A polarity effect in misoriented object recognition: The role of polar features in the computation of orientation-invariant shape representations

Visual Cognition

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 573-600

  Leek, E Charles ^a   Johnston, Stephen J ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 31544460991     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280544000048     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Arguin, M., Leek, E. C. Mental rotation for visual object recognition: Identical rates in priming and picture naming Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, (1995); 36: 473
2. Arguin, M., Leek, E. C.Orientation-dependence in visual object recognition: Further evidence from repetition priming and picture naming Perception and Psychophysics, (2003); 65: 469-477
3. Bethel-Fox, C. E., Shepard, R. N.Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1988); 14: 12-23
4. Biederman, I., Bar, M.One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects Vision Research, (1999); 39: 2885-2899
5. Biederman, I., Cooper, E. E.Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming Perception, (1991); 20: 585-593
6. Biederman, I., Gerhardstein, P. C.Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1993); 19: 1162-1182
7. Biederman, I., Gerhardstein, P. C.Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object identification: Reply to Tarr and Bulthoff (1995) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1995); 19: 1162-1182
8. Cohen, D., Kubovy, M.Mental rotation, mental representation, and flat slopes Cognitive Psychology, (1993); 25: 351-382
9. Corballis, M. C.Recognition of disoriented shapes Psychological Review, (1988); 95: 115-123
10. Corballis, M. C., Cullen, S.Decisions about the axes of disoriented shapes Memory and Cognition, (1986); 14: 27-38
11. Corballis, M. C., Nagourney, B. A.Latency to categorize disoriented alphanumeric characters as letters or digits Canadian Journal of Psychology, (1978); 32: 186-188
12. Corballis, M. C., Zbrodoff, N. J., Shetzer, L. I., Butler, P. B.Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits Memory and Cognition, (1978); 6: 98-107
13. DeCaro, S. A., Reeves, A.Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: Evidence from backward-masking/dual-task procedure Perception and Psychophysics, (2000); 62: 1356-1366
14. DeCaro, S. A., Reeves, A.The use of word-picture verification to study entry-level object recognition: Further support for view-invariant mechanisms Memory and Cognition, (2002); 30: 811-821
15. Dickerson, J., Humphreys, G. W.On the identification of misoriented objects: Effects of task and level of stimulus description European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, (1999); 11: 145-166
16. Edelman, S.Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in the recognition of 3D objects Biological Cybernetics, (1995); 72: 207-220
17. Eley, M. G.Identifying rotated letter-like symbols Memory and Cognition, (1982); 10: 25-32
18. Hamm, J. P., McMullen, P. A.Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1998); 24: 413-426
19. Harris, I. M., Dux, P. E.Orientation-invariant object recognition: Evidence from repetition-blindness Cognition, (2005); 95: 73-93
20. Hayward, W. G.After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (2003); 7: 425-427
21. Hayward, W. G., Williams, P.Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability Psychological Science, (2000); 11: 7-12
22. Hinton, G. E., Parsons, L. M.Frames of reference and mental imagery Attention and performance IX, (1981); In A. Baddeley & J. Long (Eds.)Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Howard, I. P.Visual orientation. (1982); London. John Wiley
24. Howard, I. P., Templeton, W. B.Human spatial orientation. (1966); London. John Wiley
25. Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P.Priming effects between two-dimensional shapes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1988); 14: 203-220
26. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J.Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (1984); 36A: 385-415
27. Jolicoeur, P.The time to name disoriented natural objects Memory and Cognition, (1985); 13: 289-303
28. Jolicoeur, P.On the role of mental rotation and feature extraction in the identification of disoriented objects: A dual systems theory Mind and Language, (1990); 5: 387-410
29. Jolicoeur, P., Humphrey, G. K.Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes Perceptual constancy, (1998); In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.)Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
30. Jolicoeur, P., Ingleton, M., Bartram, L., Booth, K. S.Top-bottom and front-behind decisions on rotated objects Canadian Journal of Psychology, (1993); 47: 657-677
31. Jolicoeur, P., Milliken, B.Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (1989); 15: 200-210
32. Large, M.-E., McMullen, P. A., Hamm, J. P.The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming Perception and Psychophysics, (2003); 65: 1-19
33. Lawson, R.Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation Acta Psychologica, (1999); 102: 221-245
34. Lawson, R.Recognising a plane-misoriented view of a familiar object is not influenced by the ease of specifying the main axis of elongation of that object Perception and Psychophysics, (2004); 66: 234-248
35. Leek, E. C.Effects of stimulus orientation on the identification of common polyoriented objects Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, (1998a); 5: 650-658
36. Leek, E. C.The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition Perception, (1998b); 27: 803-816
37. Ling, X., Sanocki, T.Major axes as a moderately abstract model for object recognition Psychological Science, (1995); 6: 370-375
38. Lui, T., Cooper, L. A.The influence of task requirements on priming in object decision and matching Memory and Cognition, (2001); 29: 874-882
39. Maki, R. H.Naming and location the tops of rotated pictures Canadian Journal of Psychology, (1986); 40: 368-387
40. Marr, D., Nishihara, H. K.Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three-dimensional shapes Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, (1978); B207: 187-217
41. McKone, E., Grenfell, T.Orientation invariance in naming rotated objects: Individual differences and repetition priming Perception and Psychophysics, (1999); 61: 1590-1603
42. McMullen, P. A., Farah, M. J.Viewer-centred and object-centred representations in the recognition of naturalistic line drawings Psychological Science, (1991); 2: 275-277
43. McMullen, P. A., Jolicoeur, P.Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1992); 18: 807-820
44. Murray, J. E.Is entry-level recognition viewpoint invariant or viewpoint dependent? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, (1998); 5: 300-304
45. Murray, J. E.Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming Memory and Cognition, (1999); 27: 878-889
46. Murray, J. E., Jolicoeur, P., McMullen, P. A., Ingleton, M.Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects Memory and Cognition, (1993); 21: 604-610
47. Newell, F. N.Stimulus context and view dependence in object recognition Perception, (1998); 27: 47-68
48. Pinker, S.Visual cognition (1984); Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
49. Quinlan, P. T., Humphreys, G. W.Perceptual frames of reference and two-dimensional shape recognition: Further examination of internal axes Perception, (1993); 22: 1343-1364
50. Rock, I.Orientation and form (1973); New York: Academic Press
51. Schyns, P. G.Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information, and their interactions Cognition, (1998); 67: 147-179
52. Sekuler, A. B.Axis of elongation can determine reference frames for object perception Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, (1996); 50: 270-278
53. Sekular, A. B., Swimmer, M. B.Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception Canadian Journal of Psychology, (2000); 54: 42-55
54. Shepard, R. N., Metzler, D.Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1988); 14: 3-11
55. Takano, Y.Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types Cognitive Psychology, (1989); 21: 1-59
56. Tarr, M. J.Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, (1995); 2: 55-82
57. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H.Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine Object recognition in man, monkey and machine, (1998); In M. J. Tarr & H. H. Bülthoff (Eds.)London: MIT Press
58. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinski, M., Blanz, V.To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across viewpoint? Psychological Science, (1997); 8: 282-289
59. Tarr, M. J., Cheng, Y. D.Learning to see faces and objects Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (2003); 7: 23-30
60. Tarr, M. J., Pinker, S.Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape processing Cognitive Psychology, (1989); 21: 233-282
61. Tarr, M. J., Pinker, S.When does human object recognition use a viewer-centred reference frame? Psychological Science, (1990); 1: 253-256
62. Tarr, M. J., Williams, P., Hayward, W. G., Gauthier, I.Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint-dependent Nature Neuroscience, (1998); 1: 275-277
63. Vanrie, J., Willems, B., Wagemans, J.Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features Perception, (2001); 30: 1047-1056
64. Willems, B., Wagemans, J.Matching multicomponent objects from different viewpoints: Mental rotation as normalisation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (2001); 27: 1090-1115
65. Wilson, K. D., Farah, M. J.When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition? Cognitive Brain Research, (2003); 16: 399-415
66. Wiser, M.The role of intrinsic axes in shape recognition Proceedings of the third annual conference on Cognitive Science, (1981); (pp. 184-186) InMahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
67. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N. L., Shulman, E. P.Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search Vision Research, (1999); 39: 2075-2086