|
|
Volumn 104, Issue 2 ( Pt 1), 1996, Pages 132-137
|
|
Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;
ALUMINUM SILICATE;
AQUA IONOFIL;
BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE;
CEMENT;
COMPOMER;
COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN;
DENTAL ALLOY;
DYRACT;
GLASS IONOMER;
KETAC FIL;
KETAC-FIL;
MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
PERTAC HYBRID;
PHOTAC FIL;
PHOTAC-FIL;
POLYURETHAN;
RESIN;
SILICATE;
VALIANT PHD;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER GRAPHICS;
DENTAL SURGERY;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MATERIALS TESTING;
NONPARAMETRIC TEST;
UNICAP;
ACRYLIC RESINS;
ALUMINUM SILICATES;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE;
CERMET CEMENTS;
COMPOMERS;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
COMPUTER GRAPHICS;
DENTAL ALLOYS;
DENTAL AMALGAM;
DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR;
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS;
MALEATES;
MATERIALS TESTING;
METHACRYLATES;
POLYURETHANES;
RESINS, SYNTHETIC;
SILICATES;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
|
|
EID: 0030119030
PISSN: 09098836
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00057.x Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (47)
|
|
References (0)
|
