The arbitrary mapping of sensory inputs to voluntary and involuntary movement: Learning-dependent activity in the motor cortex and other telencephalic networks

Motor Cortex in Voluntary Movements: A Distributed System for Distributed Functions

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 259-296

  Brasted, Peter J ^a   Wise, Steven P ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646507253     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (134)

1. Wise, S.P., di Pellegrino, G., and Boussaoud, D., The premotor cortex and nonstandard sensorimotor mapping, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 74, 469, 1996.
2. Passingham, R.E., The Frontal Lobes and Voluntary Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
3. Dickinson, A. and Balleine, B., Motivational control of goal-directed action., Animal Learn. Behav., 22, 1, 1994.
4. McDonald, R.J. and White, N.M., A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum, Behav. Neurosci., 107, 3, 1993.
5. Jog, M.S. et al., Building neural representations of habits, Science, 286, 1745, 1999.
6. Wise, S.P., Evolution of neuronal activity during conditional motor learning, in Acquisition of Motor Behavior in Vertebrates, Bloedel, J.R., Ebner, T.J., and Wise, S.P., Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, 261.
7. Wise, S.P. and Murray, E.A., Role of the hippocampal system in conditional motor learning: mapping antecedents to action, Hippocampus, 9, 101, 1999.
8. Wise, S.P. and Murray, E.A., Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions, Trends Neurosci., 23, 271, 2000.
9. Murray, E.A., Bussey, T.J., and Wise, S.P., Role of prefrontal cortex in a network for arbitrary visuomotor mapping, Exp. Brain Res., 133, 114, 2000.
10. Murray, E.A., Brasted, P.J., and Wise, S.P., Arbitrary sensorimotor mapping and the life of primates, in Neuropsychology of Memory, Squire, L.R. and Schacter, D.L., Eds., Guilford, New York, 2002, 339.
11. Shadmehr, R. et al., Learning dynamics of reaching, in Motor Cortex in Voluntary Movements, Riehle, A. and Vaadia, E., Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
12. Pearce, J.M., Animal Learning and Cognition: An Introduction, Psychology Press, UK, 1997.
13. Thorndike, E.L., Animal Intelligence, Macmillan, New York, 1911.
14. Guthrie, E.R., The Psychology of Learning, Harper, New York, 1935.
15. Hull, C.L., Principles of Behavior, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1943.
16. Adams, C.D. and Dickinson, A., Actions and habits: variations in associative representations during instrumental learning, in Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms, Spear, N.E. and Miller, R.R., Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1981, 143.
17. Colwill, R.M. and Rescorla, R.A., Instrumental responding remains sensitive to reinforcer devaluation after extensive training, J. Exp. Psychol. Animal Behav. Proc., 11, 520, 1985.
18. Balleine, B.W. and Dickinson, A., Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates, Neuropharmacology, 37, 407, 1998.
19. Corbit, L.H. and Balleine, B.W., The role of the hippocampus in instrumental conditioning, J. Neurosci., 20, 4233, 2000.
20. di Pellegrino, G. and Wise, S.P., Visuospatial vs. visuomotor activity in the premotor and prefrontal cortex of a primate, J. Neurosci., 13, 1227, 1993.
21. Riehle, A., Kornblum, S., and Requin, J., Neuronal coding of stimulus-response association rules in the motor cortex, NeuroReport, 5, 2462, 1994.
22. White, I.M. and Wise, S.P., Rule-dependent neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex, Exp. Brain Res., 126, 315, 1999.
23. Wallis, J.D., Anderson, K.C., and Miller, E.K., Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules, Nature, 411, 953, 2001.
24. Hoshi, E., Shima, K., and Tanji, J., Neuronal activity in the primate prefrontal cortex in the process of motor selection based on two behavioral rules, J. Neurophysiol., 83, 2355, 2000.
25. Kimura, M., The role of primate putamen neurons in the association of sensory stimuli with movement, Neurosci. Res., 3, 436, 1986.
26. Aosaki, T. et al., Responses of tonically active neurons in the primate’s striatum undergo systematic changes during behavioral sensorimotor conditioning, J. Neurosci., 14, 3969, 1994.
27. Aosaki, T., Graybiel, A.M., and Kimura, M., Effect of the nigrostriatal dopamine system on acquired neural responses in the striatum of behaving monkeys, Science, 265, 412, 1994.
28. Raz, A. et al., Neuronal synchronization of tonically active neurons in the striatum of normal and parkinsonian primates, J. Neurophysiol., 76, 1996
29. Rosenkranz, J.A. and Grace, A.A., Dopamine-mediated modulation of odour-evoked amygdala potentials during Pavlovian conditioning, Nature, 417, 282, 2002.
30. Schafe, G.E. et al., Memory consolidation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: a cellular and molecular perspective, Trends Neurosci., 24, 540, 2001.
31. Repa, J.C. et al., Two different lateral amygdala cell populations contribute to the initiation and storage of memory, Nat. Neurosci., 4, 724, 2001.
32. Aou, A., Woody, C.D., and Birt, D., Increases in excitability of neurons of the motor cortex of cats after rapid acquisition of eye blink conditioning, J. Neurosci., 12, 560, 1992.
33. Steinmetz, J.E., Brain substrates of classical eyeblink conditioning: a highly localized but also distributed system, Behav. Brain Res., 110, 13, 2000.
34. McEchron, M.D. and Disterhoft, J.F., Hippocampal encoding of non-spatial trace conditioning, Hippocampus, 9, 385, 1999.
35. Kimura, M., Rajkowski, J., and Evarts, E., Tonically discharging putamen neurons exhibit set-dependent responses, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 81, 4998, 1984.
36. Aosaki, T., Kimura, M., and Graybiel, A.M., Temporal and spatial characteristics of tonically active neurons of the primate’s striatum, J. Neurophysiol., 73, 1234, 1995.
37. Ravel, S., Legallet, E., and Apicella, P., Tonically active neurons in the monkey striatum do not preferentially respond to appetitive stimuli, Exp. Brain Res., 128, 531, 1999.
38. Blazquez, P.M. et al., A network representation of response probability in the striatum, Neuron, 33, 973, 2002.
39. Apicella, P., Legallet, E., and Trouche, E., Responses of tonically discharging neurons in the monkey striatum to primary rewards delivered during different behavioral states, Exp. Brain Res., 116, 456-466.
40. Ravel, S. et al., Reward unpredictability inside and outside of a task context as a determinant of the responses of tonically active neurons in the monkey striatum, J. Neurosci., 21, 5730, 2001.
41. Lebedev, M.A. and Nelson, R.J., Rhythmically firing neostriatal neurons in monkey:activity patterns during reaction-time hand movements, J. Neurophysiol., 82, 1832, 1999.
42. Shimo, Y. and Hikosaka, O., Role of tonically active neurons in primate caudate in reward-oriented saccadic eye movement, J. Neurosci., 21, 7804, 2001.
43. Schultz, W. and Dickinson, A., Neuronal coding of prediction errors, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 23, 473, 2000.
44. Robbins, T.W. and Everitt, B.J., Neurobehavioral mechanisms of reward and motivation, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 6, 228, 1996.
45. Schultz, W., Dopamine neurons and their role in reward mechanisms, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 7, 191, 1997.
46. Ljungberg, T., Apicella, P., and Schultz, W., Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavior reactions, J. Neurophysiol., 67, 145, 1992.
47. Hollerman, J.R. and Schultz, W., Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning, Nat. Neurosci., 1, 304, 1998.
48. Schultz, W., Apicella, P., and Ljungberg, T., Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task, J. Neurosci., 13, 900, 1993.
49. Schultz, W., Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons, J. Neurophysiol., 80, 1, 1998.
50. Waelti, P., Dickinson, A., and Schultz, W., Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory, Nature, 412, 43, 2001.
51. Mackintosh, N.M., A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement, Psychol. Rev., 82, 276, 1975.
52. Pearce, J.M. and Hall, G., A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli, Psychol. Rev., 87, 532, 1980.
53. Rescorla, R.A. and Wagner, A.R., A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement, in Classical Conditioning:Current Research and Theory, Black, A.H. and Prokasy, W.F., Eds., Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1972, 64.
54. Kamin, L.J., Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning, in Punishment and Aversive Behavior, Campbell, B.A. and Church, R.M., Eds., Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1969, 279.
55. Suri, R.E. and Schultz, W., Learning of sequential movements by neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal, Exp. Brain Res., 121, 350-354.
56. Kim, J.J., Krupa, D.J., and Thompson, R.F., Inhibitory cerebello-olivary projections and blocking effect in classical conditioning, Science, 279, 570, 1998.
57. Medina, J.F. et al., Parallels between cerebellum- and amygdala-dependent conditioning, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 122, 2002.
58. Everitt, B.J., Dickinson, A., and Robbins, T.W., The neuropsychological basis of addictive behaviour, Brain Res. Rev., 36, 129, 2001.
59. Baxter, M.G. and Murray, E.A., The amygdala and reward, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 563, 2002.
60. Cardinal, R.N. et al., Effects of selective excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens core, anterior cingulate cortex, and central nucleus of the amygdala on autoshaping performance in rats, Behav. Neurosci., 116, 553, 2002.
61. Parkinson, J.A. et al., Disconnection of the anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens core impairs Pavlovian approach behavior: further evidence for limbic cortical-ventral striatopallidal systems, Behav. Neurosci., 114, 42, 2000.
62. Rao, A.K. and Shadmehr, R., Contextual cues facilitate learning of multiple models of arm dynamics, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 26, 302, 2001.
63. Wada, Y. et al., Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields, Neurosci. Res., 46, 319, 2003.
64. Packard, M.G., Hirsh, R., and White, N.M., Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems, J. Neurosci., 9, 1465, 1989.
65. Carelli, R.M., Wolske, M., and West, M.O., Loss of lever press-related firing of rat striatal forelimb neurons after repeated sessions in a lever pressing task, J. Neurosci., 17, 1804, 1997.
66. Wise, S.P., The role of the basal ganglia in procedural memory, Sem. Neurosci., 8, 39, 1996.
67. Gaffan, D., Memory, action and the corpus striatum: current developments in the memory-habit distinction, Sem. Neurosci., 8, 33, 1996.
68. Mishkin, M. and Petri, H.L., Memories and habits: some implications for the analysis of learning and retention, in Neuropsychology of Memory, Squire, L.R. and Butters, N., Eds., Guilford Press, New York, 1984, 287.
69. Knowlton, B.J., Mangels, J.A., and Squire, L.R., A neostriatal habit learning system in humans, Science, 273, 1399, 1996.
70. Houk, J.C. and Wise, S.P., Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action, Cereb. Cortex, 5, 95, 1995.
71. Tulving, E., Episodic memory and common sense: how far apart? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 356, 1505, 2001.
72. Reber, P.J., Attempting to model dissociations of memory, Trends Cog. Sci., 6, 192, 2002.
73. Squire, L.R. and Zola, S.M., Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93, 13515, 1996.
74. Petrides, M., Deficits in non-spatial conditional associative learning after periarcuate lesions in the monkey, Behav. Brain Res., 16, 95, 1985.
75. Halsband, U. and Passingham, R.E., Premotor cortex and the conditions for a movement in monkeys, Behav. Brain Res., 18, 269, 1985.
76. Kurata, K. and Hoffman, D.S., Differential effects of muscimol microinjection into dorsal and ventral aspects of the premotor cortex of monkeys, J. Neurophysiol., 71, 1151, 1994.
77. Passingham, R.E., Toni, I., and Rushworth, M.F., Specialisation within the prefrontal cortex: the ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning, Exp. Brain Res., 133, 103, 2000.
78. Gaffan, D. and Harrison, S., Inferotemporal-frontal disconnection and fornix transection in visuomotor conditional learning by monkeys, Behav. Brain Res., 31, 149, 1988.
79. Bussey, T.J., Wise, S.P., and Murray, E.A., Interaction of ventral and orbital prefrontal cortex with inferotemporal cortex in conditional visuomotor learning, Behav. Neurosci., 116, 703, 2002.
80. Eacott, M.J. and Gaffan, D., Inferotemporal-frontal disconnection: the uncinate fascicle and visual associative learning in monkeys, Eur. J. Neurosci., 4, 1320, 1992.
81. Bussey, T.J., Wise, S.P., and Murray, E.A., The role of ventral and orbital prefrontal cortex in conditional visuomotor learning and strategy use in rhesus monkeys (Macacca mulatta), Behav. Neurosci., 115, 971, 2001.
82. Wang, M., Zhang, H., and Li, B.M., Deficit in conditional visuomotor learning by local infusion of bicuculline into the ventral prefrontal cortex in monkeys, Eur. J. Neurosci., 12, 3787, 2000.
83. Rushworth, M.F. et al., Attentional selection and action selection in the ventral prefrontal cortex, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 28, 722.11, 2003.
84. Gaffan, D., Easton, A., and Parker, A., Interaction of inferior temporal cortex with frontal cortex and basal forebrain: double dissociation in strategy implementation and associative learning, J. Neurosci., 22, 7288, 2002.
85. Collins, P. et al., Perseveration and strategy in a novel spatial self-ordered sequencing task for nonhuman primates: effects of excitotoxic lesions and dopamine depletions of the prefrontal cortex, J. Cog. Neurosci., 10, 332, 1998.
86. Murray, E.A. and Wise, S.P., Role of the hippocampus plus subjacent cortex but not amygdala in visuomotor conditional learning in rhesus monkeys, Behav. Neurosci., 110, 1261, 1996.
87. Rupniak, N.M.J. and Gaffan, D., Monkey hippocampus and learning about spatially directed movements, J. Neurosci., 7, 2331, 1987.
88. Brasted, P.J. et al., Fornix transection impairs conditional visuomotor learning in tasks involving nonspatially differentiated responses, J. Neurophysiol., 87, 631, 2002.
89. BcClelland, J.L., McNaughton, B., and O’Reilly, R., Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory, Psychol. Rev., 102, 419, 1995.
90. Brasted, P.J. et al., Bilateral excitotoxic hippocampal lesions do not impair nonspatial conditional visuomotor learning in a task sensitive to fornix transection, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 28, 129.4, 2003.
91. Canavan, A.G.M., Nixon, P.D., and Passingham, R.E., Motor learning in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with lesions in motor thalamus, Exp. Brain Res., 77, 113, 1989.
92. Nixon P.D. et al., Corticostriatal pathways in conditional visuomotor learning, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 27, 282.1, 2002.
93. Nixon, P.D. and Passingham, R.E., The cerebellum and cognition: cerebellar lesions impair sequence learning but not conditional visuomotor learning in monkeys, Neuropsychologia, 38, 1054, 2000.
94. Tucker, J. et al., Associative learning in patients with cerebellar ataxia, Behav. Neurosci., 110, 1229, 1996.
95. Thaler, D. et al., The functions of the medial premotor cortex (SMA) I. Simple learned movements, Exp. Brain Res., 102, 445, 1995.
96. Chen, Y.-C. et al., The functions of the medial premotor cortex (SMA) II. The timing and selection of learned movements, Exp. Brain Res., 102, 461, 1995.
97. Gaffan, D. and Harrison, S., A comparison of the effects of fornix transection and sulcus principalis ablation upon spatial learning by monkeys, Behav. Brain Res., 31, 207, 1989.
98. Petrides, M., Motor conditional associative-learning after selective prefrontal lesions in the monkey, Behav. Brain Res., 5, 407, 1982.
99. Petrides, M., Conditional learning and the primate frontal cortex, in The Frontal Lobes Revisited, Perecman, E., Ed., IRBN Press, New York, 1987, 91.
100. Rushworth, M.F.S., Nixon, P.D., and Passingham, R.E., Parietal cortex and movement. I. Movement selection and reaching, Exp. Brain Res., 117, 292, 1997.
101. Pisella, L. et al., An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex:toward reinterpreting optic ataxia, Nat. Neurosci., 3, 729, 2000.
102. Passingham, R.E., From where does the motor cortex get its instruction? in Higher Brain Functions, Wise, S.P., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987, 67.
103. Wise, S.P., Murray, E.A., and Gerfen, C.R., The frontal cortex-basal ganglia system in primates, Crit. Rev. Neurobiol., 10, 317, 1996.
104. Hikosaka, O. et al., Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures, Trends Neurosci., 22, 464, 1999.
105. Mitz, A.R., Godschalk, M., and Wise, S.P., Learning-dependent neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys, J. Neurosci., 11, 1855, 1991.
106. Chen, L.L. and Wise, S.P., Neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations, J. Neurophysiol., 73, 1101, 1995.
107. Germain, L. and Lamarre, Y., Neuronal activity in the motor and premotor cortices before and after learning the associations between auditory stimuli and motor responses, Brain Res., 611, 175, 1993.
108. Asaad, W.F., Rainer, G., and Miller, E.K., Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning, Neuron, 21, 1399, 1998.
109. Tremblay, L., Hollerman, J.R., and Schultz, W., Modifications of reward expectationrelated neuronal activity during learning in primate striatum, J. Neurophysiol., 80, 964, 1998.
110. Hollerman, J.R., Tremblay, L., and Schultz, W., Influence of reward expectation on behavior-related neuronal activity in primate striatum, J. Neurophysiol., 80, 947, 1998.
111. Brasted, P.J. and Wise, S.P., Comparison of learning-related neuronal activity in the dorsal premotor cortex and striatum, Eur. J. Neurosci., 19, 721, 2004.
112. Inase, M. et al., Pallidal activity is involved in visuomotor association learning in monkeys, Eur. J. Neurosci., 14, 897, 2001.
113. Middleton, F.A. and Strick, P.L., Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function, Science, 266, 458, 1994.
114. Cahusac, P.M. et al., Modification of the responses of hippocampal neurons in the monkey during the learning of a conditional spatial response task, Hippocampus, 3, 29, 1993.
115. Wirth, S. et al., Single neurons in the monkey hippocampus and learning of new associations, Science, 300, 1578, 2003.
116. Logothetis, N.K. et al., Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal, Nature, 412, 150, 2001.
117. Logothetis, N.K., MR imaging in the non-human primate: studies of function and of dynamic connectivity, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 13, 630, 2003.
118. Aguirre, G.K. and D’Esposito, M., Experimental design for brain fMRI, in Functional MRI, Moonen, C.T.W. and Bandettini, P.A., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000, 369.
119. Deiber, M.P. et al., Frontal and parietal networks for conditional motor learning: a positron emission tomography study, J. Neurophysiol., 78, 977, 1997.
120. Eliassen, J.C., Souza, T., and Sanes, J.N., Experience-dependent activation patterns in human brain during visual-motor associative learning, J. Neurosci., 23, 10540, 2003.
121. Toni, I. and Passingham, R.E., Prefrontal-basal ganglia pathways are involved in the learning of arbitrary visuomotor associations: a PET study, Exp. Brain Res., 127, 19, 1999.
122. Toni, I. et al., Learning arbitrary visuomotor associations: temporal dynamic of brain activity, NeuroImage, 14, 1048, 2001.
123. Deiber, M.P. et al., Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography, Exp. Brain Res., 84, 393, 1991.
124. Grafton, S.T., Fagg, A.H., and Arbib, M.A., Dorsal premotor cortex and conditional movement selection: a PET functional mapping study, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 1092, 1998.
125. Toni, I., Rushworth, M.F., and Passingham, R.E., Neural correlates of visuomotor associations. Spatial rules compared with arbitrary rules, Exp. Brain Res., 141, 359, 2001.
126. Ramnani, N. and Miall, R.C., A system in the human brain for predicting the action of others, Nat. Neurosci., 7, 85, 2004.
127. Sweeney, J.A. et al., Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory, J. Neurophysiol., 75, 454, 1996.
128. Wise, S.P., Weinrich, M., and Mauritz, K.-H., Movement-related activity in the premotor cortex of rhesus macaques, Prog. Brain Res., 64, 117, 1986.
129. Chen, L.L. and Wise, S.P., Supplementary eye field contrasted with the frontal eye field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations, J. Neurophysiol., 73, 1122, 1995.
130. Toni, I. et al., Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning, Cereb. Cortex, 12, 1040, 2002.
131. Paus, T. et al., Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study, J. Neurophysiol., 70, 453, 1993.
132. Dolan, R.J. and Strange, B.A., Hippocampal novelty responses studied with functional neuroimaging, in Neuropsychology of Memory, Squire, L.R. and Schacter, D.L., Eds., Guilford, New York, 2002, 204.
133. Strange, B.A. et al., Anterior prefrontal cortex mediates rule learning in humans, Cereb. Cortex, 11, 1040, 2001.
134. Wallis, J.D. and Miller, E.K., From rule to response: neuronal processes in the premotor and prefrontal cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 90, 1790, 2003.