Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 954-969

  Drieghe, Denis ^a   Rayner, Keith ^b   Pollatsek, Alexander ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye movements in reading; Fixation locations; Parafoveal processing; Perceptual span; Word skipping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBABILITY; READING; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADULT; ATTENTION; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY; READING; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISION, BINOCULAR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 27844505705     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875-890.
2. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24, 477-492.
3. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
4. Binder, K. S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1162-1172.
5. Blanchard, H. E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 85-94.
6. Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F. (in press). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125-147). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
8. Deutsch, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 393-421.
9. Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 79-103.
10. Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641-655.
11. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
12. Francis, W., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for theories of reading eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
14. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201-221.
15. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221-246). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
16. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431-439.
17. Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M., & Shindler, K. L. (2000). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1474-1484.
18. Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1312-1318.
19. Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (in press). The role of age-of-acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition.
20. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade-off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149-179). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
21. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 429-455.
22. Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153-168.
23. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1307-1337.
24. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68-81.
25. Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 132-138.
26. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
27. Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 268-281.
28. O'Regan, J. K. (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 112-117.
29. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
30. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 817-833.
31. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 123-130.
32. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2003). Modeling eye movements in reading: Extensions of the E-Z Reader model. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 361-390). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
33. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2005). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785-794.
35. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Ducrot, S. (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 178-202.
36. Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 165-191). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
37. Radach, R., & Kempe, V. (1993). An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 213-226). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38. Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3-26.
39. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
40. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
41. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
42. Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732.
43. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473-483.
44. Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41, 943-954.
45. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.
46. Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734-747.
47. Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129-1144.
48. Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. J. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340-352.
49. Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
50. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Eye movement control in reading: An overview and model. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 243-268). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
51. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., & Pollatsek, A. (2000). Eye movement control in reading: Updating the E-Z Reader model to account for initial fixation locations and refixations. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 701-719). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
52. Rayner, K., Reichle, E., & Pollatsek, A. (in press). Eye movement control in reading and the E-Z Reader model. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance and cognitive processes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
53. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
54. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1290-1301.
55. Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements during reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509.
56. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
57. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
59. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411.
60. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
61. Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2003). Foundations of an interactive model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 429-455). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
62. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
63. Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1021-1046.
64. Schustack, M. W., Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1987). Local and global sources of contextual constraint in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 322-340.
65. Starr, M., & Inhoff, A. W. (2004). Allocation of attention during eye fixations in reading: Use of orthographic information from multiple word locations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 203-225.
66. Underwood, G., Binns, A., & Walker, S. (2000). Attentional demands on the processing of neighbouring words. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 247-268). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
67. Vitu, F. (1991). The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 58-75.
68. Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & Lancelin, D. (2004). A test of parafoveal-on-foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 154-177.
69. Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 352-364.
70. Vonk, W., Radach, R., & van Rijn, H. (2000). Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in reading text. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 269-299). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
71. White, S. J. (2004, May). Foveal processing load does not modulate the probability of skipping the following word: Implications for models of eye movement control in reading. Paper presented at the Sixth European Workshop on Language Comprehension, St. Pierre d'Oléron, France.
72. White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (in press). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal word difficulty: A re-examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
73. Zola, D. (1984). Redundancy and word perception during reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 277-284.