Party polarization and legislative gridlock

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 125-141

  Jones, David R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035587394     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290105400107     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Binder, Sarah. 1999. "The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-1996." American Political Science Review 93: 519-36.
2. Brady, David, and Craig Volden. 1998. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Cameron, Charles, William Howell, Scott Adler, and Charles Riemann. 1997. "Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-1994." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
4. Coleman, John J. 1999. "Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness." American Political Science Review 93: 821-35.
5. Cutler, Lloyd N. 1988. "Some Reflections About Divided Government." Presidential Studies Quarterly 17: 485-92.
6. Edwards, George C. III, Andrew Barrett, and Jeffrey Peake. 1997. "The Legislative Impact of Divided Government." American Journal of Political Science 41: 545-63.
7. Fleisher, Richard, and Jon R. Bond. 2000. "Partisanship and the President's Quest for Votes on the Floor of Congress." In Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, eds., Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press
8. Hagle, Timothy M., and Glenn E. Mitchell II. 1992. "Goodness of Fit Measures for Probit and Logit." American Journal of Political Science 36: 762-84.
9. Jones, David R. 1995. "Explaining Policy Stability in the United States: Divided Government or Partisanship in the House?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
10. _. 1998. "Parties and the Volume of Law Production, 1947-1994." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
11. Kelly, Sean Q. 1993. "Divided We Govern? A Reassessment." Polity 25 :473-84.
12. Kernell, Samuel. 1991. "Facing an Opposition Congress: The President's Strategic Circumstance." In Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell, eds., The Politics of Divided Government, pp. 97-112. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
13. King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior From Aggregate Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.
15. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern. New Haven: Yale University Press.
17. Poole, Keith T. and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Sinclair, Barbara. 1997. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
19. Sundquist, James L. 1988. "Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States." Political Science Quarterly 103: 614-24.
20. _. 1992. Constitutional Reform and Effective Government, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21. Taylor, Andrew J. 1998. "Explaining Government Productivity." American Politics Quarterly 26: 439-58.