Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 878-889

  Murray, Janice E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; ROTATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0032716993     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03198540     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BARTRAM, D. J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 4, 593-602.
2. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 121-133.
4. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
5. BOUCART, M., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Selection by color and form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 136-153.
6. BOUCART, M., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & LORENCEAU, J. (1995). Automatic access to object identity: Global information, not particular physical dimensions is important. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 584-601.
7. ELLIS, R., & ALLPORT, D. A. (1986). Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioural study. In A. G. Cohn & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its applications (pp. 245-247). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
8. ELLIS, R., ALLPORT, D. A., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & COLLIS, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 775-796.
9. HUMMEL, J. E., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
10. HUMPHREY, G. K., & LUPKER, S. J. (1993). Codes and operations in picture matching. Psychological Research, 55, 237-247.
11. JOLICOEUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
12. JOLICOEUR, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
13. JOLICOEUR, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
14. JOLICOEUR, P., & MILLIKEN, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 200-210.
15. JOLICOEUR, P., SNOW, D., & MURRAY, J. E. (1987). The time to identify disoriented letters: Effects of practice and font. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 303-316.
16. KORIAT, A., & NORMAN, J. (1988). Frames and images: Sequential effects in mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 93-111.
17. KORIAT, A., NORMAN, J., & KIMCHI, R. (1991). Recognition of rotated letters: Extracting invariance across successive and simultaneous stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 444-457.
18. LAWSON, R. (1994). The effects of viewpoint on object recognition. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Birmingham University, Birmingham, U.K.
19. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1996). Viewpoint-specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 395-416.
20. MAKI, R. H. (1986). Naming and location of tops of rotated pictures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 368-387.
21. MARK, D., & NISHIHARA, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 200, 269-294.
22. MCMULLEN, P. A., & JOLICOEUR, P. (1992). The reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the top of rotated objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 807-820.
23. MURRAY, J. E. (1995a). Imagining and naming rotated natural objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 239-243.
24. MURRAY, J. E. (1995b). Negative priming by rotated objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 534-537.
25. MURRAY, J. E. (1995c). The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects. Memory & Cognition, 23, 49-58.
26. MURRAY, J. E., JOLICOEUR, P., MCMULLEN, P. A., & INGLETON, M. (1993). Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 604-610.
27. SCHNEIDER, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatible. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
28. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
29. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of mental transformations in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
30. TARR, M. J., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
31. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.