Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 9, Issue , 2006, Pages 83-110

  Layman, Geoffrey C ^a   Carsey, Thomas M ^b   Horowitz, Juliana Menasce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Democratic Party; Party polarization; Political change; Political issues; Republican Party

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745772000     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Abramowitz AI. 1994. Issue evolution reconsidered: racial attitudes and partisanship in the U.S. electorate. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 38:1-24
2. Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL. 1998. Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. J. Polit. 60:634-52
3. Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL. 2002. Ideological realignment and U.S. congressional elections. In Understanding Public Opinion, ed. B Norrander, C Wilcox, pp. 203-16. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 2nd ed.
4. Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL. 2005. Why can't we all just get along? The reality of a polarized America. The Forum 3 (issue 2, article 1). http://www.bepress.com/forum
5. Adams GD. 1997. Abortion: evidence of issue evolution. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 41:718-37
6. Aldrich JH. 1983a. A Downsian spatial model with party activism. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 77:974-90
7. Aldrich JH. 1983b. A spatial model with party activists: implications for electoral dynamics. Pub. Choice 41:63-100
8. Aldrich JH. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
9. Aldrich JH, Rohde DW. 1997. The transition to Republican rule in the House: implications for theories of congressional politics. Polit. Sci. Q. 112:541-67
10. Aldrich JH, Rohde DW. 2000a. The consequences of party organization in the House: the role of the majority and minority parties in conditional party government. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 31-72
11. Aldrich JH, Rohde DW. 2000b. The Republican revolution and the House appropriations committee. J. Polit. 62:1-33
12. Aldrich JH, Rohde DW. 2001. The logic of conditional party government: revisiting the electoral connection. In Congress Reconsidered, ed. LC Dodd, BI Oppenheimer, pp. 269-92. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 7th ed.
13. Aldrich JH, Rohde DW. 2005. Congressional committees in a partisan era. See Dodd & Oppenheimer 2005, pp. 249-70
14. Aldrich JH, Sullivan JL, Borgida E. 1989. Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates waltz before a blind audience? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83:123-41
15. American Political Science Association. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association. New York: Rinehart
16. Andersen K. 1979. The Creation of a Democratic Majority, 1928-1936. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
17. Aranson P, Ordeshook P. 1972. Spatial strategies for sequential elections. In Probability Models of Collective Decision Making, ed. R Niemi, H Weisberg, pp. 298-331. Columbus, OH: Merrill
18. Baker W. 2005. America's Crisis of Values: Reality and Perception. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
19. Bartels LM. 2000. Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44:35-50
20. Beck PA. 1979. The electoral cycle and patterns of American politics. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 9:129-56
21. Binder SA. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
22. Binder SA, Smith SS. 1997. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
23. Black E, Black M. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
24. Bond JR, Fleisher R, eds. 2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press
25. Brady DW. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
26. Brewer MD. 2005. The rise of partisanship and the expansion of partisan conflict within the American electorate. Polit. Res. Q. 58:219-30
27. Brock WE. 2004. A recipe for incivility. Washington Post, June 27:B7
28. Bryce J. 1995 (1910). The American Commonwealth. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
29. Burden BC. 2001. The polarizing effects of congressional primaries. In Congressional Primaries and the Politics of Representation, ed. PF Galderisi, M Ezra, M Lyons, pp. 95-115. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
30. Campbell A, Converse PE, Miller WE, Stokes DE. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
31. Carmines EG. 1991. The logic of party alignments. J. Theor. Polit. 3:65-80
32. Carmines EG, Layman GC. 1997. Issue evolution in postwar American politics: old certainties and fresh tensions. In Present Discontents: American Politics in the Very Late Twentieth Century, ed. BE Shafer, pp. 89-134. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House
33. Carmines EG, Layman GC. 1998. When prejudice matters: the impact of racial stereotypes on the racial policy preferences of Democrats and Republicans. In Prejudice and Politics, ed. J Hurwitz, M Peffley, pp. 100-34. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
34. Carmines EG, Stanley HW. 1990. Ideological realignment in the contemporary South: Where have all the conservatives gone? In The Disappearing South? Studies in Regional Change and Continuity, ed. RP Steed, LW Moreland, TA Baker, pp. 21-33: Tuscaloosa, AL: Univ. Alabama Press
35. Carmines EG, Stanley HW. 1992. The transformation of the New Deal party system: social groups, political ideology, and changing partisanship among northern whites, 1972-1988. Polit. Behav. 14:213-37
36. Carmines EG, Stimson JA. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ, Press
37. Carsey TM, Layman GC. 2006. Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. Am. J. Polit. Sci. In press
38. Carson JL, Crespin MH, Finocchiaro CJ, Rohde DW. 2003. Unkinl congressional districts across time: redistricting and party polarization in Congress. Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
39. Chappell HW, Keech WR. 1986. Policy motivation and party differences in a dynamic spatial model of party competition. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80:881-900
40. Clubb JM, Flanigan WH, Zingale NH. 1990. Partisan Realignment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 2nd ed.
41. Cohen JE, Fleisher R, Kantor P. 2001. America. Political Parties: Decline or Resurgence? Washington, DC: CQ Press
42. Converse PE. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. DE Apter, pp. 206-61. New York: Free
43. Converse PE, Markus GB. 1979. Plus ca change...the new CPS election study panel. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 73:32-49
44. Cooper J, Brady DW. 1981. Institutional context and leadership style: the House from Cannon to Rayburn. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 75:411-25
45. Cox GW, McCubbins MD. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
46. Crotty W. 2001. Policy coherence in political parties: the elections of 1984, 1988, and 1992. See Cohen et al. 2001, pp. 122-37
47. Davis NJ, Robinson RV. 1996. Are the rumors of war exaggerated? Religious orthodoxy and moral progressivism in America. Am. J. Social. 102:756-87
48. Davis OA, Hinich M, Ordeshook P. 1970. An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 64:426-48
49. DiMaggio P, Evans J, Bryson B. 1996. Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized? Am. J. Social. 102:690-755
50. Dionne EJ. 1991. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Touchstone
51. Distlear C, Baum L. 2001. Selection of law clerks and polarization in the U.S. Supreme Court. J. Polit. 63:869-85
52. Dodd LC, Oppenheimer BI, eds. 2005. Congress Reconsidered. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 8th ed.
53. Downs A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row
54. Edwards GC, Barrett A. 2000. Presidential agenda setting in Congress. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 109-33
55. Enelow JM, Hinich MJ, ed. 1990. Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
56. Erikson RS, Tedin KL. 1981. The 1928-1936 partisan realignment: the case for the conversion hypothesis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 75:951-62
57. Evans JH, Nunn LM. 2005. The deeper "culture wars" questions. The Forum 3 (issue 2, article 3). http://www.bepress.com/forum
58. Fenno RF. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. New York: Longman
59. Fiorina MP. 1996. Divided Government. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 2nd ed.
60. Fiorina MP. 1999. Whatever happened to the median voter? Presented at MIT Conf. Parties Congr., Cambridge, MA
61. Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ, Pope JC. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman
62. Fleisher R, Bond JR. 2000a. Congress and the president in a partisan era. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 1-8
63. Fleisher R, Bond JR. 2000b. Partisanship and the president's quest for votes on the floor of Congress. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 154-85
64. Fleisher R, Bond JR. 2001. Evidence of increasing polarization among ordinary citizens. See Cohen et al. 2001, pp. 55-77
65. Fleisher R, Bond JR. 2004. The shrinking middle in the U.S. Congress. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 34:429-51
66. Frank T. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas ? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan
67. Geer JG. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads and Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
68. Gerring J. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828-1996. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
69. Gimpel JG. 1999. Separate Destinations: Migration, Immigration, and the Politics of Places. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
70. Gimpel JG, Schuknecht JE. 2001. Interstate migration and electoral politics. J. Polit. 63:207-31
71. Green D, Palmquist B, Schickler E. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
72. Green JC, Guth JL, Smidt CE, Kellstedt LA. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
73. Green JC, Herrnson PS, eds. 2002. Responsible Partisanship? Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas
74. Hetherington MJ. 2001. Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95:619-31
75. Hinich MJ, Munger MC. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
76. Hood MV, Kidd Q, Morris IL. 1999. Of Byrd[s] and Bumpers: using Democratic senators to analyze political change in the South, 1960-1995. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 43:465-87
77. Huckfeldt R, Kohfeld CW. 1989. Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
78. Hunter JD. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books
79. Jacobson GC. 2000. Party polarization in national politics: the electoral connection. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 9-30
80. Jacobson GC. 2005. Polarized politics and the 2004 congressional and presidential elections. Polit. Sci. Q. 120:199-218
81. Jackson RA. Carsey TM. 2006. Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election. Elect. Stud. In press
82. Jamieson KH, Falk E. 2000. Continuity and change in civility in the House. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 96-108
83. Jelen TG. 1997. Religion and public opinion in the 1990s: an empirical overview. In Understanding Public Opinion, ed. B Norrander, C Wilcox, pp. 55-68. Washington, DC: CQ Press
84. Jones DR. 2001. Party polarization and legislative gridlock. Polit. Res. Q. 54:125-41
85. Kaufmann KM, Petrocik JR. 1999. The changing politics of American men: understanding the sources of the gender gap. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 43:864-87
86. King DC. 1997. The polarization of American parties and mistrust of government. In Why People Don't Trust Government, ed. JS Nye, PD Zelikow, DC King, pp. 155-78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
87. King DC. 2003. Congress, polarization, and fidelity to the median voter. Work. Pap., John F. Kennedy Sch. Gov., Harvard Univ.
88. Kirkpatrick JJ. 1976. The New Presidential Elite. New York: Sage
89. Kohut A, Green JC, Keeter S, Toth RC. 2000. The Diminishing Divide: Religion's Changing Role in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
90. Krehbiel K. 1993. Where's the party? Br. J. Polit. Sci. 23:235-66
91. Krehbiel K. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
92. Krosnick JA. 1990. Government policy and citizen passion: a study of issue publics in contemporary American politics. Polit. Behav. 12:59-92
93. Krugman P. 2002. America the polarized. New York Times, Jan. 4:A21
94. Layman GC. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
95. Layman GC, Carsey TM. 1998. Why do party activists convert? An analysis of individuallevel change on the abortion issue. Polit. Res. Q.51:723-50
96. Layman GC, Carsey TM. 2002a. Party polarization and "conflict extension" in the American electorate. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:786-802
97. Layman GC, Carsey TM. 2002b. Party polarization and party structuring of policy attitudes: a comparison of three NES panel studies. Polit. Behav. 24:199-236
98. Layman GC, Carsey TM, Green JC, Herrera R. 2005. Party polarization and "conflict extension" in the United States: the case of party activists. Presented at Annu. Meet. South. Polit. Sci, Assoc., New Orleans
99. Layman GC, Green JC. 2003. The puzzle of polarization: American religion, political behavior, and policy attitudes since 1964. Presented at Univ. Notre Dame Relig. Polit. 2003 Conf., South Bend, IN
100. Layman GC, Green JC. 2006. Wars and rumors of wars: the contexts of cultural conflict in American political behavior. Br. J. Polit. Sci. In press
101. Lee FE. 2005. Untangling the sources of congressional partisanship: ideology, interests, and opportunism. Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
102. Leege DC, Wald KD, Krueger BS, Mueller PD. 2002. The Politics of Cultural Differences: Social Change and Voter Mobilization Strategies in the Post-New Deal Period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
103. Levine J, Carmines EG, Huckfeldt R. 1997. The rise of ideology in the post-New Deal party system, 1972-1992. Am. Polit. Q. 25:19-34
104. Lindaman K, Haider-Markel DP. 2002. Issue evolution, political parties, and the culture vais. Polit. Res. Q. 55:91-110
105. McCarty N, Poole KT, Rosenthal H. 1997. The Realignment of National Politics and Income Distribution. Washington, DC: AEI Press
106. Miller G, Schofield N. 2003. Activists and partisan realignment in the United States. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97:245-60
107. Miller WE, Jennings MK. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Sage
108. Oppenheimer BI. 2005. Deep red and blue congressional districts: the causes and consequences of declining party competitiveness. See Dodd & Oppenheimer 2005, pp. 135-58
109. Petrocik JR. 1974. An analysis of the intransitivities in the index of party identification. Polit. Methodol. 1:13-47
110. Polsby NW. 2005. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
111. Pomper GM. 2003. Parliamentary government in the United States: a new regime for a new century? In The State of the Parties, ed. JC Green, R Farmer, pp. 267-86. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 4th ed.
112. Pomper GM, Weiner MD. 2002. Toward a more responsible two-party voter: the evolving bases of partisanship. See Green & Herrnson 2002, pp. 181-200
113. Poole KT, Rosenthal H. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
114. Poole KT, Rosenthal H. 2001. D-NOMINATE after 10 years. Legis. Stud. Q. 26:5-29
115. Putz DW. 2002. Partisan conversion in the 1990s: ideological realignment meets measurement theory. J. Polit. 64:1199-1209
116. Rabinowitz G, MacDonald SE. 1989. A directional theory of issue voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83:93-122
117. Ranney A. 1972. Turnout and representation in presidential primary elections. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 66:21-37
118. Riker WH. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: Freeman
119. Roberts JM, Smith SS. 2003. Procedural contexts, party strategy, and conditional party voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971-2000. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 47:305-17
120. Rohde DW. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
121. Rundquist BS, Carsey TM, 2002. Congress and Defense Spending: The Distributive Politics of Military Procurement. Norman: Univ. Oklahoma Press
122. Saunders KL, Abramowitz AI. 2004. Ideological realignment and active partisans in the American electorate. Aw. Polit. Res. 32:285-309
123. Schattschneider EE. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden
124. Shafer BE, Claggett WJM. 1995. The Two Majorities: The Issue Context of Modern American Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
125. Shafer BE. 2003. The Two Majorities and the Puzzle of Modern American Politics. Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas
126. Shea DM. 2003. Schattschneider's dismay: strong parties and alienated voters. In The State of the Parties, ed. JC Green, R Farmer, pp. 287-99. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 4th ed.
127. Sinclair B. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
128. Sinclair B. 1997. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press
129. Sinclair B. 2000. Hostile partners: the President, Congress, and lawmaking in the partisan 1990s. See Bond & Fleisher 2000, pp. 134-53
130. Sinclair B. 2002. The dream fulfilled? Party development in Congress, 1950-2000. See Green & Herrnson 2002, pp. 181-200
131. Smith SS, Gamm G. 2005. The dynamics of party government in Congress. See Dodd & Oppenheimer 2005, pp. 181-206
132. Snyder, JM, Groseclose, T. 2000. Estimating party influence in congressional roll-call voting. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44:187-205
133. Soule JW, Clarke JW. 1970. Amateurs and professionals: a study of delegates to the 1968 Democratic national convention. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 64:888-98
134. Stonecash JM, Brewer MD, Mariani MD. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview
135. Stonecash JM, Mariani MD. 2000. Republican gains in the House in the 1994 elections: class polarization in American politics. Polit. Sci. Q. 115:93-113
136. Sundquist JL. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
137. Theriault SM. 2003. The case of the vanishing moderates: party polarization in the modern Congress. Work. Pap., Dep. Gov., Univ. Texas
138. Tocqueville A. 1966 (1835). Democracy in America. New York: Harper & Row
139. Uslaner EM, 1993. The Decline of Comity in Congress. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
140. Uslaner EM. 2000. Is the Senate more civil than the House? In Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the Senate, ed. B Loomis, pp. 32-56. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
141. Von Drehle D. 2004. Political split is pervasive. Washington Post, Apr. 25:A1
142. Washington Post. 2004. A polarized nation? Nov. 14:B6
143. Weisberg HF. 2002. The party in the electorate as a basis for more responsible parties. See Green & Herrnson 2002, pp. 161-80
144. Wildavsky A. 1965. The Goldwater phenomenon: purists, politicians, and the two-party system. Rev. Polit. 27:393-99
145. Will GF. 2004. America's shifting reality. Washington Post, Nov. 4:A25
146. Williams RH, ed. 1997. Cultural Wars in American Politics: Critical Reviews of a Popular Myth. New York: De Gruyter
147. Wilson JQ. 1962. The Amateur Democrat. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
148. Wuthnow R. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
149. Wuthnow R. 1989. The Struggle for America's Soul: Evangelicals, Liberals, and Secularism. Grand Rapids, Ml: Eerdmans
150. Zaller J. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press