Derived attributes as mediators between categorization and acceptance of a new functional drink

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 328-336

  Huotilainen, Anna ^a   Seppala T ^a   Pirttila Backman A M ^a   Tuorila, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Categorization; Derived attributes; New foods; Social representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744444409     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A., Arvola, L., Lähteenmäki, H. Tuorila, Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: The effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite, 32, (1999) 113-126.
2. M. Augostinous, Social categorization: Toward theoretical integration K. Deaux G. Philogéne, Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (2001). Blackwell. Oxford: (201-216).
3. A. Bäckström A.-M. Pirttilä-Backman H. Tuorila Dimensions of novelty: A social representation approach to new foods. Appetite, 40, (2003) 299-307.
4. A., Bäckström, A.-M., Pirttilä-Backman, H. Tuorila, Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite, 43, (2004) 75-83.
5. M.W., Bauer, G. Gaskell, Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 29, (1999) 163-186.
6. A., Beardsworth, T. Keil, Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society. (1997) Routledge. London
7. A. Clémence, Social positioning and social representations. K. Deaux G. Philogène, Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (2001). Blackwell. Oxford: (83-95).
8. M., Connors, C.A. Bisogni, J., Sobal, C.M. Devine, Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite, 36, (2001) 189-200.
9. A., Drenowski, C. Hann, Food preferences and reported frequencies of food consumption as predictors of current diet in young women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70, (1999) 28-36.
10. A., Eagly, S. Chaiken, The psychology of attitudes. (1993) HBJ. Orlando:
11. R., Fagerli, M. Wandel, Gender differences in opinions and practices with regard to a "healthy diet". Appetite, 32, (1999) 171-190.
12. R. Farr, Theory and method in the study of social representations D. Canter G. Breakwell, Empirical approaches to social representations (1993). Oxford. Clarendon: (15-38).
13. T., Furst, M., Connors, C.A., Bisogni, J., Sobal, L. Falk, Winter Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite, 26, (1996) 247-266.
14. L., Holm, H. Kildewang, Consumers' views on food quality. A qualitative interview study. Appetite, 27, (1996) 1-14.
15. P., Kähkönen, H., Tuorila, H. Lawless, Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yogurt. Food Quality and Preference, 8, (1997) 125-130.
16. U.-K., Koivisto, P.-O. Sjöden, Reasons for rejection of food items in Swedish families with children aged 2-17. Appetite, 26, (1996) 89-103.
17. S. Lahlou, A method to extract social representations from linguistic corpora. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, (1996) 278-291.
18. S. Lahlou, Functional aspects of social representation. K. Deaux G. Philogène, Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (2001) Blackwell. Oxford: (131-146).
19. L., Lähteenmäki, K., Grunert, O., Ueland, A., Åström, A., Arvola, T. Bech-Larsen, Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Quality and Preference, 13, (2002) 523-533.
20. L., Lähteenmäki, H. Tuorila, Predicting the intention to use juice or milk in three contexts. Food Quality and Preference, 9, (1997) 231-236.
21. S. Moscovici, Foreword. C. Herzlich, Health and illness: A social psychological analysis (1973). Academic. London: (ix-xiv).
22. S. Moscovici, On social representations. Perspectives on everyday understanding. J.P. Forgas, Social cognition (1981). Academic. London: (181-209).
23. S. Moscovici, Social representations. Explorations in social psychology (2000). Polity. Cambridge
24. S. Moscovici, Why a theory of social representations? K. Deaux G. Philogéne, Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (2001). Blackwell. Oxford: (8-35).
25. P. Rozin, Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, (1996) 18-24.
26. W., Wagner, G., Duveen, R., Farr, S., Jovchelovitch, F., Lorenzo-Cioldi, I., Markovä, et al. Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, (1999) 95-125.
27. W., Wagner, F., Elejabarrieta, I. Lahnsteiner, How the sperm dominates the ovum: Objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, (1995) 671-688.
28. W., Wagner, N. Kronberger, Killer tomatoes! Collective symbolic coping with biotechnology. K. Deaux G. Philogène, Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (2001). Blackwell. Oxford: (147-164).
29. W., Wagner, N., Kronberger, F. Seifert, Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, (2002) 323-343.
30. A., Westcombe, J. Wardle, Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods. Appetite, 28, (1997) 49-62.
31. S., Wiggins, J. Potter, Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, (2003) 513-531.