A longitudinal analysis of information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries

Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 289-313

  Julien, Heidi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745675490     PISSN: 1195096X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). 2000. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago: ACRL. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm.
2. _. 2003a. Characteristics of programs of information literacy that illustrate best practices: A guideline. Chicago: ACRL. http://www.ala.org/ala/ acrl/acrlstandards/ characteristics.htm.
3. _. 2003b. National information literacy survey. Chicago: ACRL. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlissues/acrlinfolit/professactivity/ infolitsurvey/surveyintro.htm.
4. _. 2005a. Information literacy, http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlissues/ acrlinfolit/infolitoverview/introtoinfolit/introinfolit.htm.
5. _. 2005b. Research agenda for library instruction and information literacy, http://www.ala.org/ala/acrlbucket/is/iscommittees/webpages/research/ researchagendalibrary.htm.
6. Auster, Ethel, and Shauna Taylor. 2004. Downsizing in academic libraries: The Canadian experience. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7. Bridgland, Angela, and Martha Whitehead. 2005. Information literacy in the "E" environment: An approach for sustainability. Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(1): 54-59.
8. Educational Testing Service. 2003. Succeeding in the 21st century: What higher education must do to address the gap in information and communication technology proficiencies. http://www.ets.org/ictliteracy/ICTwhitepaperfinal.pdf.
9. Given, Lisa, and Heidi Julien. 2005. Finding common ground: An analysis of librarians' expressed attitudes towards teaching faculty. Reference Librarian 43(89/90): 25-38.
10. Hisle, W. Lee. 2002. Top issues facing academic libraries. College and Research libraries News 63(10). www.ala.org/acrl/hislenov02.html.
11. Julien, Heidi. 2000. Information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries: Longitudinal trends and international comparisons. College and Research Libraries 61 (6): 510-23.
12. Julien, Heidi, and Sandra Anderson. 2003. The public library in "Connecting Canadians." Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 27(4): 5-29.
13. Julien, Heidi, and Stuart Boon. 2002. From the front line: Information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries. Reference Services Review 30(2): 143-49.
14. _. 2004. Assessing instructional outcomes in Canadian academic libraries. Library and Information Science Research, 26(2): 121-39.
15. Julien, Heidi, and Reegan Breu. 2005. Instructional practices in Canadian public libraries, Library and Information Science Research 27(3): 281-301.
16. Julien, Heidi, and Lisa Given. 2003. Faculty-librarian relationships in the information literacy context: A content analysis of librarians' expressed attitudes and experiences. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 27(3): 65-87.
17. Julien, Heidi, and Gloria J. Leckie. 1997. Bibliographic instruction trends in Canadian academic libraries. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 22(2): 1-15.
18. Leckie, Gloria, and Anne Fullerton. 1999. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College and Research Libraries 61(1): 9-29.
19. Rader, Hannelore B. 2002a. Information literacy: An emerging global priority. White paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, Czech Republic, http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/rader- fullpaper.pdf.
20. _. 2002b. Information literacy 1973-2002: A selected literature review. Library Trends 51(2): 242-59.
21. Shirato, Linda, and Joseph Badics. 1997. Library instruction in the 1990s: A comparison with trends in two earlier LOEX surveys. Research Strategies 15(4): 223-37.
22. Sontag, Gabriela. 2001. Report on the national information literacy survey: Documenting progress throughout the United States. College and Research Libraries News 62(10): 996-1001.
23. Tillotson, Joy. 2002. A portrait of the audience for instruction in Web searching: Results of a survey conducted at two Canadian universities. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 27(1): 3-28.
24. Virkus, Sirje. 2003. Information literacy in Europe: A literature review. Information Research 8(4). http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paperl59.html.
25. Whitehead, Martha J., and Catherine A. Quinlan. 2002. Canada: An information literacy case study. White paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, Czech Republic, http:// www.nclis.gov/libinter/ infolitconf&meet/papers/quinlan-fullpaper.pdf.