Quality in virtual education environments

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 13-20

  Barbera, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TEACHING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ONLINE EDUCATION; VIRTUAL EDUCATION;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 1442336044     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00364.x     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Barbera E (2000) Study actions in a virtual university Virtual University Journal 3, 2, 31-42.
2. Barbera E (ed), Badia A and Mominó J M (2001) La incógnita de la educación a distancia UB ICE/Horsori, Barcelona.
3. California State University (2002) Proposed standards for developing and teaching online courses Digital campus CSU.
4. Frydenberg J (2002) Quality standards in e-learning: a matrix of analysis International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3, 2, 4-11.
5. Garrison D and Anderson, T (2003) E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice Routledge Palmer, London.
6. Garrison D R and Shale D (eds) (1987) Education at a distance: from issues to practice Krieger, Malabar.
7. Gosling D and D'Andrea V (2001) Quality development: a new concept for higher education Quality in Higher Education 7, 1, 7-17.
8. Gunawardena, C, Lowe, C and Carabajal, K (2000) Evaluating online learning: models and methods in Willis D A, Price J D and Willis J (eds) Proceedings of SITE 2000: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education international conference (Vols 1-3) Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
9. Harasim L, Roxanne S, Teles L and Turoff M (1995) Learning networks: a field guide to teaching and learning online Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
10. Harvey L (2002) The end of quality Quality in Higher Education 8, 1, 5-22.
11. IDE (Innovations in Distance Education) (1999) An emerging of guiding principles and practices for the design and development of distance education Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
12. Jonassen, D H (2000) Computers as mindtools for schools Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
13. Jonassen D H, Peck K L and Wilson B G (1999) Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Kirkwood A (1998) New media mania: can information and communication technologies enhance the quality of open and distance learning? Distance Education 19, 2, 228-241.
15. Little D and Banega B (1999) Development of standards or criteria for effective online courses Educational Technology & Society 2, 3, 4-15.
16. Moore, M (1989) Three types of interaction The American Journal of Distance Education 3, 2, 1-6.
17. Oliver R and Reeves T (1996) Dimensions of effective interactive learning with telematics for distance education Educational Technology Research and Development 44, 4, 45-56.
18. Petracchi H and Patchner M (2001) A comparison of life instruction and interactive televised teaching: a two-year assessment of teaching an MSW research methods course Research on Social Work Practice 11, 1, 108-117.
19. Reeves T (1994) Evaluating what really matters in computer-based education http://www.educationau.edu.au/archives/cp/reeves.htm (accessed 12 May 2003).
20. Rumble G (1997) The costs and economics of open and distance learning Kogan Page, London.
21. Sims R, Dodds G and Hand T (2001) Enhancing quality in online learning: scaffolding planning and design through proactive evaluation Distance Education 23, 2, 135-148.
22. Sparkes J J (1992) The quest for quality in distance education in Ortner G E, Graff K and Wilmersdoerfer H (eds) Distance education as two-way communication Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt, 133-146.
23. Tretin G (2000) The quality-interactivity relationship in distance education Educational Technology 40, 1, 17-27.