Psychometrics of Praxis III: Classroom performance assessments

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 163-187

  Dwyer, Carol Anne ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649084654     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008033111392     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Educational Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R.B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement New York: Longman.
3. Clark, C.M., & Peterson, PL. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed) (pp. 255-295). New York: Macmillan.
4. Danielson, C.F. (1997). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Dwyer, C.A. (1994). Development of the knowledge base for the Praxis 111: Classroom Performance Assessment criteria. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. Dwyer, C.A., & Stufflebeam, D. (1996). Teacher Evaluation. In D. Berliner & R. Calfree (eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 765-786). New York: Macmillan.
7. Dwyer, C.A., & Villegas, A.M. (1993). Guiding conceptions and assessment principles for The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers (Research Report No. 93-17). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. Educational Testing Service. (1993a). Standard setting: Q & A. Princeton, NJ: Author.
9. Educational Testing Service. (1993b). Using Praxis 111: Classroom Performance Assessments for teaching licensing. Princeton, NJ: Author.
10. Hood, S., & Parker, L. (1991). Minorities, teacher testing, and recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings: A regressive step. Teachers College Record, 92, 603-618.
11. Jones, J. (1992). Praxis III teacher assessment criteria research base. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Kagan, D.M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469.
13. Katz, L.G., & Raths, J.D. (1985). A framework for research on teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 9-15.
14. Klem, L. (1992). STAT state information tables, 1992. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15. Livingston, S. (1993). Inter-assessor consistency of the Praxis III: Classroom Performance Assessments: Spring 1992 preliminary version. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
17. Myford, C., Villegas, A.M., Reynolds, A., Camp, R., Jones, J., Knapp, J., Mandinach, E., Morris, L., & Sjostrom, B. (1993). Formative studies of Praxis III: Classroom Performance Assessments, an overview. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
18. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1991). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession (3rd ed.). Detroit, MI: Author.
19. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy act. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
20. Porter, A.C., & Brophy, J.E. (1987, June). Good teaching: Insights from the work of the Institute for Research on Teaching (Occasional Paper No. 114). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
21. Porter, A., & Brophy, J. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: Insights from the work of the Institute of Research on Teaching. Educational Leadership, 45(8), 74-85.
22. Powers, D.E. (1992). Assessing the classroom performance of beginning teachers: Educators' appraisal of proposed evaluation criteria (Research Report 92-56). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
23. Ross, J.A., & Regan, E.M. (1993). Sharing professional experience: Its impact on professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 91-106.
24. Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
25. Scriven, M. (1988a). Duties-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 319-334.
26. Scriven, M. (1988b). Evaluating teachers as professionals: The duties-based approach. In S.J. Stanley & W.J. Popham (eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success (pp. 110-142). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27. Shulman, L.S. (1988a). The paradox of teacher assessment. In New directions for teacher assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 13-27). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28. Shulman, L.S. (1988b). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform. Educational Leadership, 46, 36-41.
29. Smylie, M. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 1-30.
30. Stein, M., & Wang, M. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 171-187.
31. Sternberg, R.J., & Wagner, R.K. (1993). The g-centric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(1), 1-4.
32. Stodolsky, S.S. (1988). The subject matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Wesley, S., Rosenfeld, M., & Sims-Gunzenhauser, A. (1993). Assessing the classroom performance of beginning teachers: Teachers' judgments of evaluation criteria. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
34. Woolfolk, A.E., & Hoy, WK. (1990). Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.