Phylogenetics ofPinus(Pinaceae) Based on Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Region Sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 95-109

  Liston, Aaron ^a   Robinson, William A ^a   Piñero, Daniel ^b   Alvarez Buylla, Elena R ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UMAM   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 5.8S;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICS; TREE;

DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5.8S; STATISTICS; TREES;

EID: 0033073029     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0550     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Andresen J. W. The taxonomic status ofPinus chiapensis. Phytologia. 10:1964;417-421.
2. Andresen J. W. A multivariate analysis of thePinus chiapensis-monticola-strobus. Rhodora. 68:1966;1-24.
3. Baldwin B. G., Sanderson M. J., Porter J. M., Wojciechowski M. F., Campbell C. S., Donoghue M. J. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:1995;247-277.
4. Bogler D. J., Simpson B. B. Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ITS rDNA sequence variation. Amer. J. Bot. 83:1996;1225-1235.
5. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution. 42:1988;795-803.
6. Buchholz J. T. A flat-leaved pine from Annam, Indo-China. Amer. J. Bot. 38:1951;245-252.
7. Carvajal S., McVaugh R. Pinus. Flora Novo-Galiciana: A Descriptive Account of the Vascular Plants of Western Mexico. 1992;The University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann Arbor. p. 32-100.
8. Chase M. W., Soltis D. E., Olmstead R. G., Morgan D., Les D. H., Mishler B. D., Duvall M. R., Price R. A., Hills H. G., Qiu Y.-L., Kron K. A., Retting J. H., Conti E., Palmer J. D., Manhart J. R., Sytsma K. J., Michaels H. J., Kress W. J., Karol K. G., Clark W. D., Hedren M., Gaut B. S., Jansen R. K., Kim K.-J., Wimpee C. F., Smith J. F., Furnier G. R., Strauss S. H., Xiang Q.-Y., Plunkett G. M., Soltis P. S., Swensen S. M., Williams S. E., Gadek P. A., Quinn C. J., Eguiarte L. E., Golenberg E., Learn G. H. J., Graham S. W., Barrett S. C. H., Dayanandan S., Albert V. A. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbc. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:1993;528-580.
9. Chaw S.-M., Zharkikh A., Sung H.-M., Leu T.-C., Li W.-H. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: Analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;56-68.
10. Chevalier A. Notes sur les Coniféres de l'Indochine. Rev. Bot. Appl. Agric. Tropicale. 24:1944;7-34.
11. Critchfield W. B. Hybridization and classification of the white pines (PinusStrobus. Taxon. 35:1986;647-656.
12. Critchfield, W. B. Little, E. L. Jr. 1966, Geographic Distribution of the Pines of the World, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
13. de Ferré Y. Une nouvelle espèce de pin au Viet-Nam:Pinus dalatensis. Bull. Soc. Nat. Hist. Toulouse. 95:1960;171-180.
14. de Ferré Y. Validité de l'espècePinus pumila. Bull. Soc. Nat. Hist. Toulouse. 102:1966;351-356.
15. Doyle J. J. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:1992;144-163.
16. Eernisse D. J., Kluge A. G. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1170-1195.
17. Erdtman H., Kimland B., Norin T. Wood constituents ofDucampopinus krempfiiPinus krempfii. Phytochemistry. 5:1966;927-931.
18. Farjon A. Brill E. J., Backhuys W. Pines: Drawings and Descriptions of the Genus. 1984.
19. Farjon A. Pinaceae: Drawings and descriptions of the genera. Regnum Vegetabile. 121:1990;1-330.
20. Farjon A. Biodiversity ofPinus. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121:1996;365-384.
21. Farjon, A. Styles, B. T. 1997, Pinus., New York Botanical Garden, NY.
22. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
23. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
24. Frankis M. P. Generic interrelationships in Pinaceae. Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh. 45:1988;527-548.
25. Frankis M. P. Morphology and affinities ofPinus brutia. International Symposium onPinus brutia. 1993;Ministry of Forestry, Ankara. p. 11-18.
26. Gaussen H. Pinus. Les gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles, Tome II. 1960;Travaux du Laboratorie Forestier de Toulouse, Toulouse. p. 1-272.
27. Genetics Computer Group, 1994, Program Manual for the Wisconsin Package, Madison, WI.
28. Gernandt D. S., Liston A. Internal transcribed spacer region evolution inLarixPseudotsuga. Amer. J. Bot. in press.
29. Govindaraju D., Lewis P., Cullis C. Phylogenetic analysis of pines using ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Plant Syst. Evol. 179:1992;141-153.
30. Hart J. A cladistic analysis of conifers: Preliminary results. J. Arnold Arbor. 68:1987;269-307.
31. Hershkovitz M. A., Lewis L. A. Deep-level diagnostic value of the rDNA-ITS region. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;1276-1295.
32. Hershkovitz M. A., Zimmer E. A. Conservation patterns in angiosperm rDNA ITS2 sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1996;2857-2867.
33. Hillis D. M., Bull J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;182-192.
34. Hoff R. J., Hagle S. K., Krebill R. G. Genetic consequences and research challenges of blister rust in whitebark pine forests. Schmidt W. C., Holtmeier F.-K. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Subalpine Stone Pines and Their Environment: The Status of Our Knowledge. 1994;118-126 USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden.
35. Holmgren P. K., Holmgren N. H., Barnett L. C. Index Herbariorum Part I: The Herbaria of the World. 1990;New York Botanical Garden, New York.
36. Hudson R. H. The anatomy of the genusPinus. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 6:1960;26-46.
37. Ickert-Bond S. M. Pinus krempfii. Amer. J. Bot. 84:1997;203.
38. Johnson L. A., Soltis D. E. mat. Syst. Bot. 19:1994;13-156.
39. Karvonen P., Savolainen O. Variation and inheritance of ribosomal DNA inPinus sylvestris. Heredity. 71:1993;614-622.
40. Karvonen P., Karjalainen M., Savolainen O. Ribosomal RNA genes in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris. Genetica. 88:1993;59-68.
41. Klaus W. Mediterranean pines and their history. Plant Syst. Evol. 162:1989;133-163.
42. Klein A. S., Smith D. E. Erratum: Phylogenetic inferences on the relationship of North American and EuropeanPicea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:1996;286-287.
43. Krupkin A. B., Liston A., Strauss S. H. Phylogenetic analysis of the hard pines (PinusPinus. Amer. J. Bot. 83:1996;489-498.
44. Krutovskii K. V., Politov D. V., Altukhov Y. P. Isozyme study of population genetic structure, mating system and phylogenetic relationships of the five stone pine species (subsectionCembrae,Strobi,Strobus. Baradat P., Adams W. T., Müller-Starck G. Population Genetics and Genetic Conservation of Forest Trees. 1995;279-304 SBP Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
45. Lanner R. M. Biology, taxonomy, evolution, and geography of stone pines of the world. Schmidt W. C., McDonald K. J. Proceedings of the Symposium on Whitebark Pine Ecosystems: Ecology and Management of a High-Mountain Resource. 1990;14-24 USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-270, Ogden.
46. Lanner R. M. Made For Each Other. A Symbiosis of Birds and Pines. 1996;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
47. Lidholm J., Gustafsson P. The chloroplast genome of the gymnospermPinus contorta: Curr. Genet. 20:1991;161-166.
48. Liston A. Biogeographic relationships between the Mediterranean and North America flora: Insights from molecular data. Lagascalia. 19:1997;323-330.
49. Liston A., Robinson W. A., Oliphant J. M., Alvarez-Buylla E. R. Length variation in the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region of non-flowering seed plants. Syst. Bot. 21:1996;109-120.
50. Little, E. L. Jr. Critchfield, W. B. 1969, Subdivisions of the GenusPinus, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
51. Malusa J. Phylogeny and biogeography of the pinyon pines (PinusCembroides. Syst. Bot. 17:1992;42-66.
52. Marrocco R., Gelati M. T., Maggini F. Nucleotide sequence of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S region of ribosomal DNA inPinus pinea. DNA Sequence. 6:1996;175-177.
53. Martin P. S., Harrell B. E. The Pleistocene history of temperate biotas in Mexico and eastern United States. Ecology. 38:1957;468-480.
54. Martínez M. Los Pinos Mexicanos. 1948;Ediciones Botas, Mexico City.
55. Mattes H. Coevolutionary aspects of stone pines and nutcrackers. Schmidt W. C., Holtmeier F.-K. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Subalpine Stone Pines and Their Environment: The Status of Our Knowledge. 1994;31-35 USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden.
56. Millar C. I. Impact of the Eocene on the evolution ofPinus. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:1993;471-498.
57. Mirov N. T. The GenusPinus, 1967;Ronald Press, New York.
58. Morgan D. R. Decay analysis of large sets of phylogenetic data. Taxon. 46:1997;509-517.
59. Nickrent D. L., Schuette K. P., Starr E. M. A molecular phylogeny ofArceuthobium. Amer. J. Bot. 81:1994;1149-1160.
60. Norton D. A., Carpenter M. A. Mistletoes as parasites: Host specificity and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:1998;101-104.
61. Ortiz-García S., Seitz V., Alvarez-Buylla E. R., Piñero D., Robinson W. A., Liston A. Separate and combined phylogenetic analyses of morphological and ITS data inPinus. Amer. J. Bot. 84:1997;221.
62. Page R. D. M. TREEVIEW: An application to view phylogenetic trees on personal computers. CABIOS. 12:1996;357-358.
63. Perez de la Rosa J., Harris S. A., Farjon A. Noncoding chloroplast DNA variation in Mexican pines. Theor. App. Genet. 91:1995;1101-1106.
64. Perry J. P. J. The Pines of Mexico and Central America. 1991;Timber Press, Portland.
65. Price R. A. The genera of Pinaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 70:1989;247-305.
66. Price R. A., Liston A., Strauss S. H. Phylogeny and systematics ofPinus. Richardson D. M. Ecology and Biogeography ofPinus. 1998;49-68 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
67. Quijada A., Liston A., Robinson W. A., Alvarez-Buylla E. The ITS region as a marker to detect hybridization in pines. Mol. Ecol. 6:1997;995-996.
68. Rieseberg L. H., Soltis D. E. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Plants. 5:1991;65-84.
69. Rushforth K. Conifers. 1987;Helm, London.
70. Sanderson M. J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: The bootstrap revisited. Cladistics. 5:1989;113-129.
71. Sato T. Multivariate analysis of needle size and its anatomical traits ofPinus. J. Jpn. Bot. 70:1995;253-259.
72. Saylor L. C., Koenig R. L. The slash × sand pine hybrid. Silvae Genetica. 16:1967;134-138.
73. Smith S. W., Overbeek R., Woese C. R., Gilbert W., Gillevet P. M. The genetic data environment: An expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis. CABIOS. 10:1994;670-671.
74. Soltis D. E., Johnson L. A., Looney C. Discordance between ITS and chloroplast topologies in theBoykinia. Syst. Bot. 21:1996;169-185.
75. Strauss S. H., Doerksen A. H. Restriction fragment analysis of pine phylogeny. Evolution. 44:1990;1081-1096.
76. Styles B. T. GenusPinus: Ramamoorthy T. P., Bye R., Lot A., Fa J. Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. 1993;397-420 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
77. Swofford D. L., Olsen G. J., Waddell P. J., Hillis D. M. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis D. M., Mable B. K., Moritz C. Molecular Systematics. 1996;407-514 Sinauer, Sunderland.
78. Tomback D. F., Linhart Y. B. The evolution of bird-dispersed pines. Evol. Ecol. 4:1990;185-219.
79. Van der Burgh J. Hölzer der niederrheinischen Braunkohlenformation, 2. Hölzer der Braunkohlengruben "Maria Theresia" zu Herzogenrath, "Zukunft West" zu Eschweiler und "Victor" (Zülpich Mitte) zu Zülpich. Nebst einer systematisch-anatomischen Bearbeitung der GattungPinus. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 15:1973;73-275.
80. Vidakoviç M. Conifers: Morphology and Variation. 1991;Graficki Zavod Hrvatske, Zagreb.
81. Wang X.-R., Szmidt A. E. Chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of AsianPinus. Plant Syst. Evol. 188:1993;197-211.
82. Watano Y., Imazu M., Shimizu T. Chloroplast DNA typing by PCR-SSCP in thePinus pumila-P. parviflorapentaphylla. J. Plant Res. 108:1995;493-499.
83. Wheeler W. C., Gatesy J., DeSalle R. Elision: A method for accomodating multiple molecular sequence alignments with alignment-ambiguous sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:1995;1-9.