Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 2075-2086

  Wolfe, Jeremy M ^a,b   Klempen, Nicole L ^b   Shulman, Elizabeth P ^c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Distractors; Orientation; Targets

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; ROTATION;

EID: 0032891590     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00260-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Carrasco M., Sampedro M.J., Orduna I. Objects can be searched efficiently. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 39(4):1998;S165.
2. Dick M., Ullman S., Sagi D. Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. Science. 237:1987;400-402.
3. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review. 96:1989;433-458.
4. Egeth H.E., Virzi R.A., Garbart H. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 10:1984;32-39.
5. Egeth H.E., Yantis S. Visual Attention: control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology. 48:1997;269-297.
6. Enns J.T., Ochs E.P., Rensink R.A. Vsearch: MacIntosh Software for experiments in visual search. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments and Computers. 22:1990;118-122.
7. Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Scene based properties influence visual search. Science. 247:1990;721-723.
8. Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychological Science. 1(5):1990;323-326.
9. Foster D.H., Ward PA. Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 243:1991;75-81.
10. Foster D.H., Ward P.A. Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 243:1991;75-81.
11. Foster D.H., Ward P.A. Horizontal-vertical filters in early vision predict anomalous line-orientation frequencies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 243:1991;83-86.
12. Heathcote A., Mewhort D.J.K. Representation and selection of relative position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19(3):1993;488-516.
13. Hillstrom A.P., Yantis S. Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics. 55:1994;399-411.
14. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature. 194(Aug 6):1998;575-577.
15. Kahneman D., Treisman A. Changing views of attention and automaticity. Parasuraman R., Davies D.R. Varieties of attention. 1984;2961 Academic, New York.
16. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B. The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;179-219.
17. Kleffner D.A., Ramachandran V.S. On the perception of shape from shading. Perception and Psychophysics. 52(1):1992;18-36.
18. Kwak H., Dagenbach D., Egeth H. Further evidence for a time independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception and Psychophysics. 49(5):1991;473-480.
19. McLeod P., Driver J., Dienes Z., Crisp J. Filtering by movement in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17(1):1991;55-64.
20. Nagy A.L., Sanchez R.R. Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 7(7):1990;1209-1217.
21. Nothdurft H.C. The role of features in preattentive vision: comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research. 33(14):1993;1937-1958.
22. Nothdurft H.C. Faces and facial expression do not pop-out. Perception. 22:1993;1287-1298.
23. Ponte D., Rechea C., Sampedro M.J., Carrasco M. A color×color conjunction can be searched in parallel. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38(4):1997;S365.
24. Purcell D.G., Stewart A.L., Skov R.B. It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception. 25(9):1996;1091-1108.
25. Ramachandran V.S. Perception of shape from shading. Nature. 331:1988;163-165.
26. Reinitz M.T., Morrissey J., Demb J. Role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 20(1):1994;161-168.
27. Rensink R.A., Enns J.T. Pre-emption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review. 102(1):1995;101-130.
28. Simmons D.R., Foster D.H. Segmenting textures of curved-line elements. Orban G.A., Nagel H.H. Artificial and biological vision systems. 1992;MS Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. Sun J., Perona P. Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system. Nature. 379(11 Jan):1996;165-168.
30. Sun J., Perona P. Where is the sun? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37(3):1996;935.
31. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: an object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21(4):1995;901-913.
32. Tipper S.P., Weaver B. The medium of attention: Location-based, object-based, or scene-based? Wright R.D. Visual attention. 8:1998;Oxford University, Oxford.
33. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Jerreat L.M., Burak A.L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20(3):1994;478-499.
34. Treisman A. Properties, parts, and objects. Boff K.R., Kaufmann L., Thomas J.P. 1 Handbook of human perception and performance. 2:1986;35.1-35.70 Wiley, New York.
35. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
36. Treisman A., Souther J. Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of seperable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 114:1985;285-310.
37. Vecera S.P., Farah M.J. Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123(2):1994;146-160.
38. von Grunau M., Anston C. The detection of gaze direction: a stare-in the-crowd effect. Perception. 24(11):1995;1297-1313.
39. Wolfe J.M. Effortless texture segmentation and parallel visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research. 32(4):1992;757-763.
40. Wolfe J.M. Guided Search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1(2):1994;202-238.
41. Wolfe J.M. Extending Guided Search: why guided search needs a preattentive item map. Kramer A., Cole G.H., Logan G.D. Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. 1996;247-270 American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
42. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. Pashler H. Attention. 1998;13-74 Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK.
43. Wolfe J.M. What do 1 000 000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science. 9(1):1998;33-39.
44. Wolfe J.M., Bennett S.C. Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research. 37(1):1997;25-44.
45. Wolfe J.M., Friedman-Hill S.R. On the role of symmetry in visual search. Psychological Science. 3(3):1992;194-198.
46. Wolfe J.M., Friedman-Hill S.R., Stewart M.I., O'Connell K.M. The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18(1):1992;3449.
47. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S. A new look at preattentive vision. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 39(4):1998;S872.
48. Wolfe J.M., Yee A., Friedman-Hill S.R. Curvature is a basic feature for visual search. Perception. 21:1992;465-480.
49. Yantis S., Gibson B.S. Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 48:1994;182-204.