X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution

Genome Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 498-504

  Thornton, Kevin ^a   Bachtrog, Doris ^b   Andolfatto, Peter ^b  

^a Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; SPECIES COMPARISON; X CHROMOSOME;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENES, INSECT; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; X CHROMOSOME;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA MIRANDA; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA;

EID: 33645505597     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.4447906     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, M.D., Celniker, S.E., Holt, R.A., Evans, C.A., Gocayne, J.D., Amanatides, P.G., Scherer, S.E., Li, P.W., Hoskins, R.A., Galle, R.F., et al. 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287: 2185-2195.
2. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Muller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
3. Andolfatto, P. 2001. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 279-290.
4. _.2005. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 437: 1149-1153.
5. Barbash, D.A., Awadalla, P., and Tarone, A.M. 2004. Functional divergence caused by ancient positive selection of a Drosophila hybrid incompatibility locus. PLoS Biol. 2: 839-848.
6. Bartolome, C., Maside, X., Yi, S., Grant, A.L., and Charlesworth, B. 2005. Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 169: 1495-1507.
7. Bauer, V.L. and Aquadro, C.F. 1997. Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 1252-1257.
8. Begun, D. and Whitley, P. 2000. Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 5960-5965.
9. Bergman, C.M., Pfeiffer, B.D., Rincón-Limas, D.E., Hoskins, R.A., Gnirke, A., Mungall, C.J., Wang, A.M., Kronmiller, B., Pacleb, J., Park, S., et al. 2002. Assessing the impact of comparative genomic sequence data on the functional annotation of the Drosophila genome. Genome Biol. 3: r0086.0081-0086.0020.
10. Betancourt, A.J., Presgraves, D.C., and Swanson, W.J. 2002. A test for faster X evolution in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1816-1819.
11. Bierne, N. and Eyre-Walker, A. 2004. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1350-1360.
12. Braverman, J.M., Hudson, R.R., Kaplan, N.L., Langley, C.H., and Stephan, W. 1995. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency-spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140: 783-796.
13. Bustamante, C.D., Nielsen, R., Sawyer, S.A., Olsen, K.M., Purugganan, M.D., and Hartl, D.L. 2002. The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis. Nature 416: 531-534.
14. Charlesworth, B. 2001. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genet. Res. 77: 153-166.
15. Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J.A., and Barton, N.H. 1983. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130: 113-146.
16. Comeron, J.M., Kreitman, M., and Aguade, M. 1999. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151: 239-249.
17. Counterman, B.A., Ortiz-Barrientos, D., and Noor, M.A. 2004. Using comparative genomic data to test for faster-X evolution. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 58: 656-660.
18. Coyne, J.A. and Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
19. Coyne, J.A., Elwyn, S., Kim, S.Y., and Llopart, A. 2004. Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. Genet. Res. 84: 11-26.
20. Dunn, K.A., Bielawski, J.P., and Yang, Z. 2001. Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genomes: Implications for translational selection. Genetics 157: 295-305.
21. Dykhuizen, D. and Hartl, D.L. 1980. Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics 96: 801-817.
22. Ewing, B. and Green, P. 1998. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8: 186-194.
23. Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M., and Green, P. 1998. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8: 175-185.
24. Fay, J., Wyckoff, G., and Wu, C. 2002. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila. Nature 415: 1024-1026.
25. Gordon, G.C., Abajian, C., and Green, P. 1998. Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8: 195-202.
26. Haldane, J.B.S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in animal hybrids. J. Genet. 12: 101-109.
27. Innan, H. and Kim, Y. 2004. Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 10667-10672.
28. Lu, J. and Wu, C.I. 2005. Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 4063-4067.
29. Malcolm, C.M., Wyckoff, G.J., and Lahn, B.T. 2003. Genic mutation rates in mammals: Local similarity, chromosomal heterogeneity, and X-versus-autosome disparity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1633-1641.
30. McVean, G.T. and Hurst, L.D. 1997. Evidence for a selectively favourable reduction in the mutation rate of the X chromosome. Nature 386: 388-392.
31. Morgenstern, B. 1999. DIALIGN 2: Improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 15: 211-218.
32. Muller, H.J. 1940. Bearings of the Drosophila work on systematics. In The new systematics (ed. J.S. Huxley), pp. 185-268. Oxford University Press, London.
33. Naveira, H.F. 2003. On the relative roles of faster-X evolution and dominance in the establishment of intrinsic postzygotic isolating barriers. Genetica 118: 41-45.
34. Orr, H.A. and Betancourt, A.J. 2001. Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157: 875-884.
35. Parisi, M., Nuttall, R., Naiman, D., Bouffard, G., Malley, J., Andrews, J., Eastman, S., and Oliver, B. 2003. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 299: 697-700.
36. Payseur, B.A., Cutter, A.D., and Nachman, M.W. 2002. Searching for evidence of positive selection in the human genome using patterns of microsatellite variability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1143-1153.
37. Presgraves, D.C., Balagopalan, L., Abmayr, S.M., and Orr, H.A. 2003. Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
38. Richards, S., Liu, Y., Bettencourt, B.R., Hradecky, P., Letovsky, S., Nielsen, R., Thornton, K., Hubisz, M.J., Chen, R., Meisel, R.P., et al. 2005. Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: Chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res. 15: 1-18.
39. Rozen, S. and Skaletsky, H. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In Bioinformatics methods and protocols: Methods in molecular biology (eds. S. Krawertz and S. Misener), pp. 365-386. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
40. Sawyer, S., Kulathinal, R., Bustamante, C., and Hartl, D. 2003. Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection. J. Mol. Evol. 57: S154-S164.
41. Singh, N.D., Davis, J.C., and Petrov, D.A. 2005. X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Genetics 169: 709-722.
42. Smith, N. and Eyre-Walker, A. 2002. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 415: 1022-1024.
43. Sundström, H., Webster, M., and Ellegren, H. 2004. Reduced variation on the chicken Z chromosome. Genetics 167: 377-385.
44. Takano, T.S. 1998. Rate variation of DNA sequence evolution in the Drosophila lineages. Genetics 149: 959-970.
45. Tao, Y. and Hartl, D.L. 2003. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57: 2580-2598.
46. Thornton, K. and Long, M. 2002. Rapid divergence of gene duplicates on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 918-925.
47. Ting, C.-T., Tsaur, S.-C., Wu, M.-L., and Wu, C.I. 1998. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282: 1501-1504.
48. Turelli, M. and Orr, H.A. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140: 389-402.
49. Wall, J.D., Andolfatto, P., and Przeworski, M. 2002. Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 162: 203-216.
50. Yang, Z.H. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 555-556.
51. Zhang, Z., Hambuch, T.M., and Parsch, J. 2004. Molecular evolution of sex-biased genes in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 2130-2139.