Determination of changes on tooth-colored cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 233-238

  Folwaczny, Matthias ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a   Kunzelmann, Karl Heinz ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cervical; Glass ionomer; Modified; Polyacid; Resin; Wear

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOTAC FIL; PHOTAC-FIL; RESIN; SILICATE; TETRIC;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; LASER; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICATES; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EROSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034202667     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003233.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. MATIS BA, COCHRAN M, CARLSON T. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: Results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 373-382.
2. NEO J, CHEW CL, YAP A, SIDHU S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 15-18.
3. BRACKETT WW, BROWNING WD, ROSS JA, GREGORY PN, OWENS BM. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 119-122.
4. SIDHU SK. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 553-559.
5. PELKA M, EBERT J, SCHNEIDER H, KRMER N, PETSCHELT A. Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 132-137.
6. DUKE ES, LINDEMUTH JS. Polymeric adhesion of dentin: contrasting substrates. Am J Dent 1990; 3: 264-270.
7. DUKE ES, LINDEMUTH JS. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 241-246.
8. TRIANA R, PRADO C, GARRO J, GARCIA-GODOY F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 252-254.
9. UNO S, FINGER WJ, FRITZ U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 64-69.
10. FRITZ UB, FINGER WJ, UNO S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 161-166.
11. DE GEE AJ, VAN DUINEN RNB, WERNER A, DAVIDSON CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1613-1619.
12. TYAS MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998; 23: 77-80.
13. ABDALLA AI, ALHADAINY HA, GARCIA-GODOY F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 18-20.
14. ATTIN T, VATASCHKI M, HELLWIG E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 203-209.
15. MEHL A, GLOGER W, KUNZELMANN KH, HICKEL R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1799-1807.
16. RYGE G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
17. RYGE G, JENDRESEN MD, GLANTZ PO, MJŌR I. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 1981; 5: 235-239.
18. TAYLOR DF, BAYNE SC, STURDEVANT JR, WILDER AD. Correlation of M-L, Leinfelder, and USPHS clinical evaluation techniques for wear. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 151-153.
19. HEWLETT ER, ORRO ME, CLARK GT. Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 49-53.
20. PRICE RB, GERROW JD, SUTOW EJ, MAC SWEEN R. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations. Int J Prosthdont 1991; 4: 169-174.
21. GLADYS S, VAN MEERBEEK B, BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 883-894.
22. DE GEE AJ, PALLAV P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 1994; 22 (Suppl 1): 21-27.
23. COOK WD. Degradative analysis of glass ionomer polyelectrolyte cements. Biomed Mater Res 1983; 17: 1015-1027.
24. WILSON AD, CRISP S, PADDON JM. The hydration of a glass-ionomer (ASPA) cement. B Polym J 1981; 13: 66-73.
25. SOLTÉSZ U, LEUPOLZ M. Hrte- und Festigkeitsverhalten von Glasionomer-zementen. Dtsch Zahnrztl Z 1993; 48: 237-241.
26. PALLAV P, DE GEE AJ, WERNER A, DAVIDSON CL. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 56-61.
27. ATTIN T, BUCHALLA W, KIELBASSA AJ, HELLWIG E. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 359-362.
28. BARTLETT DW, BLUNT L, SMITH BGN. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 179-184.
29. GRIPPO JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esth Dent 1991; 3: 14-19.
30. LEVITCH LC, BADER JD, SHUGARS DA, HEYMAN HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994; 22: 195-207.