A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 581-592

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Stöcker, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036548821     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000433     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. De Houwer, J. (1998). The semantic Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A(3), 683-688.
2. De Jong, R., Liang, C.C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731-750.
3. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56(4), 261-268.
4. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward a action-concept model of stimulus response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier.
5. Hommel, B. (2000). A feature integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44A, 69-104.
7. Klapp, S., & Erwin, C. (1976). Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 591-598.
8. Klapp, S.T., McRae, L.E., & Long, W. (1978). Response programming vs. alternative interpretations of the "ditdah" reaction time effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11(1), 5-6.
9. Klapp, S.T., & Rodriguez, G. (1982). Programming time as a function of response duration: A replication of "ditdah" without possible guessing artifacts. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 46-56.
10. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 27(2), 253-270.
11. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 855-875.
12. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G.T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 688-714.
13. Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1992) Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115-130.
14. Lu, C.H., & Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(2), 174-207.
15. Mattes, S., Ulrich, R., & Leuthold, H. (1999). Kompatibilitdtseffekte durch irrelevante Reizmerkmale m einer nichträumlichen Anordnung [Compatibility effects by irrelevant stimulus features in a non-spatial arrangement]. Paper presented at the 41st Meeting of Experimental Psychology, Leipzig, Germany.
16. Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks. Abstracts of Psychonomic Society, 3, 193.
17. Proctor, R., Marble, J., & Vu, K. (2000). Mixing incompatible mapped location - relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 11-24.
18. Proctor, W., & Vu, K., (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443-473). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
19. Roswarski, T.E., & Proctor, R.W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 59. 196-211.
20. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umiltà, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1353-1364.
21. Simon, J.R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
22. Simon, J.R. (1982). Effect of an auditory stimulus on the processing of a visual stimulus under single-and dual-tasks conditions. Acta Psychologica, 51, 61-73.
23. Simon, J.R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R.W. Proctor & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: In integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier.
24. Stoffer, T., & Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier.
25. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2000). Suppression of location-based priming in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Umiltà, C.A., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.