Lifelong learning and second-order learning objects

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 701-715

  Allert, Heidrun ^a   Richter, Christoph ^a   Nejdl, Wolfgang ^a,b,c  

^a L3S RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b Department of Computer Science ^*  (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONMIC LIFE; LEARNING OBJECTS; LIFELONG LEARNING;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 9144229773     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00428.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allert, H., Richter, C. & Nejdl, W. (2003). Extending the scope of the current discussion on metadata towards situated models. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds), Designing for change (pp. 353-362). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning - a theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3. Bardram, J. E. (1997). Plans as situated action: an activity theory approach to workflow systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW'97 (pp. 17-32). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Commission of the European Communities (2000). Commission Staff Working Paper: Memorandum on Lifelong Learning Brussels, 30 October, SEC(2000) 1832, http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/lll/life/memoen.pdf.
5. Guarino, N. (1992). Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations: some linguistic and ontological criteria for structuring knowledge bases. Data & Knowledge Engeneering, 8, 249-261.
6. IEEE-LTSC (2002). WG12, Working Group Information, Announcements & News, Position Statement on 1484.12.1-2002 Learning Object Metadata (LOM) Standard Maintenance/Revision. 10 December.
7. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2003). IMS Learning Design Information Model, Version 1.0 Public Draft Specification http://www.imsglobal.org/ learningdesign/index.cfm.
8. Koper, R. (2001). Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective - the pedagogical metamodel behind EML. Open University of the Netherlands. First Draft, Version 2, 2001 http:\\eml.ou.nl\Introduction\docs\ped-metamodel. pdf.
9. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Oerter, R. (1994). Kultur- Erziehung - Sozialisation In K. A. Schneewind (Ed.), Psychologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation (pp. 135-165). GÖttingen: Hogrefe.
11. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: a comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 24-32). Proceedings of the computer-supported collaborative learning 2002 conference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3, 4.
13. Reiserer, M. & Mandl, H. (2002). Individuelle Bedingungen lebensbegleitenden Lernens. In R. Oerter & L. Montada (Eds), Entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 923-939). Weinheim: BeltzPVU.
14. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum education and technology: an encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
16. Scheunpflug, A. (2001). Evolutionäre Didaktik-Unterricht aus system- und evolutionstheoretischer Perspektive. Weinheim: Beltz.
17. Steimann, F. (2000a). Modellierung mit Rollen. Hanover: Habilitationsschrift University of Hanover.
18. Steimann, F. (2000b). On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modelling. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 35, 1, 83-106.
19. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J. & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In AI-Ed 95, the 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, August 16-19, Washington DC, pp. 266-273.
20. Suthers, D. (2001). Towards a Systematic Study of Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learning Discourse Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7, 3, 254-277.
21. Treml, A. K. (2000). Allgemeine Pädagogik Grundlagen, Handlungsfelder und Perspektiven der Erziehung Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany.
22. Volpert, W. (1999). Wie wir handeln - was wir können: Ein Disput als Einführung in die Handlungspsychologie (2nd Ed.). Sottrum: artefact Verlag.
23. Wiley, D. A. (2003). Learning objects: difficulties and opportunities. Retrieved December 4, from http:\\wiley.ed.usu.edu\docs\lo_do.pdf