Single neurons in the monkey hippocampus and learning of new associations

Science

Volumn 300, Issue 5625, 2003, Pages 1578-1581

  Wirth, Sylvia ^a   Yanike, Marianna ^a   Frank, Loren M ^b   Smith, Anne C ^b   Brown, Emery N ^b   Suzuki, Wendy A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; NEUROLOGY;

MONKEY HIPPOCAMPUS;

BIOCOMMUNICATIONS;

NEUROLOGY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; MACACA; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE;

NON-PROGRAMMATIC;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HIPPOCAMPUS; MACACA MULATTA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; NEURONS;

ANIMALIA; HIPPOCAMPUS HIPPOCAMPUS; MACACA;

EID: 0037567220     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1084324     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. W. B. Scoville, B. Milner, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 20, 11 (1957).
2. L. R. Squire, S. M. Zola, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 13515 (1996).
3. H. Eichenbaum, N. J. Cohen, From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2001).
4. T. W. Berger, B. E. Alger, R. F. Thompson, Science 192, 483 (1976).
5. M. D. McEchron, J. F. Disterhoft, Hippocampus 9, 385 (1999).
6. M. Fyhn, S. Molden, S. Hollup, M. B. Moser, E. I. Moser, Neuron 35, 555 (2002).
7. Y. Naya, M. Yoshida, Y. Miyashita, Science 291,661 (2001).
8. K. Sakai, Y. Miyashita, Nature 354, 152 (1991).
9. C A. Erickson, R. Desimone, J. Neurosci. 19, 10404 (1999).
10. A. Messinger, L. R. Squire, S. M. Zola, T. D. Albright, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 12239 (2001).
11. P. M. Cahusac, E. T. Rolls, Y. Miyashita, H. Niki, Hippocampus 3, 29 (1993).
12. C. A. Erickson, B. Jagadeesh, R. Desimone, Nature Neurosci. 3, 1143 (2000).
13. Information on materials and methods is available on Science Online.
14. L. M. Frank, E. N. Brown, M. A. Wilson, J. Neurophys. 86, 2029 (2001).
15. Although all 89 selective cells exhibited a significant difference between baseline and the average response to all scenes during either the scene or delay periods, not all 89 cells exhibited a significant difference between baseline and their responses to individual scenes.
16. Of the 25 changing cells, 19 cells changed for one scene, 5 cells changed for two scenes, and 1 cell changed for three scenes.
17. S. Siegel, N. J. Castellan, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (McGraw-Hill New York 1988).
18. All changing cells exhibited a significant increase or decrease between the scene or delay period activity on the first 10 trials relative to the last 10 trials of the session, according to a paired t test (P < 0.05).
19. S. L. Moody, S. P. Wise, G. Dipellegrino, D. A. Zipser, J. Neurosci. 18, 399 (1998).
20. L. L. Chen, S. P. Wise, J. Neurophysiol. 73, 1101 (1995).
21. A. R. Mitz, M. Godschalk, S. P. Wise, J. Neurosci. 11, 1855 (1991).
22. J. C. Repa et al., Nature Neurosci. 4, 724 (2001).
23. W. F. Asaad, G. Rainer, E. K. Miller, Neuron 21, 1399 (1998).
24. L. L. Chen, S. P. Wise, J. Neurophysiol. 73, 1122 (1995).
25. Supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and a joint Bioengineering Research Partnership grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (E.N.B. and W.A.S.) and grants from the McKnight Foundation and the John Merck Fund (W.A.S.). We thank C. Chiu and N. Nystrom for help with the recording experiments; S. Fujisawa, A. Schain, and T. Shah for early contributions to the analysis; and T. Movshon for helpful comments on the manuscript.