Supporting change and scholarship through review of online resources in professional development settings

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 957-974

  Ravitz, Jason ^a,c   Hoadley, Christopher ^b  

^a Buck Institute for Education   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION CYCLE; ONLINE RESOURCES; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT;

DIFFUSION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745197505     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00567.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allert, H. Richter, C. & Nejdl, W. (2004). Lifelong learning and second-order learning objects.British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 6, 701-715.
2. Bannan-Ritland, B., Dabbagh, N. & Murphy, K. (2000). Learning object systems as construc-tivist learning environments: related assumptions, theories, and applications. In D. A. Wiley(Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved 21 September, 2005, from http://reusabilily.org/read/ chapters/bannan-ritland.doc
3. Barab, S. & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S.Land (Eds), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 2 5-56). Mahway, NJ: LawrenceEarlbuam Associates.
4. Barbera, E. (2004). Quality in virtual education environments. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 35, 1, 13-20.
5. Becker, H. J. (1995). National school network testbedphase 2 baseline of testbed-participating schools,Retrieved June 14, 2005, fromhttp://www.bie.org/ Ravitz/NSN_Baseline.pdf
6. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, October. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.pdkintl.org/ kappan/kbla9 810.htm
7. Bull, G. & Garofalo, J. (2003). Rationale for building an educational source forge. Learning & Leading with Technology, .30,8,18-21.
8. CEO Forum (2001). School technology and readiness report. Retrieved June 14, 2005, fromhttp://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report4.pdf
9. Chitwood, K., May, C., Bunnow, D. & Langan, T. (2000). Battle stories from the field: Wisconsin online resource center learning objects project. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/chitwood.doc
10. Cole, M. (2002). Virtual communities for learning and development-a look to the past and some glimpses into the future. In K. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds), Building virtual communities: learning and change in Cyberspace (pp. xxi-xxix). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Collings, P. & Pearce, J. (2002). Sharing designer and user perspectives of web site evaluation: a cross-campus collaborative learning experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 3.3,3,267-278.
12. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind S. & Tinker, B. (2000). Facilitating online learning: effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood.
13. Downes, S. (2005). Emergent learning: social networks and learning networks. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.downes.ca/files/osn.html
14. Ely, D. & Huberman, A. (1994). User-friendly handbook for project dissemination. NSF Publication #94-17. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination.
15. Frechtling, J. A. (Ed.) (1995). Footprints: strategies for non-traditional program evaluation (NSF 9541). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Research Evaluation and Dissemination.
16. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: The Palmer Press.
17. Gauss, B. & Urbas, L. (2003). Individual differences in navigation between sharable content objects-an evaluation study of a learning module prototype. British Journal of Education Technology, 34, 4, 499-509.
18. Gilbert, N. & Driscoll, M. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: a case study. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 50, 1, 59-79. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http:// www.aect.org/pdf/etr&d/5001/5001-05. pdf
19. Glenn, A. & Whitaker, S. (2003). Open resources and public/private partnerships. In Bull, G. & Garofalo, J. (Eds) (2003). Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Technology Leadership Summit: Open Researces in Education, 2, 4, 533-558. Retrieved June 15, 2005, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss4/general/ article2.cfm.
20. Haertel, G. D. & Means, B. (2003). Evaluating educational technology: effective research designs for improving learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Harris, J. & Swan, K. O. (2003). An educational open source development model. Learning & Leading with Technology, 30, 8, 22-24.
22. Hoadley, C. & Pea, R. D. (2002). Finding the ties that bind: tools in support of a knowledge-building community. In K. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds), Building virtual communities: learning andchange in Cyberspace (pp. 321-354). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hunter, B. (1995). Internetworking and educational reform: the National School Network Testbed. Paper presented at the International Networking Conference, '95 Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.bie.org/Ravitz/ hunter_inet95.html
24. Hunter, B. (2002). Learning in the virtual community depends on changes in local communities. In K. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds), Building virtual communities: learning and change in Cyberspace (pp. 96-128). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hutchings, P. & Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments. Change. 31, 5, 10-15, September/October 1999. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary/docs/ sotl1999 .htm
26. Lamon, M., Reeve, R. & Scardamalia, M. (2001). Mapping learning and the growth of knowledge in a knowledge building community. In M. Scardamalia (Ed.), New directions in knowledge building. Annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle, WA. Retrieved June 15, 2005, from http://ikit.org/lamon/mapping.html
27. Levin, J. & Cervantes, R. (2002). Understanding the life cycles of network-based learning communities. In K. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds), Building virtual communities: learning and change in Cyberspace (pp. 269-292). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Malcolm, M. (2005). The exercise of the object: issues in resource reusability and reuse. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 1, 33-41.
29. McAndrew, P., Clow, D., Taylor, J. & Aczel, J. (2004). The evolutionary design of a knowledge network to support knowledge management and sharing for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 6, 739-746.
30. Mergendoller, J. & Kajder, S. (2003). Proof of concept for open resources in education. Learning & Leading with Technology, 30, 8, 26-27.
31. MERLOT (2005). Evaluation standards for learning materials in MERLOT. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://taste.merlot.org/catalog/peer_review/ eval_criteria.htm
32. Moallem, M. (2003), An interactive online course: a collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51, 4, 85-103.
33. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (2002a). Preparing teachers to use technology. Retrieved 21 September, 2005, from http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_book. html
34. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (2002b). Appendix D: sample software and web site evaluation forms. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/pdf/ Appendix_D.pdf
35. Orihuela, J. (2003). Slogging and the eCommunication Paradigms: 10 principles of the new media scenario. BlogTalk, A Eurpoean Weblog Conference, Vienna, Austria, May 23-24. Retrieved 21 September, 2005, from http://mccd.udc.es/orihuela/blogtalk
36. Orrill, C. (2000). Learning objects to support inquiry-based online learning. In D. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://reusability.org/ read/chapters/orrill.doc
37. Pea, R. D., Tinker, R., Linn, M., Means, B., Bransford, J., Roschelle, J. etal (1999). Toward a learning technologies knowledge network. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 2 (also at http://www.stanford.edu/ ~roypea/RoyPDF%20foIder/A100_Pea_etaI_99_ CILT.pdf, retrieved 21 September 2005).
38. Peck, K. L, Augustine, C. & Popp, J. D. (2003). The AECT Project: modeling the effective use of technology in teacher preparation. Tech Trends, 47, 2, 21-23.
39. Plass, J. & Salisbury, M. (2002). A living systems design model for Web-based knowledge management systems. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 50, 1, 35-57.
40. Ravitz, J. (1995). Building collaborative online communities for K-12. In Proceedings of the Mid-continent Institute's Fourth Annual Innovations in Education Conference, Minot State University, Minot, ND, November 9-12 (pp. 71-83). Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.bie.org/Ravitz/Ravitz_Paper_8_9 5.html
41. Ravitz, J. (2004). A doorway to new tools and practices: supporting teacher education, research, and development with an online netcourse. In N. Sabelli & R. Pea (Eds), Center for innovative learning technologies: six years of knowledge networking in learning sciences and technologies (pp. 88-95). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http:// www.bie.org/tmp/research/CILT_Final_Ravitz.pdf
42. Ravitz, J. & Lake, D. (June, 1996). An authentic learning tool for teachers: the Oil WWW site evaluation form. FSU/AECT Conference on Distance Learning, Tallahassee, FL. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.bie.org/ Ravitz/authentic.html
43. Ravitz, J. & Serim, F. (April, 1997). Summary of first year evaluation report for the Online Internet Institute. Paper presented at Edward F. Kelly Evaluation Conference, State University of New York, Albany. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.bie.org/Ravitz/oii_summary.html
44. Recker, M, Waliser, A. & Wiley, D. (2000). Collaboratively filtering learning objects. In D. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/recker.doc
45. Recker, M. & Wiley, D. (2001). A non-authoritative educational metadata ontology for filtering and recommending learning objects. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, Special issue on metadata, 9, 3, 255-271.
46. Riding, P., Fowell, S. & Levy, P. (1995). An action research approach to curriculum development. Information Research, 1, 1. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://InforrnationR.net/ir/l-l/ paper2.html
47. Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd Edn.). New York: Free Press.
48. Sabelli, N. & Pea, R. (Eds) (2004). Center for innovative learning technologies: six years of knowledge networking in learning sciences and technologies. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved June 14, 2005, fromhttp://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/CILT_final.pdf
49. Schlager, M., Fusco, J. & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In K. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds), Building virtual communities: learning and change in Cyberspace (pp. 129-158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Shepherd, C. (2000). Objects of interest. Brighton East Sussex: Fastrak Consulting Limited.Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.fastrak-consulting. co.uk/tactix/features/objects/objects.htm
51. Tripp, S. D. & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid protoyping: an alternative instructional designstrategy. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 38, I, 31-44.
52. Walton, M. & Archer, A. (2004). The Web and information literacy: scaffolding the use of web sources in a project-based curriculum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 2, 173-186.
53. Weinberger, D. (2004). The digital future: blogging. C-SPAN Forum. Library of Congress Series on Digital Future-Part 1. Filmed at the Library of Congress Washington, DC, November 15,2004. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.c-span.org/congress/digitalfuture.asp
54. West, C., Farmer, J. & Wolff, P. (1991). Instructional design implications from cognitive science.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: online version. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc