Phylogenetic analysis of the hard pines (Pinus subgenus Pinus, Pinaceae) from chloroplast DNA restriction site analysis

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 489-498

  Krupkin, A B ^a   Liston, A ^a   Strauss, S H ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chloroplast DNA restriction site analysis; Phylogenetic analysis; Pinaceae; Pines, hard; Pinus contorta

Indexed keywords

ABIES; PINACEAE; PINUS (SUBGENUS); PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS RADIATA; PINUS RESINOSA; PINUS TAEDA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 0001048510     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2446218     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ALVIN, K. L. 1960. Further conifers of the Pinaceae from the Wealden Formation of Belgium. Memorial Institute of Research Science National Belgium 146: 1-39.
2. AXELROD, D. I. 1980. History of the maritime closed-coned pines, Alta and Baja California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, University of California Press 120: 1-143.
3. _. 1986. Cenozoic history of some western American pines. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 565-641.
4. _. 1987. The late Oligocene Creede flora, Colorado. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, University of California Press 129: 1-235.
5. AXELROD, D. I., AND J. COTA. 1993. A further contribution to closedcone pine (Oocarpae) history. American Journal of Botany 80: 743-751.
6. BOUSQUET, J., S. H. STRAUSS, A. H. DOERKSEN, AND R. A. PRICE. 1992. Extensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene sequences among seed plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89: 7844-7848.
7. CONKLE, M. T., G. SCHILLER, AND C. GRUNWALD. 1988. Electrophoretic analysis of diversity and phylogeny of Pinus brutia and closely related taxa. Systematic Botany 13: 411-424.
8. CRITCHFIELD, W. B. 1966. Crossability and relationships of the California big-cone pines. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research Paper NC-6: 36-44.
9. _. 1967. Crossability and relationships of the California closed coned pines. Silvae Genetica 16: 89-97.
10. _. 1985. The late Quaternary history of lodgepole and jack pines. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 15: 749-772.
11. CRITCHFIELD, W. B., AND E. L. LITTLE JR. 1966. Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. (Miscellaneous Publication 991).
12. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
13. DUFFIELD, J. W. 1952. Relationships and species hybridization in the genus Pinus. Zie Forstgenetica Forstpflanzenzuechten 1: 93-97.
14. ERDTMAN, H., B. KIMLAND, AND T. NORIN. 1966. Pine phenolics and pine classification. Botanical Magazine 79: 499-505.
15. FARJON, A. 1984. Pines: drawings and descriptions of the genus. E.J Brill and W. Backhuys, Leiden.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-91.
17. _. 1990. PHYLIP, phylogeny inference package, version 3.3. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
18. GOVINDARAJU, D., P. LEWIS, AND C. CULLIS. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of pines using ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 179: 141-153.
19. HALLER, J. R. 1994. Book review: the pines of Mexico and Central America. Madroño 41: 66-68.
20. HEDGES, S. B. 1992. The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap P-value in phylogenetic studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9: 366-369.
21. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
22. _, AND C. MORITZ. 1990. An overview of applications of molecular systematics. In D.M. Hillis and C. Moritz, [eds.] Molecular Systematics, 502-515. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
23. HONG, Y.-P, V. D. HIPKINS, AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1993. Chloroplast DNA diversity among trees, populations and species of California Closed-Cone pines (Pinus radiata, Pinus muricata, and Pinus attenuata). Genetics 135: 1187-1196.
24. _, A. B. KRUPKIN, AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1993. Chloroplast DNA transgresses species boundaries and evolves at variable rates in the California Closed-Cone pines (P. radiata, P. muricata, and P. attenuata). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2: 322-329.
25. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1994. Comparing the stratigraphie record to estimates of phylogeny. Paleobiology 20: 470-483.
26. KARALAMANGALA, R. P., AND D. L. NICKRENT. 1989. An electrophoretic study of representatives of subgenus Diploxylon of Pinus. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1750-1759.
27. KLAUS, W. 1989. Mediterranean pines and their history. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 133-163.
28. KOSSACK, D. S. 1989. The IFG copia-like element. Characterization of a transposable element present at high copy number in the genus Pinus and a history of the pines using IFG as a marker. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis, CA.
29. KRAL, R. 1993. Pinus In N. R. Morin [ed.], Flora of North America, vol. 2, 373-398. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. KRUPKIN, A. B. 1992. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of hard pines (subgenus Pinus): Inference from site mutations and mutliple small (1-10 kb) inversions. Master's thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
31. KRUTOVSKII, K. V., D. V. POLITOV, AND YU. P. ALTUKHOV. 1994. Genetic differentiation and phylogeny of stone pine species based on isozyme loci. In W. C. Schmidt and F.-K. Holtmeier [compilers]. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Subalpine Stone Pines and Their Environment: The Status of Our Knowledge, 19-30. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, General Technical Report INT-GTR-309.
32. LI, W.-H., AND D. GRAUR. 1991. Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
33. LIDHOLM, J., AND P. GUSTAFSSON. 1991. The Chloroplast genome of the gymnosperm Pinus contorta: a physical map and a complete collection of overlapping clones. Current Genetics 20: 161-166.
34. LITTLE, E. L., JR., AND W. B. CRITCHFIELD. 1969. Subdivisions of the genus Pinus (pines). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. (Miscellaneous Publication 1144).
35. MALUSA, J. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of the pinyon pines (Pinus subsect. Cembroides). Systematic Botany 17: 42-66.
36. MILLAR, C. I. 1993. Impact of the Eocene on the evolution of Pinus L. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 471-498.
37. _, S. H. STRAUSS, M. T. CONKLE, AND R. D. WESTFALL. 1988. Allozyme differentiation and biosystematics of the California closed coned pines (Pinus subsection Oocarpae). Systematic Botany 13: 351-370.
38. MIROV, N. T. 1967. The genus Pinus. Ronald Press, New York, NY.
39. MORAN, G. F., D. SMITH, J. C. BELL, AND R. APPELS. 1992. The 5S RNA genes in Pinus radiata and the spacer region as a probe for relationships between Pinus species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 183: 209-221.
40. NEI, M., AND F. TAJIMA. 1983. Maximum likelihood estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions from restriction sites data. Genetics 105: 207-217.
41. PERRY, J. P. J. 1991. The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
42. PIOVESAN, G., C. PELOSI, A. SCHIRONE, AND B. SCHIRONE. 1993. Taxonomic evaluations of the genus Pinus (Pinaceae) based on electrophoretic data of salt soluble and insoluble seed storage proteins. Plant Systematics and Evolution 186: 57-68.
43. PRAGER, E. M., D. R FOWLER, AND A. C. WILSON. 1976. Rates of evolution in conifers (Pinaceae). Evolution 30: 637-649.
44. PRICE, R. A. 1989. The genera of Pinaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 70: 247-305.
45. _, J. OLSEN-STOJKOVICH, AND J. M. LOWENSTEIN. 1987. Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: an immunological comparison. Systematic Botany 12: 91-97.
46. RIESEBERG, L. H., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 5: 65-84.
47. SANDERSON, M. J. 1989. Confidence limits on phylogenies: the bootstrap revisited. Cladistics 5: 113-129.
48. SAYLOR, L. C. 1972. Karyotype analysis of the genus Pinus-subgenus Pinus. Silvae Genetica 21: 155-163.
49. _. 1983. Karyotype analysis of the genus Pinus - subgenus Strobus. Silvae Genetica 32: 119-1124.
50. _, AND R. L. KOENIG. 1967. The slash × sand pine hybrid. Silvae Genetica 16: 134-138.
51. SCHIRONE, B., G. PIOVESAN, R. BELLAROSA, AND C. PELOSI. 1991. A taxonomic analysis of seed proteins in Pinus spp. (Pinaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 178: 43-53.
52. SHAW, G. R. 1914. The genus Pinus. Arnold Arboretum, no. 5. Riverside Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. SHURKHAL, A. V., A. V. PODOGAS, AND L. A. ZHIVOTOSKY. 1992. Allozyme differentiation in the genus Pinus. Silvae Genetica 41: 105-109.
54. STOCKEY, R. A., AND M. NISHIDA. 1986. Pinus harborensis sp. nov. and affinities of permineralized leaves from the Upper Cretaceous of Japan. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 1856-1866.
55. STRAUSS, S. H., AND A. H. DOERKSEN. 1990. Restriction fragment analysis of pine phylogeny. Evolution 44: 1081-1096.
56. _, J.D. PALMER, G. HOWE, AND A. DOERKSEN. 1988. Chloroplast genomes of two conifers lack a large inverted repeat and are extensively rearranged. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 85:3898-3902.
57. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
58. TSAI, C.-H., AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1989. Dispersed repetitive sequences in the chloroplast genome of Douglas-fir. Current Genetics 16: 211-218.
59. VAN DER BURGH, J. 1973. HÖlzer der niederrheinischen Braunkohlen-formation, 2. HÖlzer der Braunkohlengruben "Maria Theresia" zu Herzogenrath, "Zukunft West" zu Eschweiler und "Victor" (Zülpich Mitte) zu Zülpich. Nebst einer systematisch-anatomischen Bearbeitung der Gattung Pinus L. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 15: 73-275.
60. WAGNER, D. B., W. L. NANCE, C. D. NELSON, T. LI, R. N. PATEL, AND D. R. GOVINDARAJU. 1992. Taxonomic patterns and inheritance of chloroplast DNA variation in a survey of Pinus echinata, Pinus elliottii, Pinus palustris, and Pinus taeda. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 22: 683-689.
61. WANG, X.-R., AND A. E. SZMIDT. 1993. Chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of Asian Pinus species (Pinaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 188: 197-211.
62. WHEELER, N. C., R. P. GLIRIES, AND D. M. O'MALLEY. 1983. Biosystematics of the genus Pinus, Subsection Contortae. Biochemical and Systematic Ecology 11: 333-340.
63. WILSON, M. A., B. GAUT, AND M. T. CLEGG. 1990. Chloroplast DNA evolves slowly in the palm family (Arecaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 7: 303-314.
64. WOLFE, J. A., AND H. E. SCHORN. 1990. Taxonomic revision of the Spermatopsida of the Oligocene Creede Flora, Southern Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1923: 1-67.
65. WOLFE, K. H., W. -H. LI, AND P. M. SHARP. 1987. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 84: 9054-9058.
66. ZOBEL, B. 1951. The natural hybrid between Coulter and Jeffrey pines. Evolution 5: