Phylogenetics of Pinus Subsections Cembroides and Nelsoniae Inferred from cpDNA Sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 657-673

  Gernandt, David S ^a   Liston, Aaron ^b   Piñero, Daniel ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; PARRYA; PINUS EDULIS; PINUS MAXIMARTINEZII; PINUS PINCEANA; STROBUS;

EID: 0344961884     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ARCHIE, J. W. 1985. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology 34: 326-345.
2. AXELROD, D. I. 1986. Cenozoic history of some western American pines. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 565-641.
3. BAILEY, D. K. 1983. A new allopatric segregate from and a new combination in Pinus cembroides Zucc. at its southern limits. Phytologia 54: 89-100.
4. _ and F. G. HAWKSWORTH. 1979. Pinyons of the Chihuahuan desert region. Phytologia 44: 129-133.
5. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
6. BROWER, A. V. Z. 1999. Delimitation of phylogenetic species with DNA sequences: a critique of Davis and Nixon's population aggregation analysis. Systematic Biology 48: 199-213.
7. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
8. DUHAMEL DU MONCEAU, M. 1755. Traité des arbres et arbustes qui se cultivent en France en pleine terre. Volume 2. Paris: Chez H. L. Guerin & L. F. Delatour.
9. FARJON, A. 1996. Biodiversity of Pinus (Pinaceae) in Mexico: speciation and palaeo-endemism. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 365-384.
10. _ and B. T. STYLES. 1997. Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotrapica monograph 75. Bronx: The New York Botanical Garden.
11. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. GADEK, P. A., D. L. ALPERS, M. M. HESLEWOOD, and C. J. QUINN. 2000. Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: a combined morphological and molecular approach. American Journal of Botany 87: 1044-1057.
14. GEADA LÓPEZ, G., K. KAMIYA, and K. HARADA. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Diploxylon pines (subgenus Pinus) based on plastid sequence data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 737-747.
15. GERNANDT, D. S., A. LISTON, and D. PIÑERO. 2001. Variation in the nrDNA ITS of Pinus subsection Cembroides: implications for molecular systematic studies of pine species complexes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 449-467.
16. GRAHAM, A. 1999. The Tertiary history of the northern temperate element in the northern Latin American biota. American Journal of Botany 86: 32-38.
17. GREUTER, W., J. MCNEILL, F. R. BARRIE, H.-M. BURDET, V. DEMOULIN, T. S. FILGUEIRAS, D. H. NICOLSON, P. C. SILVA, J. E. SKOG, P. TREHANE, N. J. TURLAND, and D. L. HAWKSWORTH. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code). Regnum Vegetabile 131. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
18. HALL, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series2E 41: 95-98.
19. HILLIS, D. M. and J. J. WIENS. 2000. Molecules versus morphology in systematics: conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. Pp. 1-20 in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data, ed. J. Wiens. Washington DC.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
20. HUDSON, R. H. 1960. The anatomy of the genus Pinus in relation to its classification. Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 6: 26-46.
21. KELCHNER, S. A. and J. F. WENDEL. 1996. Hairpins create minute inversions in non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Current Genetics 30: 259-262.
22. KOEHNE, E. 1893. Deutsche dendrologie. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
23. LANNER, R. M. 1974. A new pine from Baja California and the hybrid origin of Pinus quadrifolia. Southwestern Naturalist 19: 75-95.
24. _. 1981. The piñon pine: a natural and cultural history. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
25. LI, X.-W. 1992. A new series and a new species of Pinus from Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 14: 259-260.
26. LISTON, A., W. A. ROBINSON, D. PIÑERO, and E. R. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 95-109.
27. _, D. S. GERNANDT, T. F. VINING, C. S. CAMPBELL, and D. PIÑERO. In press. Molecular phylogeny of Pinaceae and Pinus. In Proceedings of the International Conifer Conference. Acta Horticulturae.
28. LITTLE, E. L. JR. 1966. A new pinyon variety from Texas. Wrightia 3: 181-187.
29. _. 1968. Two new pinyon varieties from Arizona. Phytologia 17: 329-342.
30. _ and W. B. CRITCHFIELD. 1969. Subdivisions of the genus Pinus. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 1144.
31. MALUSA, J. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of the pinyon pines (Pinus subsect. Cembroides). Systematic Botany 17: 42-66.
32. MCCRACKEN, K. G., J. HARSHMAN, D. A. MCCLELLAN, and A. D. AFTON. 1999. Data set incongruence and correlated character evolution: an example of functional convergence in the hind-limbs of stifftail diving ducks. Systematic Biology 48: 683-714.
33. MEIJER, J. J. F. 2000. Fossil woods from the Late Cretaceous Aachen Formation. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 112: 297-336.
34. MILLAR, C. I. 1998. Early evolution of pines. Pp. 69-91 in Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, ed. D. M. Richardson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. NEALE, D. B. and R. R. SEDEROFF. 1989. Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA and maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in loblolly pine. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77: 212-216.
36. OLMSTEAD, R. G., H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, and J. D. PALMER. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
37. ORTIZ-GARCÍA, S. 1999. Evolución y filogenia en pinos y sus hongos endófitos: aspectos sistemáticos de la coespeciación. Ph.D. thesis, Institúto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
38. PASSINI, M.-F. 1987. The endemic pinyon of lower California Pinus lagunae M-F. Passini. Phytologia 63: 337-338.
39. _. 1994. Synonymie entre Pinus discolor Bailey & Hawksworth et Pinus johannis M. F. Robert. Acta Botanica Gallica 3: 387-388.
40. PEREZ DE LA ROSA, J., S. A. HARRIS, and A. FARJON. 1995. Non-coding chloroplast DNA variation in Mexican pines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 1101-1106.
41. PERRY, J. P. JR. 1991. The pines of Mexico and Central America. Portland: Timber Press.
42. PIMENTEL, R. A. and R. RIGGINS. 1987. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3: 201-209.
43. PRICE, R. A., A. LISTON, and S. H. STRAUSS, 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. Pp. 49-68 in Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, ed. D. M. Richardson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. ROBERT-PASSINI, M.-F. 1978. Un nouveau pin pignon mexicaine: Pinus johannis Robert. Adansonia, sér. 2, 18: 365-373.
45. _. 1981. Deux nouveaux pins pignons du Mexique. Adansonia 1: 61-73.
46. ROMERO, A., M. LUNA, E. GARCÍA, and M. F. PASSINI. 2000. Phenetic analysis of the Mexican midland pinyon pines, Pinus cembroides and Pinus johannis. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 181-194.
47. SAVOLAINEN, V., M. W. CHASE, S. B. HOOT, C. M. MORTON, D. E. SOLTIS, C. BAYER, M. F. FAY, A. Y. DE BRUIJN, S. SULLIVAN, and Y.-L. QIU. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306-362.
48. SHAW, G. R. 1909. The pines of Mexico. Publications of the Arnold Arboretum No. 1. Boston: J. R. Ruiter & Co.
49. _. 1914. The genus Pinus. Publications of the Arnold Arboretum No. 5. Cambridge, Massachussets: The Riverside Press.
50. SOLTIS, D. E. and P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. Pp.1-42 in Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, eds. D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. STEELE, K. P. and R. VILGALYS. 1994. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
52. STRAUSS, S. H. and A. H. DOERKSEN. 1990. Restriction fragment analysis of pine phylogeny. Evolution 44: 1081-1096.
53. STYLES, B. T. 1993. Genus Pinus: a Mexican purview. Pp. 397-420 in Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution, eds. T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
55. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
56. TIFFNEY, B. H. and S. R. MANCHESTER. 2001. The use of geological and paleontological evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the northern hemisphere Tertiary. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S3-S17.
57. VAN DER BURGH, J. 1973. Hölzer der niederrheinischen Braunkohlenformation, 2. Hölzer der Braunkohlengruben "Maria Theresia" zu Herzogenrath, "Zukunft West" zu Eschweiler und "Victor" (Zülpich Mitte) zu Zulpich. Nebst einer systematisch-anatomischen Bearbeitung der Gattung Pinus L. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 15: 73-275.
58. WAKASUGI, T., J. TSUDZUKI, S. ITO, K. NAKASHIMA, T. TSUDZUIKI, and M. SUGIURA. 1994. Loss of all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 9794-9798.
59. WANG, X.-R., A. E. SZMIDT, and H. N. NGUYÊN. 2000. The phylogenetic position of the endemic flat-needle pine, Pinus krempfii (Pinaceae) from Vietnam, based on PCR-RFLP analysis of chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 220: 21-36.
60. _, Y. TSUMURA, H. YOSHMARU, K. NAGASAKA, and A. E. SZMIDT. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Eurasian pines (Pinus, Pinaceae) based on chloroplast rbcL, matK, rpl20-rps18 spacer, and trnV intron sequences. American Journal of Botany 86: 1742-1753.
61. WOLFE, J. A. and H. E. SCHORN. 1990. Taxonomic revision of the Spermatopsida of the Oligocene Creede flora, southern Colorado. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1923: 1-40.
62. ZAVARIN, E. and K. SNAJBERK. 1987. Monoterpene differentiation in relation to the morphology of Pinus culminicola, Pinus nelsonii, Pinus pinceana and Pinus maximartinezii. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 15: 307-312.
63. _, and L. COOL. 1990. Chemical differentiation in relation to the morphology of the single-needle pinyons. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 18: 125-137.
64. ZHANG, Z.-Y., J.-B. YANG, and D.-Z. LI. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the extremely endangered species, Pinus squamata (Pinaceae) inferred from four sequences of the chloroplast genome and ITS of the nuclear genome. Acta Botanica Sinica. 45: 530-535.