Is entry-level recognition viewpoint invariant or viewpoint dependent?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 300-304

  Murray, Janice E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009930492     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212955     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. EDELMAN, S. (1991). Features of recognition (Tech. Rep. CS-TR10). Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.
2. FARAH, M. J. (1992). Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain-specificity in visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 164-169.
3. HAMM, J. P., & MCMULLEN, P. A. (in press). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
4. JOLICOEUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
5. JOLICOEUR, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
6. JOLICOEUR, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
7. JOLICOEUR, P., GLUCK, M., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (1984). Picture and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 351-364.
8. JOLICOEUR, P., & MILLIKEN, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 200-210.
9. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
10. MCMULLEN, P. A., & JOLICOEUR, P. (1992). The reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the top of rotated objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 807-820.
11. MURRAY, J. E., JOLICOEUR, P., MCMULLEN, P. A., & INGLETON, M. (1993). Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 604-610.
12. ROSCH, E., MERVIS, C. B., GRAY, W. D., JOHNSON, D. M., & BOYES-BRAEM, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
13. SCHNEIDER, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
14. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
15. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
16. TARR, M. J., & BULTHOFF, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
17. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.