Dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children: Perceived utility in Australian occupational therapy practice

Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 337-349

  Rodger, Sylvia ^a   Daley, Emma ^a   Hughes, Kate ^a   Ziviani, Jenny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Children; Cognition; Culture; Dynamic assessment; Mediation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; LANGUAGE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE; PEDIATRICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; THINKING; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 33745205516     PISSN: 00450766     EISSN: 14401630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00516.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ayres, A. J. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
2. Bates-Ames, L., Gillespie, C., Haines, A. B & Ilg, F. (1980). Gesell preschool test. Rosemont, NJ: Gesell Institute of Human Development, Programs for Education, Inc.
3. Beery,, K. (1997). Beery-Buktenica developmental test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) (4th ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Modern Curriculum Press.
4. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. & Johnson, S. (1997). Test of nonverbal intellegence-3. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
5. Bruininks, R. H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
6. Campione, J. C. & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In: C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82 -115). New York: Guilford.
7. Case-Smith, J., Allen, A. S. & Pratt, P. N. (1996). Occupational therapy for children (3rd ed.). St Louis, MI: Mosby.
8. Cermak S. A., Katz, N., McGuire, E., Greebaum, S., Peralta, C. & Maser-Flanagan, V. (1995). Performance of Americans and Israelis with cerebrovascular accident on the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 500-506.
9. Chapparo, C. & Ranka, J. (1997). Occupational Performance Model Australia. Monograph 1. Retrieved 1 February, 2005, from http://www.occupationalperformance.com
10. Chow, S. M. K., Henderson, S. E. & Barnett, A. L. (2001). The movement assessment battery for children: A comparison of 4-year-old to 6-year-old children from Hong Kong and the United States. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 55-61.
11. Colarusso, R. & Hammill, D. (1995). Motor-Free Visual Perception Test - Revised. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
12. Coster, W., Deeney, T., Haltiwanger, J. & Haley, S. (1998). School function assessment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
13. Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Dunn, W. (1999). Sensory profile. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
15. Dunn, W. (2000). Best practice occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
16. Education Queensland. (2003). The role of occupational therapists and physiotherapists in schools. Retrieved 31 October, 2003, from http://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/learning/students/disabilities/ staff/otptrole.doc.
17. Gardener, M. (1997). Test of visual-perceptual skills (non-motor) - Revised. Hydesville, CA: Psychological and Educational Publications Inc.
18. Grbich, C. (1999). Techniques of data collection. In: C. Grbich (Ed.), Qualitative research in health (pp. 81 -119). St Leonards, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
19. Gutierrez-Clellen, V. & Pena, E. (2001). Dynamic assessment of diverse children: A tutorial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 212-222.
20. Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Ludlow, L. H., Haltiwanger, J. T. & Andrellos, P. J. (1992). Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
21. Hammill, D., Pearson, N. A. & Voress, K. J. (1998). Developmental Test of Visual Perception (DTVP-2). Austin, TX: ProED.
22. Itzkovich, M., Elazar, B. & Averbuch, S. (1990). Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) manual. Jerusalem, Israel: Occupational Therapy Department, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital.
23. Kahn, R. J. & King, S. R. (1997). Dynamic procedures for assessing children's cognitive and emotional strengths and needs. Journal of Cognitive Education, 6, 101-114.
24. Katz, N., Kizony, R. & Parush, S. (2002). Visuomotor organisation and thinking operations performance of school-age Ethiopian, Bedouin, and mainstream Israeli children. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22, 34-43.
25. Katz, N., Parush, S. & Bar-Ilan, T. (2005). Dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children (DOTCA-Ch). Pequannock, NJ: Maddak Inc.
26. Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with undeserved gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 140-147.
27. Kozulin, A. & Falik, L. (1995). Dynamic cognitive assessment of the child. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 192-196.
28. Kramer, P. & Hinojosa, J. (1999). Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
29. Krefting, L. (1991). Rigour in qualitative research: The assessment of trust worthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214-222.
30. Lidz, C. S. (2001). Multicultural issues and dynamic assessment. In: L. A. Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto & P. J. Meller (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (3rd ed., pp. 523 -540). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Luchlan, F. & Elliott, J. (2001). The psychological assessment of learning potential. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 647-657.
32. Miller, L. (1988). Miller assessment for preschoolers: Manual. Sidcup: The Pscyhological Corporation.
33. Missiuna, C., Malloy-Miller, T. & Mandich, A. (1997). Cognitive, or 'top-down', approaches to intervention. Keeping Current, 97 (1). Retrieved 8 November, 2002, from http://canchild.interlynx.net/kc/ KC1997-1.html.
34. Newborg, J., Stock. J. R. & Wnek, L. (1984). Battelle developmental inventory. Boston, MA: Houghton and Mifflin.
35. Parush, S., Sharoni, C., Hahn Markowitz, J. & Katz, N. (2000). Perceptual, motor and cognitive performance components of Bedouin children Israel. Occupational Therapy International, 7, 213-216.
36. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Polatajko, H. J., Mandich, A. & Martini, R. (2000). Dynamic performance analysis: A framework for understanding occupational performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 65-72.
38. Polatajko, H. J., Mandich, A. D., Miller, L. T. & Macnab, J. J. (2001a). Cognitive intervention to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): Part II - the evidence. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20, 83-106.
39. Polatajko, H. J., Mandich, A. D., Missiuna, C., Miller, L. T., Macnab, J. J., Malloy-Miller, T. et al. (2001b). Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): Part III - The protocol in brief. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20, 107-123.
40. Polgar, S. & Thomas, S. A. (1995). Introduction to research in the health sciences (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Victoria: Churchill Livingstone.
41. Rodger, S., Brown, T. & Brown, A. (2005). Profile of of paediatric occupational therapy in Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00487.x.
42. Roid, G. & Miller, N. (1997). Leiter international performance scale - Revised. Chicago: Stoelting.
43. Rosenblum, H. R., Katz, N., Hahn-Markowitz, J. & Parush, S. (2000). Environmental influences on perceptual and motor skills of Ethiopian immigrant children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 587-594.
44. Salvia, J. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2004). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45. Schneider, E., Parush, S., Katz, N. & Miller, L. J. (1995). Performance of Israeli versus U.S. preschool children on the Miller Assessment for Preschoolers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 19-23.
46. Shapira, Y. & Harel, S. (1983). Standardisation of the Denver Developmental Screening Test for Israeli children. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, 19, 246-251.
47. Trombly, C. (1993). Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 253-257.
48. Ukrainetz, T., Harpell, S., Walsh, C. & Coyle, C. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with native American kindergartners. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 359-380.
49. Kozulin A. & Falik L. (1995). Dynamic cognitive assessment of the child. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 192-196.
50. Wallen, M. & Mackay, S. (1999). Test-restest, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability, and construct validity of the Handwriting Speed Test in year 3 and year 6 students. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 19, 29-42.
51. Webster, R. E. (1992). Learning Efficiency Test (LET II). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
52. Weinstock-Zlotnick, G. & Hinojosa, J. (2004). Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: Is one better than the other? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 594-599.
53. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
54. Ziviani, J., Rodger, S., Pacheco, P., Rootsey, L., Smith, A. & Katz, N. (2004). The Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children (DOTCA Ch): Pilot study of inter-rater and test retest reliability. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 17-25.