Dimensions of novelty: A social representation approach to new foods

Appetite

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 299-307

  Backstrom A ^a   Pirttila Backman A M ^a   Tuorila, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

New foods; Social representations

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; CHRONOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD PACKAGING; FOOD SAFETY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRIENT CONTENT; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; URBANIZATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037498339     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00005-9     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Beardsworth A., Keil T. Sociology on the menu: an invitation to the study of food and society. 1997;Routledge, London.
2. Beck U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. 1992;Sage, London.
3. Belton P. Chance, risk, uncertainty and food. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 12:2001;32-35.
4. Billig M. Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. 1987;Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. Bloor M., Frankland J., Thomas M., Robson K. Focus groups in social research. 2001;Sage, London.
6. Bourdieu P. Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. 1984;Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
7. Bredahl L. Consumers' cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods. Results of a qualitative study in four countries. Appetite. 33:1999;343-360.
8. Chaiken S., Pliner P. Women, but not men, are what they eat: the effect of meal size and gender on perceived femininity and masculinity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 13:1987;166-176.
9. Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. 1998;Sage, London.
10. Goldsmith R.E., Flynn L.R. Identifying innovators in consumer product markets. European Journal of Marketing. 26:1992;42-55.
11. Goldsmith R.E., Hofacker C.F. Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 19:1991;209-221.
12. Gronow J. The sociology of taste. 1997;Routledge, New York.
13. Grunert K.G., Lähteenmäki L., Nielsen N.A., Poulsen J.B., Ueland O., Åström A. Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification - results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries. Food Quality and Preference. 12:2001;527-542.
14. Jonas, M.S., & Beckmann, S.C (1998). Functional foods: Consumer perceptions in Denmark and England. MAPP Working paper no 55. Århus: Center for market surveillance, research and strategy for the food sector.
15. Kajanne A., Pirttilä-Backman A.-M. Toward an understanding of laypeople's notions about additives in food: clear-cut viewpoints about additives decrease with education. Appetite. 27:1996;207-222.
16. Karisto, A., Takala, P., Haapola, I (1998). Matkalla nykyaikaan: elintason, elämäntavan ja sosiaalipolitiikan muutos Suomessa. Porvoo: WSOY (In English: On the way to modernity: changes in standard of living, way of life and social policy in Finland.).
17. Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 61:1976;622-629.
18. McFarlane T., Pliner P. Increasing willingness to taste novel foods: Effects of nutrition and taste information. Appetite. 28:1997;227-238.
19. Miles S., Frewer L.J. Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Quality and Preference. 12:2001;47-61.
20. Morgan D.L. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology. 22:1996;129-152.
21. Mori D., Pliner P., Chaiken S. 'Eating lightly' and the self-presentation of femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53:1987;693-702.
22. Moscovici S. Foreword. Herzlich C. Health and illness: A social psychological analysis. 1973;ix-xiv Academic Press, London.
23. Moscovici S. On social representations. Forgas J.P. Social cognition. Perspectives on everyday understanding. 1981;181-209 Academic Press, London.
24. Myers D.G., Lamm H. The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin. 83:1976;602-627.
25. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite. 19:1992;105-120.
26. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 236:1987;280-285.
27. Steenkamp J.-B., Baumgartner H. Development and cross-cultural validation of a short form of CSI as a measure of optimum stimulation level. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 12:1995;97-104.
28. Tuorila, H (2001). Keeping up with the change: Consumer responses to new and modified foods. Food Chain 2001 Programme Abstract (pp. 38-40).
29. Tuorila H., Lähteenmäki L., Pohjalainen L., Lotti L. Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference. 12:2001;29-37.
30. Wagner W., Kronberger N. Killer tomatoes! Collective symbolic coping with biotechnology. Deaux K., Philogéne G. Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions. 2001;147-164 Blackwell, Oxford.