Comprehending implied meaning in english as a foreign language

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 543-562

  Taguchi, Naoko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244454541     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00329.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Anderson, J. B. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
2. Association of International Education in Japan. (2003). Japanese language proficiency test. Available: http://www.aiej.or.jp
3. Bachman, L. E (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognise pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233-259.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279-304.
7. Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., &: Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Devel oping communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55-74). New York: Newbury House.
8. Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9. Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
10. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
11. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Bouton, L. (1992). The interpretation of implicature in English by NNS: Does it come automatically - Without being explicitly taught? In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 3, pp. 53-65). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
13. Bouton, L. F. (1994). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 5, pp. 88-109). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
14. Brumfit, C. (2000). Accuracy and fluency: The basic polarity. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 61-73). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
15. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical aspects of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
16. Carrell, P. L. (1981). Relative difficulty of request forms in L1/L2 comprehension. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL '81 (pp. 141-152). Washington, DC: TESOL.
17. Carrell, P. L. (1984). Inferencing in ESL: Presuppositions and implications of factive and implicative predicates. Language Learning, 34, 1-19.
18. Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. New York: Academic Press.
19. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Inexplicitness: What is it and should we be teaching it? Applied Linguistics, 20, 293-315.
20. Churchill, E. F. (2000, March). The acquisition of requests in an EFL context. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada.
21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
22. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
23. Cook, M., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2002). The development of comprehension in interlanguage pragmatics: The case of request strategies in English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 19-39.
24. DuFon, M. A. (2001). Triangulation in qualitative SLA research on interlanguage pragmatics. In S. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present, and future of second language research: Selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 251-270). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
25. Educational Testing Service (ETS). (2001). Supervisors' manual, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
26. Ellis, R. (1992). Learning to communicate in the class-room: A study of two language learners' requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 1-23.
27. Foss, D.J., & Hakes, D. T. (1978). Psycholinguistics: An introduction to the psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Freed, B., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 277-303.
29. Fukkink, R., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. (2005). Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. Modern Language Journal, 89, 54-75.
30. Gibbs, R. W. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 524-533.
31. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
32. Hamblin, J., & Gibbs, R. (2003). Processing the meaning of what speaker's say and implicate. Discourse Processes, 35, 59-80.
33. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle.
34. Hill, T. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Tokyo, Japan.
35. Hirai, A. (1999). The relationship between listening and reading rates of Japanese EFL learners. Modern Language Journal, 83, 367-384.
36. Holtgraves, T. (1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 519-540.
37. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225-252.
38. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Tech. Rep. No. 7). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
40. Jaeger, R. M. (1993). Statistics: A spectator sport (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Jiang, N. (2002). Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 617-637.
42. Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147.
43. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
44. Kasper, G. (1984). Pragmatic comprehension in learner-native speaker discourse. Language Learning, 34, 1-20.
45. Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22, 502-530.
46. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
47. Koike, D. A. (1996). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In S. M. Gass and J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 257-281). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
48. Koponen, M., & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 5-24). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49. Kotsonis, M. E. (1981). Children's interpretations of conversationally implied meanings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
50. Lachman, R., Lachman, J.L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1979). Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Longman. (1995). Longman's dictionary of contemporary English. New York: Longman.
53. Maeshiba, N., Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (1996). Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 155-187). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
54. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
55. Morgan, J. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 9. Pragmatics (pp. 261-280). New York: Academic Press.
56. Nelson, G. L., Carson, J., Batal, M. A., & Bakary, W. E. (2002). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Strategy use in Egyptian Arabic and American English refusals. Applied Linguistics, 23, 163-189.
57. Neumann, E., McCloskey, M. L., & Felio, A. C. (1999). Cross-language positive priming disappears, negative priming does not: Evidence for two sources of selective inhibition. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1051-1063.
58. Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring. Journal of Pyscholinguistic Research, 30, 163-184.
59. Pair, R. (1996). Spanish request strategies: A cross-cultural analysis from an intercultural perspective. Language Sciences, 18, 651-670.
60. Robinson, P. (2003, March). Introduction to the symposium on cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Paper presented at the annual conference of American Association for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, VA.
61. Roever, C. (2001). A Web-based test of interlanguage pragmatic knowledge: Speech acts, routines, implicatures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
62. Rose, K. R. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 27-67.
63. Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. New York: Pearson Education.
64. Rumelhart, D. E. (1993). Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 71-82). London: Oxford University Press.
65. Sasaki, M. (1998). Investigating EFL students' production of speech acts: A comparison of production questionnaires and role plays. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 457-484.
66. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
67. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
68. Segalowitz, N. (2001). On the evolving connections between psychology and linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 3-22.
69. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 175-201.
70. Segalowitz, S. J., Segalowitz, N., & Wood, A. (1998). Assessing the development of second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 53-67.
71. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning: A conceptual framework for teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
73. Snellings, P., van Gelderen, A., & Glopper, K. (2002). Lexical retrieval: An aspect of fluent second language production that can be enhanced. Language Learning, 52, 723-754.
74. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Swinney D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
76. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
77. Taguchi, N. (1999, August). L2 proficiency influence on learners' pragmatic realization; A speech act of request making. Paper presented at the AILA International Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
78. Taguchi, N. (2002). An application of relevance theory to the analysis of L2 interpretation processes: The comprehension of indirect replies. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 151-176.
79. Taguchi, N. (2003, March). Comprehension of implied meaning: Analyses of accuracy and comprehension speed. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, VA.
80. Takahashi, S. (1996). Pragmatic transferability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 189-223.
81. Takahashi, S., & Roitblat, H. L. (1994). Comprehension process of second language indirect requests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 475-506.
82. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
83. Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory and Cognition, 16, 283-298.
84. Towell, R. (2002). Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 117-150.
85. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
86. Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.
87. White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233-265.
88. White, L., & Juffs, A. (1998). Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of narrative language acquisition: Competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111-129). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Widdowson, H. G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 128-137.
90. Wolvin, A. D., & Coakley, C. G. (1985). Listening (2nd ed). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
91. Yamashita, S. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Tech. Rep. No. 14). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
92. Ying, H. G. (1996). Multiple constraints on processing ambiguous sentences: Evidence from adult L2 learners. Language Learning, 46, 681-711.
93. Ying, H. G. (2001, February). Relevance mapping: A study of L2 learners' processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences in English. Paper presented at the Annual Association for Applied Linguistics conference, St. Louis, Missouri.