Recognizing a plane-misoriented view of a familiar object is not influenced by the ease of specifying the main axis of elongation of that object

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 234-248

  Lawson, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION;

FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2442658276     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194875     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1988). Recognition of misoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
2. CORBALLIS, M. C., ZBRODOFF, N. J., SHETZER, L. I., & BUTLER, P. B. (1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory & Cognition, 6, 98-107.
3. DE CARO, S. A. (1998). On the perception of objects and their orientations. Spatial Vision, 11, 385-400.
4. DE CARO, S. A., & REEVES, A. (2000). Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: Evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1356-1366.
5. DE CARO, S. A., & REEVES, A. (2002). The use of word-picture verification to study entry-level object recognition: Further support for view-invariant mechanisms. Memory & Cognition, 30, 811-821.
6. DELL'ACQUA, R., & JOB, R. (1998). Is object recognition automatic? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 496-503.
7. DELL'ACQUA, R., JOB, R., & GRAINGER, J. (2001). Is global shape sufficient for automatic object identification? Visual Cognition, 8, 801-821.
8. GAUTHIER, I., & TARR, M. J. (1997). Orientation priming of novel shapes in the context of viewpoint-dependent recognition. Perception, 26, 51-73.
9. HAMM, J. P., & MCMULLEN, P. A. (1998). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 413-426.
10. JOLICœUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
11. JOLICœUR, P. (1990). Identification of misoriented objects: A dual systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
12. JOLICœUR, P., CORBALLIS, M. C., & LAWSON, R. (1998). The influence of perceived rotary motion on the recognition of rotated objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 140-146.
13. JOLICœUR, P., & MILLIKEN, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 200-210.
14. LAWSON, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
15. LAWSON, R., & JOLICœUR, P. (1998). The effects of plane rotation on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects. Memory & Cognition, 26, 791-803.
16. LAWSON, R., & JOLICœUR, P. (1999). The effect of prior experience on recognition thresholds for plane-disoriented pictures of familiar objects. Memory & Cognition, 27, 751-758.
17. LAWSON, R., & JOLICœUR, P. (2003). Effects of visual similarity on recognition thresholds for plane-misoriented pictures of familiar objects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 17-41.
18. MARK, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
19. MCMULLEN, P. A., HAMM, J., & JOLICœUR, P. (1995). Rotated object identification with and without orientation cues. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 133-149.
20. MURRAY, J. E. (1998). Is entry-level recognition viewpoint invariant or viewpoint dependent? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 300-304.
21. SANOCKI, T. (1999). Constructing structural descriptions. Visual Cognition, 6, 299-318.
22. SEKULER, A. B., & SWIMMER, M. B. (2000). Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 42-55.
23. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 174-215.