Effects of stimulus orientation on the identification of common polyoriented objects

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 650-658

  Leek, E C ^a,b  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347964960     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208841     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ARGUIN, M., & LEEK, E. C. (1495). Mental rotation for visual object recognition: Identical rules in priming and picture naming. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
2. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19,1162-1182.
3. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60-64.
4. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
5. CUTZU, F., & EDELMAN, S. (1994). Canonical views in object representation and recognition. Vision Research, 34, 22, 3037-3056.
6. DEUTSCH, G., BOURBON, W. T., PAPANIC-OLAOU, C., & EISENBERG, H. M. (1988). Visuospatial experiments compared via activation of regional cerebral blood flow. Neuropsychologia, 26, 445-452.
7. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation-dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
8. GEORGOPOULOS, A. P., LURITO, J. T., PETRIDES, M., SCHWARTZ, A. B., & MASSEY, J. T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234-236.
9. GIBSON, J. J., & ROBINSON, D. (1935). Orientation in visual perception: The recognition of familiar plane forms in differing orientations. Psychological Monographs, 46, 39-47.
10. GUM, T. (1995). Psychlab v1.0: Macintosh applications program [Software program]. Montreal: Psychlab.
11. HAMM, J. P., & MCMULLEN, P. A. (1998). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 413-426.
12. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1984). Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 385-415.
13. JOLICOEUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
14. JOLICOEUR, P. (1990). On the role of mental rotation and feature extraction in the identification of disoriented objects: A dual systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
15. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 90-94.
16. KOSSLYN, S. M., & ALPER, S. N. (1977). On the pictorial properties of visual images: Effects of image size on memory for words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 32-40.
17. KOSSLYN, S. M., ALPERT, N. M., THOMPSON, W. L., CHABRIS, C. F., RAUCH, S. L., & ANDERSON, A. K. (1994). Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. Brain, 117, 1055-1071.
18. LEEK, E. C. (1996). The representation of object orientation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
19. MAKI, R. H. (1986). Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 368-387.
20. MARR, D., & NISHIHARA, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 207, 187-217.
21. MCMULLEN, P. A., & FARAH, M. J. (1991). Viewer-centered and object-centered representations in the recognition of naturalistic line drawings. Psychological Science, 2, 275-277.
22. MURRAY, J. E., JOLICOEUR, P., MCMULLEN, P. A., & INGLETON, M. (1993). Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 604-610.
23. NEWELL, F., & FINDLAY, J. M. (1992). Viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Irish Journal of Psychology, 13, 494-507.
24. PALMER, S. E. (1989). Reference frames in the perception of shape and orientation. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 121-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. PALMER, S. E., ROSCH, E., & CHASE, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. ROCK, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
27. ROSCH, E. (1978). Principals of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. SCHWARTZ, S. P. (1981). The perception of disoriented complex objects. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 181-183).
29. SUTHERLAND, N. S. (1968). Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 171, 297-317.
30. TAKANO, Y. (1989). Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1-59.
31. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
32. TARR, M. J., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
33. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape processing. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
34. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychological Science, 1, 253-256.
35. ULLMAN, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
36. WAGEMANS, J., VAN GOOL, L., & LAMOTE, C. (1996). The visual system's measurement of invariants need not itself be invariant. Psychological Science, 7, 232-236.
37. WISER, M. (1981). The role of intrinsic axes in shape recognition. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 184-186).
38. ZUSNE, L. (1970). Visual perception of form. New York: Academic Press.