Individual differences in conditional reasoning: A dual-process account

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 305-325

  Klaczynski, Paul A ^a   Daniel, David B ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645063281     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546780442000196     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Almor, A., & Sloman, S. A. (1996). Is deontic reasoning special? Psychological Review, 103, 374-380.
2. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-286.
3. Cummins, D. (1995). Naïve theories and causal deduction. Memory and Cognition, 23, 646-658.
4. Cummins, D. (1996). Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old children. Memory & Cognition, 24, 823-829
5. Epstein, S., & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462-482). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
7. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978-996.
8. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Reasoning and rationality. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.
10. Handley, S. J., Capon, A., Beveridge, M., Dennis, I., & Evans, J. St. B. T. (2004). Working memory, inhibitory control and the development of children's reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 123-146.
11. Janveau-Brennen, G., & Markovits, H. (1999). The development of reasoning with causal conditionals. Developmental Psychology, 35, 904-911.
12. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Klaczynski, P. A. (2001 a). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision making. Child Development, 72, 844-861.
14. Klaczynski, P. A. (2001b). Framing effects on adolescent task representations, analytic and heuristic processing, and decision making: Implications for the normative-descriptive gap. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 289-309.
15. Klaczynski, P. A. (2004). A dual-process model of adolescent development: Implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 31 (pp. 73-123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Klaczynski, P. A., & Cottrell, J. E. (2004). A dual-process approach to cognitive development: The case of children's understanding of sunk cost decisions. Thinking & Reasoning, 10, 147-174.
17. Klaczynski, P. A., & Gordon, D. H. (1996). Self-serving influences on adolescents' evaluations of belief-relevant evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 317-339.
18. Klaczynski, P. A., & Narasimham, G. (1998). Problem representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 34, 865-881.
19. Klaczynski, P. A., Schuneman, M. J., & Daniel, D. B. (2004). Theories of conditional reasoning: A developmental examination of competing hypotheses. Developmental Psychology, 40, 559-571.
20. Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26-52.
21. Markovits, H. (2000). A mental models analysis of young children's conditional reasoning with meaningful premises. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 335-347.
22. Markovits, H., & Barrouillet, P. (2002). The development of conditional reasoning: A mental model account. Developmental Review, 22, 5-36.
23. Markovits, H., Doyon, C., & Simoneau. M. (2002). Individual differences on working memory and conditional reasoning with concrete and abstract premises. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 97-107.
24. Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H., & Farrelly, D. (2004). Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 3360.
25. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data analysis. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
26. O'Brien, D. P., & Overton, W. F. (1982). Conditional reasoning and the competence-performance issue: A developmental analysis of a training task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 274-290.
27. Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1996). Psychometric intelligence and aging. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. M. Hess (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging (pp. 293-322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
29. Stanovich, K. E. (2003). The fundamental computational biases of human cognition: Heuristics that (sometimes) impair decision making and problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 291-342). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342-357.
31. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998a). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188.
32. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998b). Cognitive ability and variation in selection task performance. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 193-230.
33. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
34. Thompson, V. A. (1994). Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 742-758.
35. Thompson, V. A. (1995). Conditional reasoning: The necessary and sufficient conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 1-60.
36. Thompson, V. A. (2000). The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning. Cognition, 76, 209-268.
37. Thurstone, T. G. (1962). Primary mental abilities for grades 9-12. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
38. Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology. Harmondworth, UK: Penguin Books.