Bellknap.
57. Nicholls-Nixon, C., & Woo, C. Y. (2003). Technology sourcing and output of established firms in aregime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24(1), 651-666.
58. O'Connor, G., & DeMartino, R. (in press). Organizing for radical innovation: An exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms. Journal of Product and Innovation Management, 23(4).
59. Oliver, N., & Delbridge, R. (2002). The characteristics of high performing supply chains. International Journal of Technology Management, 23(1), 60-73.
60. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. (2006). The nature and role of dynamic capabilities: Conceptualization and measurement. Working Paper, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Riverside.
61. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. (in press). From IT competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(2).
62. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 35-53.
63. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2005). Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 272-299.
64. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-542.
65. Roberts, E. B. (2001). Benchmarking global strategic management of technology. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 25-36.
66. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201.
67. Rubenstein, A. H. (1995). Industry-university romance? R&D Innovator, 4(7), 6-8.
68. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. S., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
69. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2000). Research commentary: The organizing logic of an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era-A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Information Systems Research, 11(2), 105-114.
70. Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm's trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362-373.
71. Schonfeld & Associates, Inc. (1998). Research and development growth trends: Inflation adjusted analysis of R&D spending. Riverwoods, IL: Author.
72. Schonfeld & Associates, Inc. (2002). R&D ratios and budgets. Evanston, IL: Author.
73. Shore, B. (2001). Information sharing in global supply chain systems. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 4(3), 27-50.
74. Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49.
75. Sobrero, M., & Roberts, E. B. (2001). The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Science, 47(4), 493-511.
76. Soderquist, K. E., Chanaron, J. J., & Birchall, D. (2001). Automotive components suppliers facing the learning challenge. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1(2/3), 252-268.
77. Swink, M. (2000). Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design integration and top management support. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(3), 208-220.
78. Swink, M. L., & Mabert, V. A. (2000). Product development partnerships: Balancing the needs of OEMs and suppliers. Business Horizons, 43(3), 59-68.
79. Tatikonda, M. V., & Stock, G. N. (2003). Product technology transfer in the upstream supply chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(6), 444-461.
80. Teece, D. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1), 39-63.
81. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
82. Terwiesch, C., Loch, C. H., & De Meyer, A. (2002). Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering. Organization Science, 13(4), 402-419.
83. The Economist. (2004). Survey: Driving change. Sept. 4, 572(8391), 15.
84. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 439-465.
85. Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132-142.
86. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
87. Wheeler, B. C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 125-146.
88. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
89. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
90. Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
91. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(2), 339-351.