Variable action effects: Response control by context-specific effect anticipations

Psychological Research

Volumn 68, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 155-162

  Kiesel, Andrea ^a   Hoffmann, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 2942735139     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0152-7     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Attention and performance series (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Elsner, B. & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
3. Gopher, D., Armony, L., & Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 308-339.
4. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). A double stimulation test of ideomotor theory with implications for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 392-398.
5. Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50-73.
6. Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Königsberg, Germany: August Wilhelm Unzer.
7. Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis. Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
8. Hoffmann, J. & Sebald, A. (2000). Lernmechanismen zum Erwerb verhaltenssteuernden Wissens. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 1-9.
9. Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 470-482.
10. Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176-186.
11. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Hommel, B., Posse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227-245.
13. James, W. (1890/1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
15. Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task-sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1474-1486.
16. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
17. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
18. Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67, 153-159.
19. Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A, 55, 581-592.
20. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
21. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
22. Meiran, N. (2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
23. Meiran, N. (2000b). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance 18: Controll of Cognitive Processes. Attention and performance series (pp. 377-399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Meiran, N., & Gotler, A. (2001). Modeling cognitive control in task switching and ageing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 165-186.
25. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
26. Münsterberg, H. (1889). Beiträge zur experimentalen Psychologie, Heft 1. Freiburg, Germany: Mohr.
27. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
28. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
29. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
30. Stock, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2002). Intentional fixation of behavioural learning, or how R-O learning blocks S-R learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 127-153.
31. Stock, A., & Stock, C. (in press). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychologcal Research.
32. Stöcker, C., Sebald, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 685-703.
33. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Ideo-motor action. Psychological Review, 20, 91-106.
34. Wundt, W. (1893). Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie, Vol. II, 4th ed. Leipzig: Engelmann.
35. Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962-978.
36. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595-613.
37. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2002). Effect anticipation in action planning. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention & Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 645-672). Oxford: Oxford University Press.