Genomics of the evolutionary process

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 316-321

  Clark, Andrew G ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 33744928349     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Cheng Z., et al. A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications. Nature 437 (2005) 88-93
2. Petrov D.A., et al. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science 287 (2000) 1060-1062
3. Wolfe K.H., et al. Function and evolution of a minimal plastid genome from a nonphotosynthetic parasitic plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89 (1992) 10648-10652
4. Moran N.A. Tracing the evolution of gene loss in obligate bacterial symbionts. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6 (2003) 512-518
5. Mower J.P., et al. Plant genetics: gene transfer from parasitic to host plants. Nature 432 (2004) 165-166
6. Lolle S.J., et al. Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis. Nature 434 (2005) 505-509
7. Malik H.S., et al. Recurrent evolution of DNA-binding motifs in the Drosophila centromeric histone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 1449-1454
8. Richly E., and Leister D. NUMTs in sequenced eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (2004) 1081-1084
9. Waterston R.H., et al. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420 (2002) 520-562
10. Dermitzakis E.T., et al. Numerous potentially functional but non-genic conserved sequences on human chromosome 21. Nature 420 (2002) 578-582
11. Dermitzakis E.T., et al. Evolutionary discrimination of mammalian conserved non-genic sequences (CNGs). Science 302 (2003) 1033-1035
12. Bejerano G., et al. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304 (2004) 1321-1325
13. Siepel A., et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 15 (2005) 1034-1050
14. Drake J.A., et al. Conserved noncoding sequences are selectively constrained and not mutation cold spots. Nat. Genet. 38 (2006) 223-227
15. Lall S., et al. A genome-wide map of conserved microRNA targets in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 16 (2006) 460-471
16. Lunter G., et al. Genome-wide identification of human functional DNA using a neutral indel model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 (2006) e5
17. Korf I., et al. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics 17 Suppl. 1 (2001) S140-S148
18. Wray G.A., et al. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 1377-1419
19. Boffelli D., et al. Phylogenetic shadowing of primate sequences to find functional regions of the human genome. Science 299 (2003) 1391-1394
20. ENCODE Project Consortium. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science 306 (2004) 636-640
21. Jukes T.H., and Cantor C.R. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H. (Ed). Mammalian Protein Metabolism III (1969), Academic Press 21-132
22. Karlin S., and Mrazek J. Compositional differences within and between eukaryotic genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 10227-10232
23. Singh N.D., et al. Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169 (2005) 709-722
24. Hughes A.L., and Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335 (1988) 167-170
25. Nielsen R., and Yang Z. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148 (1998) 929-936
26. Hudson R.R., et al. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116 (1987) 153-159
27. McDonald J.H., and Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351 (1991) 652-654
28. Akey J.M., et al. Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes. PLoS Biol. 2 (2004) e286
29. Bustamante C.D., et al. Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature 437 (2005) 1153-1157
30. Jensen J.D., et al. Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data. Genetics 170 (2005) 1401-1410
31. Wright S.I., et al. The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308 (2005) 1310-1314
32. Clark A.G., et al. Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res. 15 (2005) 1496-1502
33. Nielsen R., et al. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 3 (2005) 976-985
34. Mueller L.A., et al. The SOL Genomics Network: a comparative resource for Solanaceae biology and beyond. Plant Physiol. 138 (2005) 1310-1317
35. Sunyaev S., et al. Prediction of deleterious human alleles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10 (2001) 591-597
36. Ng P.C., and Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003) 3812-3814
37. Clark A.G., et al. Inferring nonneutral evolution from human-chimp-mouse orthologous gene trios. Science 302 (2003) 1960-1963
38. Wong W.S., et al. Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites. Genetics 168 (2004) 1041-1051
39. Miller W., et al. Comparative genomics. Annu. Rev. Genomics. Hum. Genet. 5 (2004) 15-56
40. Angelini D.R., and Kaufman T.C. Comparative developmental genetics and the evolution of arthropod body plans. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39 (2005) 95-119
41. Yuh C.H., and Davidson E.H. Modular cis-regulatory organization of Endo16, a gut-specific gene of the sea urchin embryo. Development 122 (1996) 1069-1082
42. Otim O., et al. Expression of AmHNF6, a sea star orthologue of a transcription factor with multiple distinct roles in sea urchin development. Gene Expr. Patt. 5 (2005) 381-386
43. Anderson S., et al. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 290 (1981) 457-465
44. Li W.-H., et al. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2 (1985) 150-174
45. Presgraves D.C., et al. Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423 (2003) 715-719
46. Barbash D.A., et al. A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 5302-5307
47. Sun S., et al. The normal function of a speciation gene, Odysseus, and its hybrid sterility effect. Science 305 (2004) 81-83
48. Ranz J.M., et al. Anomalies in the expression profile of interspecific hybrids of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 373-379
49. Richards S., et al. Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res. 15 (2005) 1-18
50. Christophides G.K., et al. Comparative and functional genomics of the innate immune system in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Immunol. Rev. 198 (2004) 127-148