A modelling approach to quantify dynamic crosstalk between the pheromone and the starvation pathway in baker's yeast

FEBS Journal

Volumn 273, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 3520-3533

  Schaber, Jörg ^a   Kofahl, Bente ^b   Kowald, Axel ^a   Klipp, Edda ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crossactivation; Crossinhibition; Filamentous growth pathway; Mathematical model; Mating

Indexed keywords

ENZYME STE11; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE KINASE; PHEROMONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL COMMUNICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HAPLOIDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN SECRETION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STARVATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHEROMONES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33746113018     PISSN: 1742464X     EISSN: 17424658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05359.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Schwartz MA & Baron V (1999) Interactions between mitogenic stimuli, or, a thousand and one connections. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11, 197-202.
2. Schwartz MA & Madhani HD (2004) Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 38, 725-748.
3. Cowan KJ & Storey KB (2003) Mitogen-activated protein kinases: new signaling pathways functioning in cellular responses to environmental stress. J Exp Biol 206, 1107-1115.
4. Papin JA & Palsson BO (2004) Topological analysis of mass-balanced signaling networks: a framework to obtain network properties including crosstalk. J Theor Biol 227, 283-297.
5. Binder B & Heinrich R (2004) Interrelations between dynamical properties and structural characteristics of signal transduction networks. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 15, 13-23.
6. Somsen OJ, Siderius M, Bauer FF, Snoep JL & Westerhoff HV (2002) Selectivity in overlapping MAP kinase cascades. J Theor Biol 218, 343-354.
7. Komarova NL, Zou X, Nie Q & Bardwell L (2005) A theoretical framework for specificity in cell signaling. Mol Syst Biol, doi:10.1038/msb4100031
8. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66, 300-372.
9. Gustin MC, Albertyn J, Alexander M & Davenport K (1998) MAP kinase pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 1264-1300.
10. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic adaptation in yeast - control of the yeast osmolyte system. Int Rev Cytol 215, 149-187.
11. Leeuw T, Wu C, Schrag JD, Whiteway M, Thomas DY & Leberer E (1998) Interaction of a G-protein beta-subunit with a conserved sequence in Ste20/PAK family protein kinases. Nature 391, 191-195.
12. Song J, Chen Z, Xu P, Gingras R, Ng A, Leberer E, Thomas DY & Ni F (2001) Molecular interactions of the Gbeta binding domain of the Ste20p/PAK family of protein kinases. An isolated but fully functional Gbeta binding domain from Ste20p is only partially folded as shown by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem 276, 41205-41212. Epub 2001 August 16.
13. Madhani HD & Fink GR (1998) The riddle of MAP kinase signaling specificity. Trends Genet 14, 151-155.
14. Dohlman HG & Thorner JW (2001) Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. Annu Rev Biochem 70, 703-754.
15. Olson KA, Nelson C, Tai G, Hung W, Yong C, Astell C & Sadowski I (2000) Two regulators of Ste12p inhibit pheromone-responsive transcription by separate mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 20, 4199-4209.
16. Tedford K, Kim S, Sa D, Stevens K & Tyers M (1997) Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates. Curr Biol 7, 228-238.
17. Bardwell L, Cook JG, Voora D, Baggott DM, Martinez AR & Thorner J (1998) Repression of yeast Ste12 transcription factor by direct binding of unphosphorylated Kss1 MAPK and its regulation by the Ste7 MEK. Genes Dev 12, 2887-2898.
18. Hung W, Olson KA, Breitkreutz A & Sadowski I (1997) Characterization of the basal and pheromone-stimulated phosphorylation states of Ste12p. Eur J Biochem 245, 241-251.
19. Kusari AB, Molina DM, Sabbagh W Jr, Lau CS & Bardwell L (2004) A conserved protein interaction network involving the yeast MAP kinases Fus3 and Kss1. J Cell Biol 164, 267-277.
20. Zeitlinger J, Simon I, Harbison CT, Hannett NM, Volkert TL, Fink GR & Young RA (2003) Program-specific distribution of a transcription factor dependent on partner transcription factor and MAPK signaling. Cell 113, 395-404.
21. Flatauer LJ, Zadeh SF & Bardwell L (2005) Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 25, 1793-1803.
22. Elion EA, Brill JA & Fink GR (1991) FUS3 represses CLN1 and CLN2 and in concert with KSS1 promotes signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 9392-9396.
23. Cherkasova V, Lyons DM & Elion EA (1999) Fus3p and Kss1p control G1 arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a balance of distinct arrest and proliferative functions that operate in parallel with Far1p. Genetics 151, 989-1004.
24. Ma D, Cook JG & Thorner J (1995) Phosphorylation and localization of Kss1, a MAP kinase of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway. Mol Biol Cell 6, 889-909.
25. Sabbagh W Jr, Flatauer LJ, Bardwell AJ & Bardwell L (2001) Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. Mol Cell 8, 683-691.
26. Breitkreutz A, Boucher L & Tyers M (2001) MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation. Curr Biol 11, 1266-1271.
27. Maleri S, Ge Q, Hackett EA, Wang Y, Dohlman HG & Errede B (2004) Persistent activation by constitutive Ste7 promotes Kss1-mediated invasive growth but fails to support Fus3-dependent mating in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24, 9221-9238.
28. Esch RK & Errede B (2002) Pheromone induction promotes Ste11 degradation through a MAPK feedback and ubiquitin-dependent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 9160-9165. Epub 2002 June 20.
29. van Drogen F & Peter M (2001) MAP kinase dynamics in yeast. Biol Cell 93, 63-70.
30. Brückner S, Köhler T, Braus GH, Heise B, Bolte M & Mösch HU (2004) Differential regulation of Tec1 by Fus3 and Kss1 confers signaling specificity in yeast development. Curr Genet 46, 331-342.
31. Bao MZ, Schwartz MA, Cantin GT, Yates JR III & Madhani HD (2004) Pheromone-dependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell 119, 991-1000.
32. Chou S, Huang L & Liu H (2004) Fus3-regulated Tec1 degradation through SCFCdc4 determines MAPK signaling specificity during mating in yeast. Cell 119, 981-990.
33. Kofahl B & Klipp E (2004) Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway. Yeast 21, 831-850.
34. Klipp E, Nordlander B, Kruger R, Gennemark P & Hohmann S (2005) Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat Biotechnol 23, 975-982.
35. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, Howson RW, Belle A, Dephoure N, O'Shea EK & Weissman JS (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741.
36. O'Rourke SM & Herskowitz I (1998) The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 12, 2874-2886.
37. Roberts CJ, Nelson B, Marton MJ, Stoughton R, Meyer MR, Bennett HA, He YD, Dai H, Walker WL, Hughes TR, Tyers M, Boone C & Friend SH (2000) Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 287, 873-880.
38. Heinrich R, Neel BG & Rapoport TA (2002) Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. Mol Cell 9, 957-970.
39. McEwen CR, Stallard RW & Juhos ET (1968) Separation of Biological Particles by Centrifugal Elutriation. Anal Biochem 23, 369-377.