Towards a paradigm for research on social representations

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 163-186

  Bauer, Martin W ^a   Gaskell, George ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033241609     PISSN: 00218308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5914.00096     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. ABRIC, J.C. (1994). (ed.) Pratiques sociales et representations, Paris: PUF.
2. ACKERMANN, W. & DULONG, R. (1971). Popularisation of science for adults. Social Science Information, 11(1), 113-148.
3. ALLANSDOTTIR, A., JOVCHELOVITCH, S. & STATHOPOULOU, A. (1993). Social representations: the versatility of a concept. Papers on Social representations, 2(2), 75-78.
4. BANGERTER, A. (1995). Rethinking the relation between science and common sense. Papers on Social Representations, 4, 61-78.
5. BAUER, M. (1994). Popular science as 'cultural immunisation'. The resistance function of social representations. In P. Guareschi and S. Jovchelovitch (eds.), Texts in Social Representations. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, pp. 229-260.
6. BAUER, M. (1995). Towards a functional analysis of resistance. In M. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to new technology - nulearpower, information technology, biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 393-418.
7. BAUER, M. (1998). The medicalisation of science news - from the "rocket-scalpel" to the "gene-meteorite" complex. Social Science Information, 37, 731-751.
8. BAUER, M. (in print). 'Science in the media' as cultural indicator: complementing survey indicators with media analysis. In M. Dierkes and C. von Grote (eds.) Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Reading: Harwood Academics Publisher.
9. BILLIG, M. (1988). Social representation, anchoring and objectification: a rhetorical analysis. Social Behaviour, 3, 1-16.
10. BLUMENBERG, H. (1990). Work on myth, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press [translated by R.M. Wallace from the German original, 1979].
11. BRAUDEL, F. (1958). La longue duree, Annales E.S.C., 4, 725-753.
12. BREAKWELL, G. & CANTER, D. (1993). (Eds.) Empirical approaches to the study of Social Representations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. BURGUIERE, A. (1983). La notion de 'mentalites' chez Marc Bloch et Lucien Febvre: deux conceptions, deus affiliations. Revue de Synthese, 111, 333-348.
14. CRANACH, M v. (1998). On the knowledge of social systems. In U. Flick (Ed.), Psychology of the social, Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, pp. 15-40.
15. CRANACH, M v. (1996). Toward a theory of the acting group. In E.H. Witte and J.H. Davis (eds.), Understanding group behaviour. Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 147-187.
16. CRONE, P. (1980). Islam, Judeo-Christianity and Byzantine iconoclasm. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 2, 59-95.
17. DAROSA, A.M. (1998). How to sell pullovers by promoting discussions on social issues: the role of advertising in activating and diffusing controversial representation. In V. Rigas (ed.), Social representations and contemporary social issues. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, pp. 228-277.
18. DOISE, W., CLEMENCE, A. & LORENZI-CIOLDI, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
19. DORNAN, C. (1990). Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of 'science in the media'. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 48-71.
20. DURANT, J., HANSEN, A. & BAUER, M. (1996). Public understanding of new genetics. In Marteau and Richards (eds.), The troubled helix - social and psychological consequences of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, pp. 235-248.
21. DURANT, J., BAUER, M.W., GASKELL, G. (1998). (eds.) Biotechnology in the public sphere: A European source book. London: Science Museum.
22. DURANT, J., BAUER, M., GASKELL, G., MIDDEN, C., LIAKOPOULOS, M. and SCHOTTEN, L. (in print). Two cultures of public understanding of science and technology in Europe. In M. Dierkes and C. von Grote (eds.), Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Reading: Harwood Academics Publisher.
23. DUVEEN, G. (1998). The psychosocial production of ideas: social representations and psychologic. Culture and Psychology, 4, 455-472.
24. EIRE, C.M.N. (1986). War against the idols. The reformation of worship from Erasmus to Calvin. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
25. FARR, R.M. (1987). Social Representations: A French tradition of research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17, 343-370.
26. FARR, R.M. (1993). Common sense, science and social representations. Public Undestanding of Science, 2, 189-205.
27. FLECK, L. (1935). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994 edition.
28. FLICK, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175-197.
29. FLICK, U. (1998). (Ed) The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
30. GASKELL, G. (1994). Survey research and consenuality: statistical and natural groups. Papers on Social Representations, pp. 29-32
31. GASKELL, G. & FRASER, C. (1990). The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. In C. Fraser and G. Gaskell (eds.), The social psychological of widespread beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon.
32. GASKELL, G., BAUER, M. & DURANT, J. et al. (1997). Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature, 387, 26 June, 845-847.
33. GUARESCHI, P. (1996). A ideologia: um terreno minado. Psychologia Social e Sociedade, 8(2), 82-94.
34. HALBERTAL, M. & MARGALIT, A. (1992). Idolatry. Harvard, HUP.
35. HARRE, R. (1984). Some reflections on the concept of 'Social Representation'. Social Research, 51, 927-938.
36. HASTORF, A.H. & CANTRIL, H. (1954). They saw a game: a case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129-134.
37. HERZLICH, C. (1973). Health and Illness. London: Academic Press.
38. HILGARTNER, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20, 519-39.
39. IRWIN, A. & WYNNE, B. (1996). (Eds.) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
40. ISRAEL, J. & TAJFEL, H. (1972). (Eds.) The context of social psychology. London: Academic Press.
41. JODELET, D. (1991). Madness and social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. JOVCHELOVITCH, S. (1996). In defense of representation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26, 121-136.
43. JURDANT, B. (1993). Popularization of science as the autobiography of science. Public Understanding of Science, 2(4), 365-374.
44. LAHLOU, S. (1998). Functional aspects of social representations. Paper to the New York Conference on Social Representations, CUNY. Oct 9-10, 1998.
45. LEPENIES, W. (1972). Melancholie und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
46. LEWIN, K. (1952). Behaviour and development as a function of the total situation. In Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 238-304.
47. LUCKMANN, T. (1995). Der kommunikative Aufbau der sozialen Welt und der Sozialwissenschaften. Annali di Sociologia, 11, 45-71.
48. LYOTARD, J.F. (1994). The post-modern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press [original in French, 1979].
49. MARKOVA, I., MOODIE, E., FARR, R.M., DROZDA-SENSKOWSKA, E., PLICHTOVA, J. EROS, F. GERVAIS, M.C., HOFFMANNOVA, J. & MULLEROVA, O. (1998). Social representations of the individual: a post-communist perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 797-892.
50. MARTEAU, T. & RICHARDS, M. (1996). (Eds.) The troubled helix. Social and psychological implications of new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
51. MOSCOVICI, S. (1976). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF, 2nd revised edition (first edition, 1961).
52. MOSCOVICI, S. (1981). On social representations. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: perspectives on everyday understanding. London: Academic Press, pp. 181-209.
53. MOSCOVICI, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr and S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-70.
54. MOSCOVICI, S. (1992). The psychology of scientific myths. In M. von Cranach, W. Doise and G. Mugny (eds.), Social representations and the social basis of knowledge. Toronto: Bern, pp, 3-9.
55. OAKESHOTT, M.J. (1991). Rationalism in Politics [new and expanded edition], Indianapolis, Liberty Press [original 1962].
56. PICKERING, A. (1992). (Ed.) Science as practice and culture. Chicago: Cambrige University Press.
57. PEREIRA DE SA. (1996). Determining the central nucleus of social representations. LSE Methodology Institute - Papers in Social Research Methods/Qualitative Series no 2.
58. ROSE, D. (in press). Television and community care. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology.
59. ROQUEPLO, P. (1974). Le partage du savoir. Paris: Seuil.
60. SENSALES, G. (1990). L'informatica nella stampa italiana. Milano: Franco Angeli.
61. SMITH, C.W. (1997). The ontological status of ideation: a continuing issue. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 129-137.
62. THOMMEN, B., VON CRANACH, M. AMMANN, A. (1992). The organisation of individual action through social representations: a comparative study of two therapeutic schools. In M. von Cranach, W. Doise, G. Mugny (eds.), Social representations and the social basis of knowledge. Lewiston: Hogrefe & Huber, pp. 184-201.
63. TOURAINE, A. (1995). The crisis of 'Progress'. In M. Bauer (ed.), Resistance to new technology. Nuclear power, information technology, biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, pp. 45-56.
64. TUOMELA, R. (1995). The importance of us. A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
65. VANELTEREN, M. (1990). Die Sozialpsychologie Lewins, marxistische Soziologie und Geschichte. Das Scheitern eines gemainsamen Projektes von Kurt Lewin und Karl Korsch, Psychologie und Geschuhte, 2, 1-18.
66. VOVELLE, M. (1990). Ideologies and mentalities. Chicago: Cambrige University Press.
67. WAGNER, W. (1996). Queries about social representations and construction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(2), 95-120.
68. WAGNER, W. (1997). Word association in questionnaires. A practical guide to design and analysis. LSE Methodology Institute - Papers in Social Research Methods/Qualitative Series no 3.
69. WAGNER, W., DUVEEN, G., FARR, R., JOVCHELOVITCH, S., LORENZI-CIOLDI, F. MARKOVA, I. & ROSE, D. (1999). Theory and methods of social representations, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, April.
70. WEART, S.R. (1988). Nuclear fear: a history of images. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
71. WYNNE, B. (1995). Public understanding of science. In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Marlde, J.C. Peterson and T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.